Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

Reusing Rocker arms?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2014, 10:46 PM
  #1  
GXP
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dover, OH
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: 350 Crate
Transmission: 700R4 with shift kit
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 2.73
Reusing Rocker arms?

I recently purchased a 350 block and heads to build up for my 87 firebird. Based off of the numbers from research, it all appears to be a '70 engine from a 1970 Caprice. The block is all original and in good shape, but I was wanting to build a 357 out of it, so I would bore it .040. A couple pushrods are missing, so I will get new ones, and more than likely new heads (Vortecs?) as well.

My main question is, would I still be able to use the original rocker arms regardless of heads/ pushrods? Are they even worth salvaging?

P.S. - The pistons aren't salvageable either, but since I wanted to bore I'm assuming that won't matter.
Old 10-29-2014, 03:17 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
Night rider327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bowdon, GA.
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Reusing Rocker arms?

Rocker arms needs to match your head's guiding system.

1955-86 heads have round holes in head that pushrods pass through and non self aligning rocker arms. The holes in heads acts as the pushrod guide.

1987-up uses self aligning rocker arms. The rockers have a ridge or lip on each side of the valve stem end and acts as the pushrod guide.

Some factory heads, modded by user heads and almost all aftermarket heads have screw in rocker arm studs and guide plates. If stock type heads, the pushrod hole is drilled large to keep from binding. The guide places are the pushrod guides.. You would use 1955-86 style non self aligning rockers for these.

You can't double guide the pushrods.. Most only use 1 type of guide.
Old 10-29-2014, 06:47 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,037
Received 1,666 Likes on 1,264 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Reusing Rocker arms?

Why bore it .040"? Correct way to maintain an engine is, bore it as little as possible, so that the next time it wears out, there's still as much left as possible. Which means, don't bore it at all, unless it needs it. Which it almost certainly does; but it doesn't need to go .040" unless it's already at .030"... which is highly possible, especially if the bores don't look very worn. For all you know, it could already have been "rebuilt" by a typical "rebuilder", and therefore might already be .060" over, because alotta those guys couldn't care less about re-using em; they just want to make em all the same, as quick as possible, and so they punch every one to the absolute max to make sure they clean up all the wear on all of em. Any 70 motor is highly likely to have already been down that road. Don't get too wrapped up in a bunch of .040" until you measure it. Then if it's still std bore, punch it out as little as possible to clean up the wear, subject to being able to buy pistons for that size.

Stock rockers are made from stamped sheet rubber. Why in the world would you want to actually build a motor and re-use that garbage? Throw that in the trash where it belongs.

Same for the stock push rods. Absolutely not worth salvaging.

Worry about rockers after you get heads. Put in whatever whichever heads you get require. It's too early to be thinking about that right now.
Old 10-29-2014, 08:14 AM
  #4  
GXP
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dover, OH
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: 350 Crate
Transmission: 700R4 with shift kit
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 2.73
Re: Reusing Rocker arms?

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Why bore it .040"? Correct way to maintain an engine is, bore it as little as possible, so that the next time it wears out, there's still as much left as possible. Which means, don't bore it at all, unless it needs it. Which it almost certainly does; but it doesn't need to go .040" unless it's already at .030"... which is highly possible, especially if the bores don't look very worn. For all you know, it could already have been "rebuilt" by a typical "rebuilder", and therefore might already be .060" over, because alotta those guys couldn't care less about re-using em; they just want to make em all the same, as quick as possible, and so they punch every one to the absolute max to make sure they clean up all the wear on all of em. Any 70 motor is highly likely to have already been down that road. Don't get too wrapped up in a bunch of .040" until you measure it. Then if it's still std bore, punch it out as little as possible to clean up the wear, subject to being able to buy pistons for that size.

Stock rockers are made from stamped sheet rubber. Why in the world would you want to actually build a motor and re-use that garbage? Throw that in the trash where it belongs.

Same for the stock push rods. Absolutely not worth salvaging.

Worry about rockers after you get heads. Put in whatever whichever heads you get require. It's too early to be thinking about that right now.
We measured the bore and checked the pistons. They are currently a 4.00" bore. The cylinders aren't bad but will definitely need boring out. I guess boring it as little as possible makes sense. And I was just wondering if the OEM rocker arms would be compatible with what heads I was looking at.

Thanks a lot!
Old 10-29-2014, 04:27 PM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally Posted by Night rider327
1955-86 heads have round holes in head that pushrods pass through and non self aligning rocker arms. The holes in heads acts as the pushrod guide.

1987-up uses self aligning rocker arms. The rockers have a ridge or lip on each side of the valve stem end and acts as the pushrod guide.
Not to nitpick, but the self-aligning started in 1988 model year. And, self-aligning have round pushrod holes. '87-earlier non-self-aligning holes were more oval shaped (straight sides with rounded ends).

All Vortec SBC heads have round pushrod holes, and use self-aligning rockers.
Old 10-29-2014, 11:52 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
Night rider327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bowdon, GA.
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Reusing Rocker arms?

