Complete Audio Build - try #2
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Complete Audio Build - try #2
This is my second try at a custom setup for my '87 Camaro. First attempt is in this thread:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/car-...-build-up.html
Overall some components of this setup worked really well and others didn't. This is my attempt to fix all the issues. Some songs sounded great and others sounded terrible. I think I had some serious frequency gaps. I attribute this to retaining the factory dash locations. I just don't think this is a good location. Also I didn't like the harshness of the tweeters.
Current setup
head unit - Alpine 9887 w/ imprint
front speakers - Infinity 6020CS 6.5" 2 way passive components (woofer in stock dash location, tweeter in a-pillar)
rear speakers - Infinity 6020CS 6.5" 2 way passive components (in sail panels)
sub - 12" Image Dynamics IDQ V2, sealed in 1.25 ft^2 enclosure (IIRC) in rear well area
main amp - Apline V-Power F300 (75wx4 @ 2ohms, speakers are 2ohm)
sub amp - Alpine V-Power M500 (500w @ 2ohm)
The car is sound deadened.
To be clear this is strictly a SQ build
Future setup
Head unit - current, but open to other suggestions, local shop recommended the latest Alpine head units that have a lot more adjustments without relying on the automated adjustments of imprint, have not done any research yet.
New head unit needs to have:
- CD player
- ipod connection
- 4+ volt outputs
- multiband eq
- time alignment
- non-offensive lights, graphics and styling
- integrated HD radio is optional but preferred
- active crossover is optional
Front speakers - the 6.5" woofers will be installed in the doors near the power window motor. For this reason I am looking to go slim (2" mount depth or less) so my build out is un-obtrusive. I may stretch this to 2.5" later if I have to, but for now lets keep it to 2" or less. Tweeter I am unsure of location so far. Options include doors, a pillar, stock dash location. I am open for debate on this. I also prefer a neutral to laid back sound that will not fatigue. Budget is ~$500 for the front set
Speakers I am considering, I am open to other suggestions
- GermanMaestro EFS 6508 (1.77" deep)
- Rainbow CS 265 X-plain pro (1.69" deep)
- CDT CL-E61NEO (2.1" deep)
- Focal 165VRS (2.2" deep)
- Hertz ESK-F165.5 (1.7" deep)
- Zapco ZSL-165 (1.625" deep)
Rear speakers - I'm not sure what I want to do for these yet. It might depend on how much I spend for fronts and amps. I could see any one of the following options. I would love to hear opinions.
1. same or similar components as to the fronts
2. bass or mid-bass only (7-8")
3. 8" subs and lose the rear sub - i like this idea, I don't want to see my stereo stuff. Any issues with noise cancellation with the drivers pointing right at each other?
Amps - not sure yet. Thoughts on my current amps? In my experience, the difference between a top end and entry level amp is not that great. I would rather put the money into the speakers.
Sub - I don't have much reason to get rid of my current sub. I ran this sub for quite a while as a home theater / music sub in my living room while I was building a big HT sub and it sounded great, even with a ton of power. So I have no reason to believe this can't sound good in a car.
I would love to hear thoughts on this plan. Please skip comments like "just get some kenwoods". I need more detail than that.
My first and biggest project will be building door panels for the speakers. So finding the right speaker depth is my first priority. This will be a slow thread as I don't do anything on my car quickly.
Thanks,
John
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/car-...-build-up.html
Overall some components of this setup worked really well and others didn't. This is my attempt to fix all the issues. Some songs sounded great and others sounded terrible. I think I had some serious frequency gaps. I attribute this to retaining the factory dash locations. I just don't think this is a good location. Also I didn't like the harshness of the tweeters.
Current setup
head unit - Alpine 9887 w/ imprint
front speakers - Infinity 6020CS 6.5" 2 way passive components (woofer in stock dash location, tweeter in a-pillar)
rear speakers - Infinity 6020CS 6.5" 2 way passive components (in sail panels)
sub - 12" Image Dynamics IDQ V2, sealed in 1.25 ft^2 enclosure (IIRC) in rear well area
main amp - Apline V-Power F300 (75wx4 @ 2ohms, speakers are 2ohm)
sub amp - Alpine V-Power M500 (500w @ 2ohm)
The car is sound deadened.
To be clear this is strictly a SQ build
Future setup
Head unit - current, but open to other suggestions, local shop recommended the latest Alpine head units that have a lot more adjustments without relying on the automated adjustments of imprint, have not done any research yet.
