Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Ca...m=201483442853
If I didn't have 3rd gens coming out of the rafters, I'd definitely look at this one! L98 cammed LB9, T-5 and 3.08 posi seem like the perfect combo for this car. Pictures are kind of hard to look at, they are mostly upside down and sideways.
If I didn't have 3rd gens coming out of the rafters, I'd definitely look at this one! L98 cammed LB9, T-5 and 3.08 posi seem like the perfect combo for this car. Pictures are kind of hard to look at, they are mostly upside down and sideways.
Last edited by chazman; 12-13-2015 at 09:52 AM.
#2
Moderator
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
Not sure what you're complaining about. Just turn your 23" monitor sideways or upside down to look at the pictures!!!
That car appears to be in very good condition. I wish I could buy more.
That car appears to be in very good condition. I wish I could buy more.
#3
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
That's pretty much what I've been doing with my laptop.
Do those look like the factory multec injectors? You'd think the seller would have some way better pics!
#4
Moderator
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
I can't speak to the injectors, as I have no clue. I've never dug into them to know what to look for. John would know that answer more than I would.
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
Bids going up in quickly on this one, (yes, I know it's eBay ). The 'buy it now' is a very reasonable price, if you ask me.
Last edited by chazman; 12-13-2015 at 06:26 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
Okay quick! Someone buy both my white '83 and purple '92 'vert, so I can put this sucker in my garage !
Last edited by chazman; 12-14-2015 at 04:41 PM.
#9
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
The day after I posted the above, I started working on selling my '83 and '92 and buying this car. It all came together a couple months ago. A complex operation!!!
#10
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
Thats a very nice car. Saw the detail work you're doing to it in the other thread.
If that car wasn't such a low mile original I would say swap in some 3.42's. Would be nice to hear it go through the gears with the top down with that 5-speed. Lol some of you guys are converting me over to wanting a 5 or a 6 speed now.
If that car wasn't such a low mile original I would say swap in some 3.42's. Would be nice to hear it go through the gears with the top down with that 5-speed. Lol some of you guys are converting me over to wanting a 5 or a 6 speed now.
#13
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
Thats a very nice car. Saw the detail work you're doing to it in the other thread.
If that car wasn't such a low mile original I would say swap in some 3.42's. Would be nice to hear it go through the gears with the top down with that 5-speed. Lol some of you guys are converting me over to wanting a 5 or a 6 speed now.
If that car wasn't such a low mile original I would say swap in some 3.42's. Would be nice to hear it go through the gears with the top down with that 5-speed. Lol some of you guys are converting me over to wanting a 5 or a 6 speed now.
Honestly, I'd have no inclination to do that. The car is lots of fun to drive with the 3.08s.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
Thats good to know. I've looked at other cars have have manuals and I wasn't sure how well that combination worked out. The 700r4/2.73 combination is great for fuel economy but down on performance and fun. If I find an LB9/T-5 car with 3.08 gears I won't pass it up or start looking for a gear swap right away.
#15
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
Thats good to know. I've looked at other cars have have manuals and I wasn't sure how well that combination worked out. The 700r4/2.73 combination is great for fuel economy but down on performance and fun. If I find an LB9/T-5 car with 3.08 gears I won't pass it up or start looking for a gear swap right away.
The only quibble is the .63 5th gear with the 3.08, basically makes it a highway cruising gear. You can really feel the difference between that and my hardtop with the MK6 T-5 and it's .74 5th gear. Combined with a 3.45 rear gear, 5th is a great passing gear in that car.
#16
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lascassas TN
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 IROC G92 LB9 MK6
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MK6
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
The only quibble is the .63 5th gear with the 3.08, basically makes it a highway cruising gear. You can really feel the difference between that and my hardtop with the MK6 T-5 and it's .74 5th gear. Combined with a 3.45 rear gear, 5th is a great passing gear in that car.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
Thats good to know. I swapped out my 2.77's to 3.45's and it changed everything about the way my car performed. I still wish that all the performance f-bodies got at least 3.23 gears and posi from the factory. Gears and posi really transforms these cars.
#18
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
I agree with Chazman. I have taken 500-600 miles trips with a both a M39 3:08 and the same trip with the MK6 3:42. These set ups are completely different. The MK6 car was a former Texas DPS car and was a blast to drive. Always on the cam at highway speeds it was just fun. These cars are 5.0 eaters.
So often I hear people lament that TPI is done by 4500 RPM. That couldn't be further from the truth with the right combo. My N10 doesn't even hit peak power until 4600 and pulls hard for another 1000 RPM after that. It spins EAGERLY to it's redline.
And yes, I can tell you from experience that it's a 5.0 eater.
Which was especially fun back in the day, since there was nothing to distinguish it on the outside from a common, peanut cammed, single cat, 700R4, 2.73 geared, dealer ordered inventory IROC-Z.
Last edited by chazman; 06-24-2016 at 11:06 AM.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
Very true. The combo of L98 cam, gears, etc., brought this package to life!
So often I hear people lament that TPI is done by 4500 RPM. That couldn't be further from the truth with the right combo. My N10 doesn't even hit peak power until 4600 and pulls hard for another 1000 RPM after that. It spins EAGERLY to it's redline.
