History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

4 Banger Camaro!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2006, 02:40 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
My350Camaro84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 Stroker TPI
Transmission: T-56
4 Banger Camaro!

okay I know I've seen forums on this but I just found an all original 4 cylinder camaro. Would this be worth putting some new seats and new quarter panels on and selling? or does no one under the sun want an original 4 banger. well let me know because this thing is going to get crushed soon.
Old 02-01-2006, 03:02 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
82knightrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arcadia ,Ca
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 firebird s/e 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305ci 4b carb.....CFI
Transmission: TH200C....700R4
Well if you got the car for free and runs good than id say its worth it.Otherwise i say crush it
Old 02-01-2006, 03:26 PM
  #3  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (2)
 
Jim85IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 13,574
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
It's rare, but since there's no demand for it, the value is still going to be very low.
Old 02-01-2006, 04:11 PM
  #4  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes on 118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Unfortunately I forsee the following
V8 cars are going to be worth the most period
A V6 car will be worth about half or 2/3 a V8 car
A I4, will be worth about half or less, there are a few people out there that think there novel, but the base is so small, that there not highly desired.

If you look at a 1999 Firebird for example, and it has a V6, its worth about the same as a 99 Grand Am in similar condition. But take that same car make it a Trans Am or A Formula and it is worth alot more.... V8's hold value better, period.

You would be better off, throwing in a V8, some v8 springs for the extra weight and sell it... But thats not worht the hassle for what you can get a V8 car for...

John
Old 02-01-2006, 04:14 PM
  #5  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes on 118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
I just thought of something, Imagine your at the Barret Jackson Auction, if a I-4 Car comes across the platform, most people grimice, and giggle, Heck I cant think of any car that goes accross the stage thats less than 8, unless its a Turbo, OR its 50 years old...

EDIT - Slap a Turbo on it and then sell it...
John

Last edited by okfoz; 02-01-2006 at 04:23 PM.
Old 02-02-2006, 12:06 AM
  #6  
Member
 
87TAairlineyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Whitehouse, Ohio
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 305 LB9 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700-R4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: Saginaw 10 bolt 2.73 posi
I don't think that the market for 20 year old econo-sports cars is hot enough that you'd find it worth your effort. Those 4 cylinder cars were slow, the gas mileage was marginal at best, and usually had the cheap base interior. None of these are selling points in a 20 year old car. Little performance, low comfort.

Now if gas rises in cost to $6 a gallon, it might be worthwhile as a work car. But I doubt that there are many collectors out there interested in a 4 cylinder Camaro.
Old 02-02-2006, 10:24 AM
  #7  
Member

 
stitchop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Hoxie Arkansas Posts: 12,547
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
If the car is in nice condition and runs very well, and is very cheap, I would buy it.

Key words; NICE, WELL, CHEAP
Old 02-02-2006, 10:24 AM
  #8  
Member

 
flyboy367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sayreville nj usa
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 02 redfire gtp coupe
Engine: 3.8 modded and supercharged
Transmission: 4t65-ehd
where are ya? ill take it

how bad is the car anyway? pics?
Old 02-02-2006, 10:08 PM
  #9  
Member

 
KRACKER JACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: CAMARO RS
Engine: 3.1 V6,5.0 tpi
Transmission: AUTOMATIC, t5
Axle/Gears: one tire fire ,posi disc
take it

i would take it theres probibly acollecter who will wantit and with gas prices on the rise someone would take it it still has more power than one of those electric cars
Old 02-02-2006, 10:47 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
82knightrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arcadia ,Ca
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 firebird s/e 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305ci 4b carb.....CFI
Transmission: TH200C....700R4
I think 82 iron duke sold his for 2500$ or something like that.not bad for a 4 banger
Old 02-03-2006, 07:47 AM
  #11  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes on 118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: take it

Originally posted by KRACKER JACK
i would take it theres probibly acollecter who will wantit and with gas prices on the rise someone would take it it still has more power than one of those electric cars
Actually you would get better mialage by buying a 94-96 Roadmaster, they got 33MPG highway when new... then run the quarter mile in 15 sec...

Honestly, I forsee there no collectability in fuel efficent cars, except possibly for a Museum dedicated to the preservation of Fuel efficent milestones... I dont think a 4 cyl Camaro would classify any way.