New head unit needs to have:
- CD player
- ipod connection
- 4+ volt outputs
- multiband eq
- time alignment
- non-offensive lights, graphics and styling
- integrated HD radio is optional but preferred
- active crossover is optional
Front speakers - the 6.5" woofers will be installed in the doors near the power window motor. For this reason I am looking to go slim (2" mount depth or less) so my build out is un-obtrusive. I may stretch this to 2.5" later if I have to, but for now lets keep it to 2" or less. Tweeter I am unsure of location so far. Options include doors, a pillar, stock dash location. I am open for debate on this. I also prefer a neutral to laid back sound that will not fatigue. Budget is ~$500 for the front set
Speakers I am considering, I am open to other suggestions
- GermanMaestro EFS 6508 (1.77" deep)
- Rainbow CS 265 X-plain pro (1.69" deep)
- CDT CL-E61NEO (2.1" deep)
- Focal 165VRS (2.2" deep)
- Hertz ESK-F165.5 (1.7" deep)
- Zapco ZSL-165 (1.625" deep)
Rear speakers - I'm not sure what I want to do for these yet. It might depend on how much I spend for fronts and amps. I could see any one of the following options. I would love to hear opinions.
1. same or similar components as to the fronts
2. bass or mid-bass only (7-8")
3. 8" subs and lose the rear sub - i like this idea, I don't want to see my stereo stuff. Any issues with noise cancellation with the drivers pointing right at each other?
Amps - not sure yet. Thoughts on my current amps? In my experience, the difference between a top end and entry level amp is not that great. I would rather put the money into the speakers.
Sub - I don't have much reason to get rid of my current sub. I ran this sub for quite a while as a home theater / music sub in my living room while I was building a big HT sub and it sounded great, even with a ton of power. So I have no reason to believe this can't sound good in a car.
I would love to hear thoughts on this plan. Please skip comments like "just get some kenwoods". I need more detail than that.
My first and biggest project will be building door panels for the speakers. So finding the right speaker depth is my first priority. This will be a slow thread as I don't do anything on my car quickly.
Thanks,
John
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Western NY State
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 87 bird
Engine: enough to break stuff
Transmission: manual th400
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
i dont think you should change everything at once. you got good stuff i just think the car sucks for sq(stock positions). you would be surprised how much the speaker position and proper depth and cf of the airspace makes on the sound of the speakers. you say you dont want to see the speakers but i think the bigger the air space the better the sound(to a certain point). what type of music you listen to?
edit: after reading some reviews there are alot of complaints about those speakers (Shrill sounding)and i cant find install specs. i have polk speakers in my bird and my 07 monte and they are very natural sounding and loud and clear. i have clarion HU, polk db speakers with 50w/ch. and two lower power 10's, the component 6.5's are never going to fill the lows like a sub can and they sound better if not trying.
edit: after reading some reviews there are alot of complaints about those speakers (Shrill sounding)and i cant find install specs. i have polk speakers in my bird and my 07 monte and they are very natural sounding and loud and clear. i have clarion HU, polk db speakers with 50w/ch. and two lower power 10's, the component 6.5's are never going to fill the lows like a sub can and they sound better if not trying.
Last edited by jwfirebird; 10-30-2013 at 06:38 AM.
#3
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
If your primary goal is sound quality, have you considered the kick panel location? It's the most effective way to get equalized pathlengths and the best overall soundstage. The frequency response issues can be largely overcome through proper driver selection and equalization.
#4
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
i dont think you should change everything at once. you got good stuff i just think the car sucks for sq(stock positions). you would be surprised how much the speaker position and proper depth and cf of the airspace makes on the sound of the speakers. you say you dont want to see the speakers but i think the bigger the air space the better the sound(to a certain point). what type of music you listen to?
edit: after reading some reviews there are alot of complaints about those speakers (Shrill sounding)and i cant find install specs. i have polk speakers in my bird and my 07 monte and they are very natural sounding and loud and clear. i have clarion HU, polk db speakers with 50w/ch. and two lower power 10's, the component 6.5's are never going to fill the lows like a sub can and they sound better if not trying.
edit: after reading some reviews there are alot of complaints about those speakers (Shrill sounding)and i cant find install specs. i have polk speakers in my bird and my 07 monte and they are very natural sounding and loud and clear. i have clarion HU, polk db speakers with 50w/ch. and two lower power 10's, the component 6.5's are never going to fill the lows like a sub can and they sound better if not trying.
