russellcronk

$16k obo. Reply or call (856)472-3426 for more pics and additional info. See link to photo gallery for pics. https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/al...p?albumid=7967

IROCgiraffe

iTrader: (3)

GLWS

Javier87z28

iTrader: (1)

Bump love that blue and the 87 seats!

Steve86TA

iTrader: (57)

A 20K car with no details and two pics???

take a few minutes and read this handy post below
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/cama...ouncement.html

I'llrocya

How's it going? I sell cars for a living, but not a regular salesperson at a new car store. So I'm gonna make a comment, what I think is going on here is that it's a very low mileage excellent condition car thats worth top dollar whatever that is, I think thats what this ad is suggesting. True, I would have taken a lot more pictures and wrote way more but this is what I'm getting from this ad. When someone writes an ad like this it should be perfect when you go look at it. Just my two cents

I'llrocya

Really nice car by the way...

mantaguy

iTrader: (5)

This is the car that I had mentioned in the Low Mile 3rd Gen Post,I have a few other pics of it from the show.

((Mike))

iTrader: (1)

Beautiful car!! Out of my price range though. Hope you get what you want fot it. To a collector this thing is perfect.

Jim85IROC

iTrader: (2)

That's a truly remarkable car. If I could offer just one suggestion, it's that you post pics of the underside of the car. To be honest, everybody expects the exterior and interior to be perfect with that mileage. What separates one no-mile thirdgen from the rest is what the underside looks like. Does it have undercoating, or was this one spared? Are the original markings still visible, are the paper tags on the springs still in good shape, etc.

chazman

iTrader: (4)

Agreed! I've already passed this on to someone looking for a low miles IROC-Z.

GLWS!!!!

scottmoyer

For the right price, I'd sell my car!! Unlike you, Charlie, I don't have the emotional attachment of ordering the car new. I'd personally prefer a blue IROC-Z with the 5 speed and G92 and TTops. I'd also be willing to go with a red one. I like my car, but I would never have ordered my car as it sits now. Many years ago, there was a young member of TGO that had a 1987 IROC-Z with every option my car had, but was a 5 speed-LB9 G92. It had 19k miles at the time. Unfortunately, the member had to sell the car to pay for college and I wasn't in a place to buy. I haven't found many since.

russellcronk

I posted a total of 12 pics, 3 pics of the undercarriage. Are you guys not seeing them?

I assumed this was known but just in case all 1987 5.7 came standard with all G92 options.

scottmoyer

Actually, the 5.7 didn't come with G92. It came standard with all of the G92 options, but G92 was not listed. My post above mentioned the 305 with G92 because it was not standard on the 305. Any year other than an '87 350, the G92 is mandatory for me.

IROCZTWENTYGR8

iTrader: (1)

Wow SM, I thought that was the car you'd always have wanted lol. Mine is exactly the way I'd have ordered. The only thing I might have wanted was the trunk carpet, but I really don't care much. I will never sell unless mayyyyybe the same exact car in even better condition with even lower miles should come along some day. I doubt it will ever happen though. Also, a 100% stock car is a little boring to me!

mantaguy

iTrader: (5)

I'm not seeing them!!

russellcronk

If you are not seeing all 12 pics or for more pics go to Photo Gallery "1987 5.7 IROC-Z for sale, 5300 original miles".

scottmoyer

Chris,
I love my car, but the color was not my first choice and I'm not a fan of leather. Now, my car having leather makes it more "loaded", but I'm a simple guy and would prefer the performance options over all of the other stuff. On a two door car, I might not have ordered the car with power windows or locks, power leather seats or the Bose stereo. TTops and the power options are a requirement today, but not back then.

I looked at a 2003 Mustang GT when they were new and the only non standard option I was looking for was the Mach stereo upgrade. Power windows and locks was standard as was AC in 2003.

mantaguy

iTrader: (5)

OK,I see them.Nice Pics,

IROCZTWENTYGR8

iTrader: (1)

Crazy SM to think that we might have a Charlie or JasonE type of post from you in H/O someday about a new Third Gen lol.

russellcronk

Unfortunately the car was undercoated. Attached are photos of the tags on the 3.27 BW rear and the springs.

chazman

iTrader: (4)

Wish those pics were visible.

russellcronk

I can see them fine. I got the same feedback with the other pics I posted. I don't understand why I can see the pictures just fine but no one else can.

mantaguy

iTrader: (5)

I can't get them by clicking on the images above either,I do get them when I go to,
Photo Gallery
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/album.php?albumid=7967
"1987 5.7 IROC-Z for sale, 5300 original miles".

chazman

iTrader: (4)

I see them there. Man, oh man, is that car mint!

russellcronk

Thanks. I don't understand why I see the pics in this thread and no one else can. Please click on the link to the photo gallery for pics.

mantaguy

iTrader: (5)

I saw this car in person,IT IS FLAWLESS.

mantaguy

iTrader: (5)

Is this Beauty sold yet???

((Mike))

iTrader: (1)

I think I saw this car on Auto Trader today! It is listed for 16K. Thats a fair price for a beautiful car! Its my favorite color too! Im happy with my 5-speed. But if I were to get an automatic it would have to have the L98 like this car. Oh and there is a photo of the underside. It doesn't look undercoated to me. Glad I don't have another 16K laying around. I would have a tough time explaining to the wife why I need another blue 87 camaro.