Engine Masters: Manifold vs Shorty, vs Long Tubes
#1
Engine Masters: Manifold vs Shorty, vs Long Tubes
Not on a SBC, but exhaust theory aside, its probably all pretty similar. If anything, the older Log Style manifolds we have on Thirdgens flows way worse than headers do, so the gains would be larger.
An interesting episode. You can see where the LT's gain the most in the mid-range.
An interesting episode. You can see where the LT's gain the most in the mid-range.
#2
Supreme Member
Re: Engine Masters: Manifold vs Shorty, vs Long Tubes
i don't understand why they tested mid length headers with a 2 1/2" collector, then test a full length header with a 3" collector?
made the whole test useless.
(around 9:45 into the video).
made the whole test useless.
(around 9:45 into the video).
#3
Re: Engine Masters: Manifold vs Shorty, vs Long Tubes
On an engine making 245hp I highly doubt a 2.5" 3" collector is going to make all that much difference anyways.
The length of the primary tube is what set the LT's apart from the others, thats where that mid-range bump came from, not the collector diameter.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Munster IN
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 92 RS, 05 GTO (sold), 10 TL AWD
Engine: 383 HSR w/DSC1
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Strange S60/3.73
Re: Engine Masters: Manifold vs Shorty, vs Long Tubes
yay for having long tubes on my car!........(provided I don't tear them up on a curb)
#5
Re: Engine Masters: Manifold vs Shorty, vs Long Tubes
And I can finally jack the car up from the passenger side now that the Y-pipe isn't in the way.
#6
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: TT LS
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: S60 3.54's
Re: Engine Masters: Manifold vs Shorty, vs Long Tubes
How about the other test they did that found that dented headers function just fine when compared to undented?