I can't believe I forgot the music. I listen to a lot of different kinds of music: rock, blues, vocals, folk, rap, country, probably in that order. One thing I don't listen to is music with heavy double bass. Two areas I am critical of are female voices and piano. Both seem very hard to reproduce correctly. I probably should have used the polk db's in my original build as I am a polk fan. Maybe they were too deep for the dash, I don't recall.
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
If your primary goal is sound quality, have you considered the kick panel location? It's the most effective way to get equalized pathlengths and the best overall soundstage. The frequency response issues can be largely overcome through proper driver selection and equalization.
My biggest concern with kick panels is left foot room. I want to be able to use the dead pedal to the left of the clutch. Thoughts? How far do you think a 2" deep speaker would stick out from the stock kick panel?
Finally, I have been very happy with the sound of door mounted speakers in other vehicles. That doesn't necessarily make it the best location of course.
#6
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
There's very little room behind the kick panels unless you're willing to cut some of the sheet metal. Without cutting that sheet metal, it will be necessary for almost all of the driver to protrude from the kick panel, and will render your dead pedal useless. I've become accustomed to resting my left foot under my clutch pedal when driving, so I don't really miss it.
#7
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
There's very little room behind the kick panels unless you're willing to cut some of the sheet metal. Without cutting that sheet metal, it will be necessary for almost all of the driver to protrude from the kick panel, and will render your dead pedal useless. I've become accustomed to resting my left foot under my clutch pedal when driving, so I don't really miss it.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Western NY State
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 87 bird
Engine: enough to break stuff
Transmission: manual th400
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
my current dd has components from the factory in the doors, this is pretty good setup, but i think if i was going to do anything it would be drivers in the doors and tweets in the a-pillars, i think on the fbody they might end up sort of under your knees. i had a neon that was that way and it seemed like the best place. i guess i like to hide the aftermarket stuff too if possible because i just reuse whats there for placement normally, people dont want to steal what they cant see.
also the pianos and midrange noise sometimes is better filled by some 6x9's, if you have 6.5 drivers in the front they seem a little high to me and there is a frequency gap between them and the subs imo. some good power 6x9's will fill some of that in, or possibly a smaller sub which i have never tried
also the pianos and midrange noise sometimes is better filled by some 6x9's, if you have 6.5 drivers in the front they seem a little high to me and there is a frequency gap between them and the subs imo. some good power 6x9's will fill some of that in, or possibly a smaller sub which i have never tried
Last edited by jwfirebird; 10-31-2013 at 08:22 AM.
#9
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
my current dd has components from the factory in the doors, this is pretty good setup, but i think if i was going to do anything it would be drivers in the doors and tweets in the a-pillars, i think on the fbody they might end up sort of under your knees. i had a neon that was that way and it seemed like the best place. i guess i like to hide the aftermarket stuff too if possible because i just reuse whats there for placement normally, people dont want to steal what they cant see.
also the pianos and midrange noise sometimes is better filled by some 6x9's, if you have 6.5 drivers in the front they seem a little high to me and there is a frequency gap between them and the subs imo. some good power 6x9's will fill some of that in, or possibly a smaller sub which i have never tried
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
i have the q-logic kick panels and i do like how they direct the sound as long as you don't have something large on the passenger floor board blocking the speaker. The q logics are kind cheap but they've been in my car over 15 years with no problems. On that note i'd like to say i've never used or been able to use my dead pedal but that has never been and issue and i've taken several lengthy road trips in my camaro. I've thought many times about beefing up the q-logics with some MDF rings and bracing on the back side, just something to make them a little more solid but never got around to it.
I've also thought about building custom tweeter mounts that mount to the triangles at the front of the door windows. I like things to appear as if it is supposed to be there and can't come up with a good idea to mount them. i also like all mods to be reversible, no making holes. Hope my input is helpful.
I am also in the middle of a major stereo overhaul/upgrade. So far i've upgraded my wiring (knu koncepts) and amps (RF Power Series). I'm still running a 15 year old panasonic Head Unit with less options than a modern factory unit, some 20 year old Boston 6.5s and some 11 year old kicker CVR12's. Sounds ok but nowhere near what it could be.
I've also thought about building custom tweeter mounts that mount to the triangles at the front of the door windows. I like things to appear as if it is supposed to be there and can't come up with a good idea to mount them. i also like all mods to be reversible, no making holes. Hope my input is helpful.
