Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
Just had to share these pics of an older chevy v8 turbo setup.
I guess its like that to make it more plug and play???
I guess its like that to make it more plug and play???
Last edited by Gumby; 06-24-2012 at 03:03 AM.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
while it can be done this way simply,going blow threw or efi is a much much better way to go
to do a draw threw type setup it requires a turbo with s special seal on the compressor side , its been a while but i belive its a carbon seal not a dynamic seal thats used.
i actually have 2 draw threw turbos off 301 turbo engines iirc
i think the pair of them would be to small even for a stock 350
eventually when i have the spare time i want to build some diy turbines out of them
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DarmCBV_xDk
#3
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
On a carb it's safe. Don't ever try that on EFI. If the hose between the TB and turbo/blower comes off, your WOT until key off.
-- Joe
-- Joe
#4
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
I wouldn't be too afraid of the 301 turbos honestly. The stock engine made 200hp each so if you leaned on them I would think 500 would be not too much trouble. Would be sort of bad *** to pop someone's hood and see a pair of those on a dual quad intake or something and have a pair of air cleaners popped out of the hood. A set of adapter plates would make them mount up pretty easily to an intake I suspect.
Supposedly these can provide an advantage in charge cooling, if one were using E85 or the likes I'd definitely think this. They do have a down side however in the fact that you're bound to the CFM of the carbs. What I mean by this is on a blow through setup there have been people make 1200hp on a 650 CFM carb. With a draw through you have to have some serious CFM. Even the 3.8L draw through cars had the "big" Q-jet for instance, although I believe that you could get the 2bbl for some perverse reason early on.What's interesting to me is that there are 2 kits there, but they don't look like the Accel turbosonic or the Martin kit at all. Any idea on who made it?
Supposedly these can provide an advantage in charge cooling, if one were using E85 or the likes I'd definitely think this. They do have a down side however in the fact that you're bound to the CFM of the carbs. What I mean by this is on a blow through setup there have been people make 1200hp on a 650 CFM carb. With a draw through you have to have some serious CFM. Even the 3.8L draw through cars had the "big" Q-jet for instance, although I believe that you could get the 2bbl for some perverse reason early on.What's interesting to me is that there are 2 kits there, but they don't look like the Accel turbosonic or the Martin kit at all. Any idea on who made it?
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
stole pics from here
Vintage AK Miller Single Turbo Chevy V8 Kit
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=491223
Vintage AK Miller Single Turbo Chevy V8 Kit
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=491223
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,273
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes
on
18 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
Just woundering but woudn't the fuel "sand blast" the turbine over time? Im still sorta new so don't laugh too hard at my question.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
I wouldn't be too afraid of the 301 turbos honestly. The stock engine made 200hp each so if you leaned on them I would think 500 would be not too much trouble. Would be sort of bad *** to pop someone's hood and see a pair of those on a dual quad intake or something and have a pair of air cleaners popped out of the hood. A set of adapter plates would make them mount up pretty easily to an intake I suspect.
i belive mine are stage 1 turbines with .84 housings and 42mm inducer coldside with an ar of .4x
would work really nice on a crossfire engine though
eventuallly the fuel would erode the wheels but it would take a long time
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
In this type of application it's not likely, but a turbo that was not designed for operation with product (wet, suck through) could have some issues due to poor material selection or other factors. At high RPM it does not take much to do damage, I repair the rotors/wheels/impellers for big industrial gas and steam turbines and have see some crazy damage from just a tiny bit of condensation happening at the wrong point in the turbine.
#9
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
depends, the right (well wrong) conditions and you could wreck an impeller.
In this type of application it's not likely, but a turbo that was not designed for operation with product (wet, suck through) could have some issues due to poor material selection or other factors. At high RPM it does not take much to do damage, I repair the rotors/wheels/impellers for big industrial gas and steam turbines and have see some crazy damage from just a tiny bit of condensation happening at the wrong point in the turbine.
In this type of application it's not likely, but a turbo that was not designed for operation with product (wet, suck through) could have some issues due to poor material selection or other factors. At high RPM it does not take much to do damage, I repair the rotors/wheels/impellers for big industrial gas and steam turbines and have see some crazy damage from just a tiny bit of condensation happening at the wrong point in the turbine.
The other thing to consider is that fuel is liquid at room temperature and pressure. pulling some vacuum against the carb would likely help atomization as well preventing the issues at hand. Throw a bit of engine heat at it, and the droplets would likely get a lot smaller a lot quicker.
#10
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
a custom skull head engine cover with a head leaning back with its mouth open where intake tubes go, and two skelton hands each holding a carb up like an offering to the speed deamons. Tubes off the turbo could twist or wind around and look like two snakes going into his mouth.
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Casselberry, FLA
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 88 V6 'bird/89TBI bird/85 T/A
Engine: 2.8/TBI/TPI
Transmission: V8 T-5/700R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open/2.73 open/ 3.27 9 bolt
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
All the early turbo Buicks were wet turbo when carb'd, up to 1984 when they switched to mpfi. Those first "hot air" carb turbos were pretty cool!
The turbo was never listed as problematic so i don't see the harm in running it.
The turbo was never listed as problematic so i don't see the harm in running it.
#13
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
the hot air efi cars use a tb at the inlet which means they should work for draw through too. may be easier to find too
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Suck[not blow] through carb'ed turbo
most early turbos have carbon seals
and i belive the majority of the rotomaster and ray-jay turbos also have carbon seals
these seals are easy to identify by removing the compressor cover then the compressor wheel and finaly the compressor backplate
on the back side of the compressor backplate is were the seal sits its basically a big black piece of carbon that sits in a lil metal cup and its spring loaded.
just be carefull as these seals are very fragile and break/crack easy
and here is another one the carbon seal is number 3
Last edited by project89; 06-28-2012 at 03:57 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
12-10-2019 07:07 PM
New2Chevy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
09-28-2015 12:35 AM
GeneralIesrussi
Tech / General Engine
0
09-03-2015 03:23 AM