John
Old 02-04-2006, 11:12 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
Krazzycowgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Washington state
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 Irocz, 95 Z28, 71 Z28 /RS
Engine: 355 Tpi, LT1, 355
Transmission: Auto, Auto, 4sp
Where the car at? ship pics looking for somethign for my son
Old 02-12-2006, 02:16 PM
  #13  
Member
 
92vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI V8
Transmission: 700R4
I remember when those things first came out. My dad went to rent a car one day and when he got home he said that there seemed to be something wrong with it. He said it was really down on power. I popped the hood to take a look and couldn't believe my eyes! There it sat in all of its Iron Duke glory, a 4 banger. We both had a good laugh.
Old 02-15-2006, 10:55 AM
  #14  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (7)
 
aaron7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Neat, yah. Fun to drive... not really. Rare, yah. Worth fixing up, not really.
Old 02-15-2006, 01:45 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
s_d_187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 camaro z28, 83 trans am ws4
Engine: 355
Transmission: turbo 350
Axle/Gears: posi 373
who in the right mind would ever buy a 4 banger camaro a 6 is bad enough but a 4 is that like the super poor mans storts car
Old 02-15-2006, 02:41 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans-Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: WC-T5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.27
6s are actualy not that bad. i can honestly say having driven both that my 8 is as fast when not trying to be fast ( normal driving conditions) as my six at 7/8 throttle. so if you drive around at WOT durring acceleration in a 2.8 or 3.1 they are quicker then a 5.7 at normal cruise. (so a six would win the ole' one sided drag race, you know, where the other guy does not know your racin) AND probably still more fuel efficiant. .....of course when you put your foot in an 8...

as far as dukes... never driven one. but the duke block has less displacement then a 6 and the block weighs more. but they have there niche. it would be a cool "gag gift" for your son who wants a muscle car. picture this, he comes out and sees a buetifull 84 camaro, red, well preserved, all waxed up and shiny with a gian bow on it. you hand him the keys with one of those little "iroc-z" key rings you buy at the auto parts store, he jumps in and turns it on. the exhaust sounds ok, quiet, but ok. he takes it for a spin and WTF? why wont it go fast "well son, your mom wanted to get you somthing fuel efficient, but i know you like camaro's, so we compromised"
Old 02-15-2006, 03:14 PM
  #17  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes on 118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
I have said it before... "Where is the other half of your engine???"

The best thing for a 4 is to buy some Turbo's and boost it untill it pops...


John
Old 02-15-2006, 05:24 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
Krazzycowgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Washington state
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 Irocz, 95 Z28, 71 Z28 /RS
Engine: 355 Tpi, LT1, 355
Transmission: Auto, Auto, 4sp
Originally posted by s_d_187
who in the right mind would ever buy a 4 banger camaro a 6 is bad enough but a 4 is that like the super poor mans storts car
were here in the US were still recovering from the Fuel shortage ( or what was there left of it) plus for federal regs & insurance reasons. GM built the 4 bangers.

thats just like why buy a vette with an Auto tranny in it. its because people couldnt afford the higher priced models of the car but still wanted the car.
Old 02-15-2006, 09:20 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
s_d_187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 camaro z28, 83 trans am ws4
Engine: 355
Transmission: turbo 350
Axle/Gears: posi 373
im just one of those more power guys who allways need to go faster and faster if i cant afford what i want ill just wait a little bit longer and then get something even better, but thats just me.
i could never see any logic in driving something slow my friends would laugh at me for years if i pulled up on gratiot on a nice summers night with a 4 banger camaro
Old 02-15-2006, 10:24 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
82knightrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arcadia ,Ca
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 firebird s/e 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305ci 4b carb.....CFI
Transmission: TH200C....700R4
If I had a 4 banger f body I would make a cd soundtrack of a v8 and play it in my car when I drive .And have the volume full blast
Old 02-16-2006, 10:56 AM
  #21  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes on 118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
maybe if you removed your hatch, pointed the speakers towards the rear you might go faster too

John
Old 02-21-2006, 03:19 AM
  #22  
Member

 
Mikos_89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 459
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: '89 GTA, '15 Camaro LS 6sp.
Engine: L98, LFX.
Transmission: 4L60, AY6.
Axle/Gears: 3.27's.
Everyone likes to bag on GM for offering the "iron duke" in the 3rd gen, but at least GM got rid of the 4cyl option in '85/'86. Ford still sold 4-cyl equipped Mustangs up until the early 90's or something.

I think a 4cyl Camaro/Firebird may be worth something in the future. Look at what some people are demanding for mint condition 6-cyl 1st gens. There are always a few people around who like to "collect" unusual and offbeat things. The old AMC Pacer is one that comes to mind.

If you decided to restored the car, I bet it would garner some interesting stares and questions from people at the local car shows. A fully restored or mint original 4cyl 3rd gen would be a rather unique specimen in the usual sea of modified V8 powered 3rd gens that you usually see at the shows. It would get my attention.