I am also in the middle of a major stereo overhaul/upgrade. So far i've upgraded my wiring (knu koncepts) and amps (RF Power Series). I'm still running a 15 year old panasonic Head Unit with less options than a modern factory unit, some 20 year old Boston 6.5s and some 11 year old kicker CVR12's. Sounds ok but nowhere near what it could be.
#11
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
i have the q-logic kick panels and i do like how they direct the sound as long as you don't have something large on the passenger floor board blocking the speaker. The q logics are kind cheap but they've been in my car over 15 years with no problems. On that note i'd like to say i've never used or been able to use my dead pedal but that has never been and issue and i've taken several lengthy road trips in my camaro. I've thought many times about beefing up the q-logics with some MDF rings and bracing on the back side, just something to make them a little more solid but never got around to it.
I've also thought about building custom tweeter mounts that mount to the triangles at the front of the door windows. I like things to appear as if it is supposed to be there and can't come up with a good idea to mount them. i also like all mods to be reversible, no making holes. Hope my input is helpful.
I am also in the middle of a major stereo overhaul/upgrade. So far i've upgraded my wiring (knu koncepts) and amps (RF Power Series). I'm still running a 15 year old panasonic Head Unit with less options than a modern factory unit, some 20 year old Boston 6.5s and some 11 year old kicker CVR12's. Sounds ok but nowhere near what it could be.
I've also thought about building custom tweeter mounts that mount to the triangles at the front of the door windows. I like things to appear as if it is supposed to be there and can't come up with a good idea to mount them. i also like all mods to be reversible, no making holes. Hope my input is helpful.
I am also in the middle of a major stereo overhaul/upgrade. So far i've upgraded my wiring (knu koncepts) and amps (RF Power Series). I'm still running a 15 year old panasonic Head Unit with less options than a modern factory unit, some 20 year old Boston 6.5s and some 11 year old kicker CVR12's. Sounds ok but nowhere near what it could be.
I have used knu koncepts wires in the past and was not impressed. I had several RCA cables fail. I will be tearing these out during this build.
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Only my power and grounds are knu koncepts. My RCAs and distribution blocks are stinger. I hear RF has good wire these days too.
#13
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Firebird Trans Am
Engine: 305 4bbl
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Wire is wire. The only two things you need pay attention to is that you use OFC copper wire with a high strand count, and that the wire you're purchasing doesn't use a lot of insulation and a little bit of wire. Don't get caught up in using name brand wire. Do your research.
Any manufactured RCA cable can be subjected to weak joints when the wire is soldered to the male plug. You can always build your own.
Any manufactured RCA cable can be subjected to weak joints when the wire is soldered to the male plug. You can always build your own.
#14
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Wire is wire. The only two things you need pay attention to is that you use OFC copper wire with a high strand count, and that the wire you're purchasing doesn't use a lot of insulation and a little bit of wire. Don't get caught up in using name brand wire. Do your research.
Any manufactured RCA cable can be subjected to weak joints when the wire is soldered to the male plug. You can always build your own.
Any manufactured RCA cable can be subjected to weak joints when the wire is soldered to the male plug. You can always build your own.
I laid out a design for the door pods in 3D. I will take some screen shots and share tomorrow.
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Western NY State
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 87 bird
Engine: enough to break stuff
Transmission: manual th400
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
pretty professional design, lol. how much space is there going to be for the speaker, you going to cut some airspace into the door?
#19
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
9 Posts
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: L31 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 D44
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
With your amps in place of the spare, what are you doing for a spare? AAA?
#20
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Have you made any progress on the panels?
With your amps in place of the spare, what are you doing for a spare? AAA?
With your amps in place of the spare, what are you doing for a spare? AAA?
I have a buddy who has a cnc router. So I am going to makes the pods that way. I just need to finalize my cad files.
Car is not a daily driver. I rely on 200mi AAA for things like flats. I would not want to drive the car on the 25yr old spare anyway.
#21
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
I have used Infinity in every vehicle I have owned. My 2008 Silverado has full infinity set, plus tweeters. I use headunit to power my stock tweeters as well. Blows away my buddies focal speakers he paid much more for. As long as you stick with infinity component sets you can't really go wrong. I use a 4.300 JL amp for my highs in my truck. I have infinity 4x6 plates up front and putting infinity kappa 6x9's in the back. Wanting to keep this a street/strip ride, so I am putting a small 8" woofer in the back. Going to be weird going from 18" FI in my old setup, to 2 12 T2's on 2600 watts and 3 batteries to a nice SQ system. LOL. Good luck!