And yes, I can tell you from experience that it's a 5.0 eater.
Which was especially fun back in the day, since there was nothing to distinguish it on the outside from a common, peanut cammed, single cat, 700R4, 2.73 geared, dealer ordered inventory IROC-Z.
So often I hear people lament that TPI is done by 4500 RPM. That couldn't be further from the truth with the right combo. My N10 doesn't even hit peak power until 4600 and pulls hard for another 1000 RPM after that. It spins EAGERLY to it's redline.
And yes, I can tell you from experience that it's a 5.0 eater.
Which was especially fun back in the day, since there was nothing to distinguish it on the outside from a common, peanut cammed, single cat, 700R4, 2.73 geared, dealer ordered inventory IROC-Z.
I can confirm when my 350 was stock stock TPI started running out of steam at 4500rpm. Gained some top end back when I ported out the aftermarket intake parts I bought. GM saved certification and engineering capital when they placed TPI on the 350 instead of working on getting more airflow for the larger motor.
Makes sense that TPI would start running out of steam earlier on a an engine that's 45 cubic inches larger than the engine it was originally designed for if you think about it. It's easy to get some top end back with the right collection of parts on a 350 though. The main benefit of TPI is low and mid engine speed torque production and I love it. An LB9 5-speed car with 3.4x gears is just as quick or a little faster than a L98/700r4/3.xx geared car if both of them are 100% stock.
Here is a question I've always had for the 305/5-speed cars. Which car is is faster - assuming both are 100% stock and everything is in good working order. An L69/T-5/3.73 car or an LB9/T-5/3.45 car?
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
Fixed that for you - either my tachs are off on my 91's or they just like to rev but they're nowhere near the end of the power band when the needle sweeps the red line!
Last edited by PurelyPMD; 06-25-2016 at 07:33 AM.
#23
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
I agree! I did all of the free mods on my black car when new. Opened airboxes, airfoil, removed wall behind TB in plenum. It actually pulls strongly to 6K.
Last edited by chazman; 06-25-2016 at 10:15 AM.
#24
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: MN
Posts: 740
Received 103 Likes
on
51 Posts
Car: '84 Z
Engine: L69
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
I had the LB9 T5 3:45 and currently have the L69 T5 3:73. On the street I need to get the RPMs higher before the L69 'makes my ears bleed.'
Of course we all know that no 305 will make ears bleed, or feel like your sinking hard in the seat, but each motor does give some hints of I'm a fast car. Just takes more RPM for the L69. The L69 is probably more tired, and in need of performance tuning.
Of course we all know that no 305 will make ears bleed, or feel like your sinking hard in the seat, but each motor does give some hints of I'm a fast car. Just takes more RPM for the L69. The L69 is probably more tired, and in need of performance tuning.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
I recently had an opportunity to purchase a 1984 Z28 L69/T5 car. I passed it up because the vehicles condition didn't match the pictures that were posted online. Sad as it was a legit L69, just had been run down and not cared for properly over the years. I'll hold out for the right car.
I've got a L98/700r4 car. I would like a LB9/T-5 or L69/T-5 to park in the garage next to it.
Lol when I grow up I want to be like chaz and have a fleet of thirdgens!
I've got a L98/700r4 car. I would like a LB9/T-5 or L69/T-5 to park in the garage next to it.
Lol when I grow up I want to be like chaz and have a fleet of thirdgens!
Last edited by yaj15; 06-25-2016 at 06:20 PM.
#26
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: MN
Posts: 740
Received 103 Likes
on
51 Posts
Car: '84 Z
Engine: L69
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
I agree. Wait for a car in the condition of the convertible, or close. Takes too much time to get these things back to cared for condition. If a better, similar, L69 comes along I'll buy up, provided I don't need to go half way across the country. The nice thing about this one is I can drive it to work every day without too much concern (covered parking ramp). Been a lot of fun twice a day (non-rain).
The convertible is nice. Plenty of nice cars left if you can wait, for less than the final $14,200 bid. And the '84 L69s are a great bargain over the TPI IROCs.
I apologize for the diversion from this nice convertible. Cheers.
The convertible is nice. Plenty of nice cars left if you can wait, for less than the final $14,200 bid. And the '84 L69s are a great bargain over the TPI IROCs.
I apologize for the diversion from this nice convertible. Cheers.
#27
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Another Low Miles IROC-Z! 7500 Miles, Stick, 'vert
I recently had an opportunity to purchase a 1984 Z28 L69/T5 car. I passed it up because the vehicles condition didn't match the pictures that were posted online. Sad as it was a legit L69, just had been run down and not cared for properly over the years. I'll hold out for the right car.
I've got a L98/700r4 car. I would like a LB9/T-5 or L69/T-5 to park in the garage next to it.
Lol when I grow up I want to be like chaz and have a fleet of thirdgens!
I've got a L98/700r4 car. I would like a LB9/T-5 or L69/T-5 to park in the garage next to it.
Lol when I grow up I want to be like chaz and have a fleet of thirdgens!
#28
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
V8Rumble
Problems / Help / Suggestions / Comments
2
03-15-2008 10:46 PM