Years ago, I believe there were some aftermarket products available for the 'ole 'Duke including Super Duty race parts you could get for it. But, unless you fabbed up a turbo system and strengthened the stock block (remember, it's actually one half of the thin cast Pontiac 301cid V8), you're better off with something else if you have the need for speed. I believe Pontiac did sell a Super Duty race block that could make over 350hp with the right parts, but good luck trying to assemble one of those today.
Old 02-21-2006, 07:49 AM
  #23  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes on 118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
But you have to also keep in mind the Mustang is not much bigger than a Chevette, where a 4cyl is more than enough power...

F-bodies are larger and heavier than the Mustang, If GM decided to put a 305 or 350 in a Chevette, I imagine it would go like crazy too. In some ways the Dodge Omni GLH & GLH-S were a better match for the Mustang than an F-body because of the Weight.

- oh, one more thing, if you ever have someone pull up in an 80's Dodge Omni that has ground effects, and some letters on the doors, let him go... Those cars will contend with a Gran National...

John
Old 02-21-2006, 08:13 AM
  #24  
Senior Member

 
CYARS92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Various barns
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS, 72 Camaro SS
Engine: 305TBI, til it pukes
Transmission: Auto
Originally posted by okfoz


- oh, one more thing, if you ever have someone pull up in an 80's Dodge Omni that has ground effects, and some letters on the doors, let him go... Those cars will contend with a Gran National...

John
How true John! Those were built in the town I lived in at the time. As usual, plant workers take em for "test drives/debugging sessions" and whooped a$$ on many a 3rd gens, vettes & stangs! Pretty cool seeing hundreds & hundreds of them sitting in the lot too.
Old 02-21-2006, 12:31 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
82knightrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arcadia ,Ca
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 firebird s/e 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305ci 4b carb.....CFI
Transmission: TH200C....700R4
Anyone have a pic of a dodge omni
Old 02-21-2006, 12:53 PM
  #26  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (2)
 
Jim85IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 13,574
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Originally posted by Xophertony
6s are actualy not that bad. i can honestly say having driven both that my 8 is as fast when not trying to be fast ( normal driving conditions) as my six at 7/8 throttle. so if you drive around at WOT durring acceleration in a 2.8 or 3.1 they are quicker then a 5.7 at normal cruise.
That's like saying that a geo going 65mph is faster than a parked Corvette.

However, there is something kind of rewarding about being at WOT during 95% of your commute.
Old 02-21-2006, 02:53 PM
  #27  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes on 118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
You wanted it...

I have heard things about these cars...

GLH - Goes like Hell,
GLH-S Goes Like Hell SomeMore
Attached Thumbnails 4 Banger Camaro!-dodge-omni-glh.jpg  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:02 PM
  #28  
Moderator

 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,373
Received 167 Likes on 123 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
The slogan you stated above regarding the GLH and GLH-S are correct. Those were Dodge's slogans when they came up with the name. The car is fast because it is so light.

A friend of mine had a 4 banger Ford in 87 and a Subaru Justy blew him away. Much like the GLH, it was a turbo charged 800 pound car. They were very dangerous!! Chevy tried combatting the little cars with the Sprint turbo. Too much power for the weight of the car.
Old 02-22-2006, 04:52 AM
  #29  
Member

 
Mikos_89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 459
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: '89 GTA, '15 Camaro LS 6sp.
Engine: L98, LFX.
Transmission: 4L60, AY6.
Axle/Gears: 3.27's.
Originally posted by okfoz
But you have to also keep in mind the Mustang is not much bigger than a Chevette, where a 4cyl is more than enough power...

F-bodies are larger and heavier than the Mustang, If GM decided to put a 305 or 350 in a Chevette, I imagine it would go like crazy too. In some ways the Dodge Omni GLH & GLH-S were a better match for the Mustang than an F-body because of the Weight.

- oh, one more thing, if you ever have someone pull up in an 80's Dodge Omni that has ground effects, and some letters on the doors, let him go... Those cars will contend with a Gran National...

John
Size doesn't always equate with curb weight though. There are some heavy a$$ small dimensionally sized cars out there.

I don't think any fox-body Mustang was ever more than 500lbs lighter than a comparably equipped 3rd gen F-body. No Mustang was ever less than 2700lbs from the factory from what I can tell. The Chevette routinely weighed around 1900lbs, big difference. IIRC, the fox-body Stangs were between 2850 to 3100lbs with the 4-banger. Give or take a few pounds. An Iron Duke 3rd gen, stripped with no options, had to be at the most not more than 3300lbs I would think.