#22
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Culpeper, Va
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 5.7 IROC Dark Red/Blk 92Z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Hello John, doing good here.. finished all my treatments just waiting to go back to work. Was just reading and came across this and wanted to input my suggestions.. I'm using a Kenwood bt952hd, has ipod connector from the rear, bluetooth, hd radio..and looks really nice. Built in connections and you can shut down the inner amp. For power I'm using 2 Kenwood 8502 4/3/2 channel amps. One for the interiors and one bridged for my bazooka tube sub. My interiors are jbl's p963 6 x 9's and two p6462's in the dash. Using the head units crossover and it all sounds great and should last forever.. again, thanks for your friendship in my time of need, it will never be forgotten.
Rudy a.k.a Stone
Rudy a.k.a Stone
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of Toronto
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Subscribing.....I really like the door buildout design
#24
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Hello John, doing good here.. finished all my treatments just waiting to go back to work. Was just reading and came across this and wanted to input my suggestions.. I'm using a Kenwood bt952hd, has ipod connector from the rear, bluetooth, hd radio..and looks really nice. Built in connections and you can shut down the inner amp. For power I'm using 2 Kenwood 8502 4/3/2 channel amps. One for the interiors and one bridged for my bazooka tube sub. My interiors are jbl's p963 6 x 9's and two p6462's in the dash. Using the head units crossover and it all sounds great and should last forever.. again, thanks for your friendship in my time of need, it will never be forgotten.
Rudy a.k.a Stone
Rudy a.k.a Stone
Nice to talk to you again. Thanks for the info.
John
#25
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Its been a while since I have updated this. Mostly because until now I have not made any progress.
I finally nailed down my door panel design. I will add some screen shots later. Looks quite similar to what I shared before.
I ended up with CDT CL-6SL slim woofers and Image Dynamics XS-28 tweeters. I am going for a laid back sound here. Especially for the tweeters. I can't wait to hear the XS-28's. I will be running this active on likely the Pioneer DEH-80PRS head unit. It looks like crossing this over at about 3k hz is a good place to start. I plan to use a Alpine PDX V9 amp.
I am a bit concerned about the mid bass on the slim mount CDT's. I guess we will have to see.
I am thinking about getting rid of my Image Dynamics IDQ V2 12" sub and replacing with either a pair or 6.5" or 6x9" Tang Band subwoofers in the rear sail panels.
Thoughts?
I suppose if I really run into problems with the mid bass I can run some 6.5" mid-woofers in the sail panels and retain a typical sub in the hatch. Although I would have to rethink my amp strategy.
John
I finally nailed down my door panel design. I will add some screen shots later. Looks quite similar to what I shared before.
I ended up with CDT CL-6SL slim woofers and Image Dynamics XS-28 tweeters. I am going for a laid back sound here. Especially for the tweeters. I can't wait to hear the XS-28's. I will be running this active on likely the Pioneer DEH-80PRS head unit. It looks like crossing this over at about 3k hz is a good place to start. I plan to use a Alpine PDX V9 amp.
I am a bit concerned about the mid bass on the slim mount CDT's. I guess we will have to see.
I am thinking about getting rid of my Image Dynamics IDQ V2 12" sub and replacing with either a pair or 6.5" or 6x9" Tang Band subwoofers in the rear sail panels.
Thoughts?
I suppose if I really run into problems with the mid bass I can run some 6.5" mid-woofers in the sail panels and retain a typical sub in the hatch. Although I would have to rethink my amp strategy.
John
#26
Member
iTrader: (6)
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Have you looked into JBL 6.5" components? I used to have JBL MS-62C's in my old 4th gen and they were excellent (to my ears).
I've used 6.5" kappas in the same 4th gen that were similar to your current components; they were too bright for me personally...
Edit to add: Polk's mm's are a decent speaker as well. (Polk's db series is alright, but their mm series has a noticeably better sound.)
Last edited by Alice89; 10-12-2014 at 03:07 AM.
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of Toronto
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
XS-28 tweet is a nice sounding unit.
I've heard Hertz shallow 6.5" mids and they had no problem producing great mid sound. Maybe put some wave deflector material behind the CDT (seems to add bass/impact to the mid). Just a thought.
