Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!

AXXF vs, AUJP spark advance tables

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-16-2010, 06:44 PM   #1
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 264
Car: 91 SLP GTA
Engine: Five Seven
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (3)

AXXF vs, AUJP spark advance tables

I was looking at the differences between Bins today and decided to check out a 305 TPI's chip just to see if there was a difference so I looked at the AXXF bin which is for a 305/Auto car with speed density and TPI and compared it to a stock AUJP bin. I found that the VE tables were the same, but the AXXF bin had a much more aggressive spark advannce table than the AUJP for the 350 motors. Is there a reason why GM did this? I know that the LB9 and the L98 have the same compression ratio, and same camshaft specs in 91-92 but both used iron heads and both have the same fueling curve? Has anybody ever tried running the more aggressive SA table from the 305 on a 350 motor?
91 Trans Am GTA
5.7L/T56 6-speed
Gunmetal Grey
SLP Performance Package (Almost)
Dyno Don Headers
JekyllandHyde is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 07:53 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Camden, MI
Posts: 657
Car: 1985 IROC-Z28
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: AXXF vs, AUJP spark advance tables

IIRC, a larger bore requires more advance for obvious reasons... and since the main difference between any 305 and 350 is the bore, that may explain the differences you saw.
Saar is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 07:53 PM
1992 Camaro

Paid Advertisement


Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

350, advance, aujp, aujpbin, axxf, bin, chevy, chip, compression, gm, prom, ratio, spark, table, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.

All content copyright 1997 - 2014 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details