Yeah, those Dodge Omni GLH's/GLH-S's could embarrass some sporty cars back in the day. Pocket rockets I think they called them. The Omni/Horizon were classified as subcompacts while the Mustang was/is classified as a compact like the F-body. Those Omni's ran low to mid 15's bone stock. Pretty quick back in the day. I think the later ones dipped into the 14's on some models. Light as a Mustang? Nope, much lighter. The Omni weighed about 1900-2300lbs at the most. No Ford Mustang was ever that light even the '74-'78 Pinto sized ones. LOL!

The Dodge Omni/Plymouth Horizon are very interesting cars though. They were the first true FWD domestic subcompacts and later formed the basic K-car platform architecture which was used to great success by lee Iacocca in reviving Chrysler back from the brink of bankruptcy. A lot of people give Lee Iacocca credit for the development of the K-car, but the basic platform was actually developed well before he ever took helm at Chrysler back in the late 70's.
Old 02-22-2006, 10:29 AM
  #30  
Member

 
stitchop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Hoxie Arkansas Posts: 12,547
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
I had a Dodge Omni back in 1990 that my dad rescued from a jy, It just need a tune up. Wow, was it fun to drive, you could whip it around corners without ever lifting, I used to drive like a maniac in that thing.
Old 02-22-2006, 08:07 PM
  #31  
Senior Member

 
irocbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Montana
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: L-69 305
Transmission: T-5 manual
depending on local rules an iron duke camaro would classify to run in the compact circle track classes

only way around here ot get a camaro on a circle track

might be kinda fun to see what you caan do with the suspension to go roundy round
Old 02-22-2006, 10:47 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member

 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans-Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: WC-T5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.27
Originally posted by Jim85IROC
however, there is something kind of rewarding about being at WOT during 95% of your commute.
yes, there is! i love driving like a maniac in that thing. llloooovvve the balance too. i feel WAY more confident cornering in that thing then my WS6 equiped 5.7 GTA. way more confident.

on the other hand i have never left a cloude of smoke at a light with my 2.8.

Old 02-23-2006, 07:57 AM
  #33  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes on 118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Originally posted by Xophertony
on the other hand i have never left a cloude of smoke at a light with my 2.8.


If you did its from bad valves or the engine is in need of a rebuild...

OIf course the cloud of smoke would be Blue

John
Old 02-23-2006, 08:17 AM
  #34  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (7)
 
aaron7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I can vouch for how fast the Omni turbos are... because I had a Caravan with the same motor in it (yes, I have burnout pix lol)

I think I remember seeing an article in a car mag... maybe Car Craft, about a twin turbo Iron Duke f-body. I know I have it... but it would take me days to find it!

See page 3 for burnout pix: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/496325

Old 02-23-2006, 11:18 AM
  #35  
Member

 
stitchop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Hoxie Arkansas Posts: 12,547
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
My first reaction is that the van was on fire!!

Thats insane
Old 02-23-2006, 02:35 PM
  #36  
Supreme Member

 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans-Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: WC-T5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.27
Originally posted by okfoz
If you did its from bad valves or the engine is in need of a rebuild... Of course the cloud of smoke would be Blue
John
nah, thta thing is in great mechanical shape. my 350 on the other hand, lets loose witha "chevy salute" on startup. need to replace the valve guide seals.
Old 02-23-2006, 04:37 PM
  #37  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes on 118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Originally posted by Xophertony
nah, thta thing is in great mechanical shape. my 350 on the other hand, lets loose witha "chevy salute" on startup. need to replace the valve guide seals.
I have 10K on a 305 Rebuild and it does the same thing You would think they could do better


Granted 10K, its been since 1998 since the rebuild, but still...

John
Old 02-23-2006, 10:13 PM
  #38  
Senior Member

 
irocbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Montana
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: L-69 305
Transmission: T-5 manual
theres a kid in town who put a stout 350 in a chevy minivan.

talk about good burnouts in a van, i think his tires are like 24" tall
Old 02-25-2006, 10:14 AM
  #39  
Senior Member

 
DigitalMonarch0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 25th Anniversary RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73s for now..
I'm sick and tired of my doggy, boggy old 305... I can't even imagine mashing the gas on an iron duke.

On the bright side though... you would only have to spend half as much on engine parts!
Old 03-01-2006, 08:56 AM
  #40  
Member
 
WckdDudeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I4 equipped sunbird owns all other american I4s... sorry... Especially if it was the 89-90 Turbo 2.0cyl in the Sunbird GT... Mid-High 14s out of a stock engine and light to boot....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
01-19-2024 04:55 PM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
01-10-2020 05:33 PM
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
08-20-2017 12:16 AM
BADNBLK
Auto Detailing and Appearance
15
11-16-2016 09:12 AM
porkenstein
Convertibles
15
08-31-2015 12:54 PM



Quick Reply: 4 Banger Camaro!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.