Have you thought about going 8's in the sail area?
I've heard Hertz shallow 6.5" mids and they had no problem producing great mid sound. Maybe put some wave deflector material behind the CDT (seems to add bass/impact to the mid). Just a thought.
Have you thought about going 8's in the sail area?
#28
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
I cant wait to see pics; I'm thinking about installing a similar design like what you pictured in post #15.
Have you looked into JBL 6.5" components? I used to have JBL MS-62C's in my old 4th gen and they were excellent (to my ears).
I've used 6.5" kappas in the same 4th gen that were similar to your current components; they were too bright for me personally...
Edit to add: Polk's mm's are a decent speaker as well. (Polk's db series is alright, but their mm series has a noticeably better sound.)
Have you looked into JBL 6.5" components? I used to have JBL MS-62C's in my old 4th gen and they were excellent (to my ears).
I've used 6.5" kappas in the same 4th gen that were similar to your current components; they were too bright for me personally...
Edit to add: Polk's mm's are a decent speaker as well. (Polk's db series is alright, but their mm series has a noticeably better sound.)
I will have to post some pictures of the CDTs. They are a pretty interesting design. The cone is actually a honeycomb assembly and is extremely stiff.
#29
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
XS-28 tweet is a nice sounding unit.
I've heard Hertz shallow 6.5" mids and they had no problem producing great mid sound. Maybe put some wave deflector material behind the CDT (seems to add bass/impact to the mid). Just a thought.
Have you thought about going 8's in the sail area?
I've heard Hertz shallow 6.5" mids and they had no problem producing great mid sound. Maybe put some wave deflector material behind the CDT (seems to add bass/impact to the mid). Just a thought.
Have you thought about going 8's in the sail area?
I have considered 8's in the sail panel. Either woofers or subs. I need to do some testing though, I believe a little bit of metal will need to be removed. And I need to see if the OEM cover will still fit. Thoughts? I have some home audio 8" woofers laying around I can mock up.
#31
Member
iTrader: (6)
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
There are a lot of speakers I probably would have chosen over the CDT slims given more mounting depth. These CDT's are only 1.5" mounting depth. I chose to go that route to minimize loss of leg room. Especially on the drivers side with clutch/dead pedal room.
I will have to post some pictures of the CDTs. They are a pretty interesting design. The cone is actually a honeycomb assembly and is extremely stiff.
I will have to post some pictures of the CDTs. They are a pretty interesting design. The cone is actually a honeycomb assembly and is extremely stiff.
The CDT's look good though.
#32
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of Toronto
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Yeah I was considering the Hetz speakers as well. When I found the CDT's I got all excited because they were another 0.5" slimmer than most slim speakers. We'll see if I pay the penalty. Encourage that the Hertz sounded good though.
I have considered 8's in the sail panel. Either woofers or subs. I need to do some testing though, I believe a little bit of metal will need to be removed. And I need to see if the OEM cover will still fit. Thoughts? I have some home audio 8" woofers laying around I can mock up.
I have considered 8's in the sail panel. Either woofers or subs. I need to do some testing though, I believe a little bit of metal will need to be removed. And I need to see if the OEM cover will still fit. Thoughts? I have some home audio 8" woofers laying around I can mock up.
10's
Sail panel seems to fit both.
#33
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
I will have to check it out. Looks like they made a baffle and the speaker sits further out than stock. Seems like the surround would hit the back of the cover. I will play around with it. 8's would be nice. Thanks.
I started on fabricating the door pods. First part is the grill frame. Once complete, black grill cloth will will be stretched over the frame.
I started on fabricating the door pods. First part is the grill frame. Once complete, black grill cloth will will be stretched over the frame.
#34
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Here is a better representation of what it should look like. Actual pod is slightly smaller in all dimensions.
#35
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of Toronto
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Sorry, no pics but I remember making a bracket to mount behind the sub with no baffle. The sub screwed to the body and into the bracket behind for added support.
#36
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
The new mount is thinner than the factory metal mount so the panels will fit. Back in the early 90's I ran Soundstream Granite Series 8's in the sail for a year.
Sorry, no pics but I remember making a bracket to mount behind the sub with no baffle. The sub screwed to the body and into the bracket behind for added support.
Sorry, no pics but I remember making a bracket to mount behind the sub with no baffle. The sub screwed to the body and into the bracket behind for added support.
So what did you think of the 8's back there?