Originally Posted by five7kid
Not to nitpick, but the self-aligning started in 1988 model year. And, self-aligning have round pushrod holes. '87-earlier non-self-aligning holes were more oval shaped (straight sides with rounded ends).

All Vortec SBC heads have round pushrod holes, and use self-aligning rockers.

Sorry five7kid, you are incorrect. The self-aligning rockers started at the same time as the center bolt valve covers and 1 pc rear seal.

That was 1987..

Here's some sources
http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/vem...e-rocker-arms/
"Only a few insignificant design changes occurred during the life of the stamped rocker. Most notably, a self-aligning version replaced pushrod-guideplate-type rockers across the board in '87"

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cc...et?prefilter=1
Make:CHEVROLET
Beginning Year:1987
Ending Year:2000
Engine Type:V8
Liter:5.7
CID:350
Engine Size:5.7L/350
Engine Family:Chevy small block Gen I

http://www.compperformancegroupstore...Category_Code=
" 1987+ SBC engines came equipped w/ self-aligning rockers. Guide plates are required when using non-self aligning rocker arms on engines originally equipped w/ self-aligning rockers."

You are correct on the pushrod hole shapes, but also the round holes in the vortec heads are much larger than the elongated holes in the 55-86 heads.

IIRC the 55-86 heads had a 3/8" or less wide opening and the vortec heads pushrod holes are closer to 7/16"
Old 10-30-2014, 06:01 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,037
Received 1,666 Likes on 1,264 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Reusing Rocker arms?

"Sources" aren't always very accurate. I prefer to simply LOOK AT THE PARTS, like everything else.

I'm quite sure for example that when we had to work on my brother's 87 Monte Carlo SS L69, the rockers were NOT self-aligning.

I've pretty much come to accept that the changeover was a bit more gradual than magazine articles seem to indicate; kinda like the 28-spline axle deal. They used whatever they had on hand until it ran out. And that happened at different times in different applications.

55 - 86ish heads had slots that were 5/16" wide, same as the push rods, except with a few .001"s of tolerance.
Old 10-30-2014, 07:13 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Bob88GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 3,938
Received 97 Likes on 62 Posts
Car: 88GTA
Engine: 5.7TPI
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Reusing Rocker arms?

"Stock rockers are made from stamped sheet rubber. Why in the world would you want to actually build a motor and re-use that garbage? Throw that in the trash where it belongs."

I just love your "straight to the point advise" Sofa!
We need more of that.
Old 10-30-2014, 01:23 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (167)
 
John in RI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RI
Posts: 5,018
Received 348 Likes on 263 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.11 LS1 Rear End
Re: Reusing Rocker arms?

Originally Posted by Night rider327
Sorry five7kid, you are incorrect. The self-aligning rockers started at the same time as the center bolt valve covers and 1 pc rear seal.

That was 1987..

Here's some sources
http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/vem...e-rocker-arms/
"Only a few insignificant design changes occurred during the life of the stamped rocker. Most notably, a self-aligning version replaced pushrod-guideplate-type rockers across the board in '87"

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cc...et?prefilter=1
Make:CHEVROLET
Beginning Year:1987
Ending Year:2000
Engine Type:V8
Liter:5.7
CID:350
Engine Size:5.7L/350
Engine Family:Chevy small block Gen I

http://www.compperformancegroupstore...Category_Code=
" 1987+ SBC engines came equipped w/ self-aligning rockers. Guide plates are required when using non-self aligning rocker arms on engines originally equipped w/ self-aligning rockers."

Can't believe everything that you read...... Here's a picture of stock 87 TPI heads with factory installed NSA rockers:






Old 10-30-2014, 06:07 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,037
Received 1,666 Likes on 1,264 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Reusing Rocker arms?

"straight to the point advise" We need more of that.
Thanks!!

I'm not very "politically correct" about most things, either.
Old 10-30-2014, 11:45 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
Night rider327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bowdon, GA.
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Reusing Rocker arms?

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
I've pretty much come to accept that the changeover was a bit more gradual than magazine articles seem to indicate; kinda like the 28-spline axle deal. They used whatever they had on hand until it ran out. And that happened at different times in different applications.
Yeah I guess that's the case here. I have a set of heads sitting under a bench in my shop that came off a stock 170K miles wrecked 1987 IROC TPI 305.. That would be the LB9 engine IIRC. They have the self aligning rockers.
Old 10-31-2014, 11:01 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (167)
 
John in RI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RI
Posts: 5,018
Received 348 Likes on 263 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.11 LS1 Rear End
Re: Reusing Rocker arms?

I had always believed that the 87+ was the cut-off too,... till I learned otherwise. Since then I've had 3 sets of KNOWN 87 heads (all 081's), all used NSA, and all had the same type pushrod hole/slot shown above.


I haven't seen SA rockers on an 87' 081,..... Yet !



Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MoJoe
Members Camaros
31
10-06-2021 06:38 PM
92rsvortec350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
19
10-09-2015 09:39 AM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
10-05-2015 10:05 PM
1HotZ28&SS
Suspension and Chassis
3
09-28-2015 08:58 PM
New2Chevy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
09-28-2015 12:35 AM



Quick Reply: Reusing Rocker arms?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.