Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2011, 01:22 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
onemanrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Just a quick question:
My '89 RS had a much tighter turning circle than my '88 IROC-Z does.
It also didn't make the grinds and groans that the IROC-Z does (specifically a grind on full right - I know, I know, full lock should be avoided but we live in an imperfect world).

So, were the ratios different? If I could the steering of my RS onto my IROC, I'd be a happy man.
As part of my quest to get rid of the full-right-grind I suspect I'm going to end up replacing most, it not all, of the front steering set up, so I'm wondering if I should be factoring a new box to the bill as well.
Old 05-24-2011, 06:35 AM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Originally Posted by onemanrace
JMy '89 RS had a much tighter turning circle than my '88 IROC-Z does. It also didn't make the grinds and groans that the IROC-Z does.

So, were the ratios different?
The a-arm steering stops are different between 15" and 16" wheels (IIRC, the steering box stops are different as well). The wider IROC wheels/tires wouldn't help the the 'pushing/jumping reaction either.

Here's some general steering box info (I'd like to give credit, but I don't recall where I found the info):

• “WS” – 1982-1992 Camaro – 12.7:1 ratio (just like your Z/28, this may be the box that you Z originally had.

• “XH” – 1985-1992 Camaro – 12.7:1 ratio (this box was also installed on Z/28’s and other high performance Camaros; it has slightly more steering effort required than the WS box.) NOTE – I believe this box was used on cars originally equipped with 16” wheels

• “WN” – 1982-1985 Camaro – 14.1 ratio

• “WP” – 1982-1985 Camaro – 13:1-15:1 variable ratio (used in Berlinettas, least steering effort required of all third gen. Camaro steering boxes)

• “JL” – 1986-1992 Camaro – 14.1 ratio (base Camaro steering box)

JamesC
Old 05-24-2011, 12:10 PM
  #3  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Please clarify, if you can, is that supposed to be 14:1, or 14.1:1? ( Not that it's a huge difference )
Old 05-24-2011, 04:17 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
onemanrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Interesting, cheers for that.
Just wondering because I could turn the RS straight into my driveway, but the IROC needs a kinda 3 point manoeuvre to get her in. I guess the 16" wheels and the different stops are the reason why.
Old 05-28-2011, 11:59 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
fishyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Pewaukee, WI
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T5
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

This is really neat. Thanks for posting it.
Old 05-01-2014, 02:45 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
I H8 WWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 89' IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt/2.73
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Thanks for this informaiton JamesC. I am looking into a steering box upgrade and wanted to make sure I don't buy the same ratio box just cleaned up.
Old 06-11-2015, 09:18 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
dennisschreuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA.
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 RS Camaro
Engine: LS6
Transmission: Tremec 6 Speed
Axle/Gears: FAB 9, Floater, 370 True Trac
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Originally Posted by JamesC
The a-arm steering stops are different between 15" and 16" wheels (IIRC, the steering box stops are different as well). The wider IROC wheels/tires wouldn't help the the 'pushing/jumping reaction either.

Here's some general steering box info (I'd like to give credit, but I don't recall where I found the info):

• “WS” – 1982-1992 Camaro – 12.7:1 ratio (just like your Z/28, this may be the box that you Z originally had.

• “XH” – 1985-1992 Camaro – 12.7:1 ratio (this box was also installed on Z/28’s and other high performance Camaros; it has slightly more steering effort required than the WS box.) NOTE – I believe this box was used on cars originally equipped with 16” wheels

• “WN” – 1982-1985 Camaro – 14.1 ratio

• “WP” – 1982-1985 Camaro – 13:1-15:1 variable ratio (used in Berlinettas, least steering effort required of all third gen. Camaro steering boxes)

• “JL” – 1986-1992 Camaro – 14.1 ratio (base Camaro steering box)

JamesC
Hi Sir James, where may these codes be located, a tag on the steering box or inside the glove box? Would a VIN number help? I have a 1987 RS Camaro, just finished sticking a CTS V LS6 into it.
TXs
Dennis

Last edited by dennisschreuer; 06-11-2015 at 09:18 PM. Reason: misspell
Old 06-12-2015, 08:31 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dmccain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,422
Received 721 Likes on 490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Im not sure the part # but I got the fast ratio steering box replacement for my 89 WS6 Formula and WOW what a difference it was from any 3rd gen ive had as far as steering. If I remember right there were several different ones I could order but I went with the performance one that came with my car. But in saying that I replaced almost every suspension part and bushings under the whole car. World of difference
Old 06-13-2015, 07:39 PM
  #9  
Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
RBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,401
Likes: 0
Received 215 Likes on 201 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Originally Posted by dennisschreuer
Hi Sir James, where may these codes be located, a tag on the steering box or inside the glove box? Would a VIN number help? I have a 1987 RS Camaro, just finished sticking a CTS V LS6 into it.
TXs
Dennis
The code (XH, WS, JL, ...) is ink stamped on the box itself. Usually on the far end cover and someplace on the top.

The problem is the ink, it doesn't last. So it becomes difficult to see the code on the box. RPO codes can help as certain steering boxes were dedicated to certain suspension & wheel/tire combinations.

But it isn't the end all to be all, as a different box could have been installed.

Counting input shaft turns lock-to-lock is helpful. So is using a protractor on the output shaft to measure the center-to-lock angles.

RBob.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BlueIroc-Z
Camaros for Sale
7
06-09-2019 03:22 AM
Out-Cast
Interior
4
03-22-2019 09:39 PM
backtothe80s
Suspension and Chassis
33
09-05-2015 12:39 AM
happyhapka
TPI
3
08-15-2015 04:42 PM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
08-11-2015 03:17 PM



Quick Reply: RS vs IROC Steering ratios



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 AM.