#37
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Here is my test piece. Getting close to ready for fiberglass. I have never worked with fiberglass before so I wanted to build an test piece first.
One of my concerns was the corners would go concave when the cloth was stretched over the frame. And that is exactly what happened. So I had to add these in the corners for support.
One of my concerns was the corners would go concave when the cloth was stretched over the frame. And that is exactly what happened. So I had to add these in the corners for support.
#38
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
After I added the guides, the fabric stretched pretty nice. Will need some body filler. If I take a little more care with the guide placement I can avoid a lot of issues. I wetted out the fabric tonight and will see how it turns out tomorrow morning.
#39
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of Toronto
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
(car became the only Soundstream sponsored IASCA vehicle in Canada)
#40
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
I measured the metal opening in the sail panel to be 6 3/8" x 9 1/8". And at the shallowest point (the bottom) there is approx 3/4" between my current mdf panel (see below) and the back of the interior plastic. It looks like the cutout diameter for 8's is in the 7.25-7.5 neighborhood.
Did you run the 8's IB? That is one of my challenges with using sail panel subs. I am not willing to fiberglass the inside of the sail panel to seal it off.
Did you run the 8's IB? That is one of my challenges with using sail panel subs. I am not willing to fiberglass the inside of the sail panel to seal it off.
#41
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Two layers of fiberglass on my door pod. Everything is now quite stiff. 2 layers will be enough.
#42
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of Toronto
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Some deadener on the inside behind the sub might be an idea.
#43
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Cool. Sail panels are already deadened. I was looking at some suitable IB subs.
DLS OA8
Image Dynamics ID8
Anarchy 6.5
Honestly I would love to run Acoustic Elegance subs but they only make the IB series down to 10".
DLS OA8
Image Dynamics ID8
Anarchy 6.5
Honestly I would love to run Acoustic Elegance subs but they only make the IB series down to 10".
#44
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Looks like I have 5" mounting depth at the bottom of the cutout and 3.75" in the middle. So I will have to keep the sub at or near 4" mount depth realistically.
DLS OA8 - 4.72" - not going to work
Image Dynamics ID8 - 4.75" - not going to work
Anarchy 6.5 - 3.66" - will work
Peerless SLS - 4.39" - might work
Dayton RS225 - 3.62" - will work
The Peerless SLS gets awesome reviews in IB. I am inclined to try them. I just need to determine if the depth is really going to work.
John
DLS OA8 - 4.72" - not going to work
Image Dynamics ID8 - 4.75" - not going to work
Anarchy 6.5 - 3.66" - will work
Peerless SLS - 4.39" - might work
Dayton RS225 - 3.62" - will work
The Peerless SLS gets awesome reviews in IB. I am inclined to try them. I just need to determine if the depth is really going to work.
John
Last edited by 87350IROC; 10-20-2014 at 01:24 AM.
#45
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
I can now see why the Peerless is so well regarded in IB. It whoops the rest of the contenders.
Right click - view image for full resolution
Right click - view image for full resolution
Last edited by 87350IROC; 10-20-2014 at 02:17 AM.
#46
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
Good news. The Peerless specs on Parts Express was wrong. They are only 3.94" deep. I am going to pick up a pair and I will make them fit.
#47
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
I worked on my test piece some more. While routing out the center section I had the bearing on my flush trim bit come apart. Fortunately for me, the pod acted like a shield and I didn't receive any of the debris.
Notice the screw that holds the bearing to the cutter is still there. Lucky day for me.
Anyway, I also got to the first coat of body filler. I have never done filler before but it seemed to work pretty well. I will do the rest of the part tomorrow and it will probably require a quick second coat.
Notice the screw that holds the bearing to the cutter is still there. Lucky day for me.
Anyway, I also got to the first coat of body filler. I have never done filler before but it seemed to work pretty well. I will do the rest of the part tomorrow and it will probably require a quick second coat.
#48
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
I got the vinyl mostly installed on the test piece. It went pretty well with the exception of two locations. The first is the acute angle. There just is no place for the fabric to go on the back side of the pod. The second is where the vinyl has to go down the edge where the grill will sit. I just don't know how to make this look good yet. The vinyl stretches pretty well, but I am asking a lot from it.
#49
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Complete Audio Build - try #2
I started working on the actual pods for my car. So far so good.
Here is the top surface with speaker mount.
And with the grill frame set inside.
Here is the top surface with speaker mount.
And with the grill frame set inside.