Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Koni or qa1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2013, 12:06 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
kcaalarcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Koni or qa1

Looking at getting some new struts. Either koni yellow or qa1 double adjustable. Anyone with any experience or knowledge it have heard good things about either? I've heard a lot of good things about the konis but almost nothing about the qa1. Advice would be greatly appreciated
Old 10-23-2013, 07:08 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Flip 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bethlehem, CT
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1983 Firebird SE
Engine: C5 LS1
Transmission: 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Koni or qa1

Koni's are the default choice here on TGO.
For myself, I would go with the QA1s (or wait for the Viking struts- which should be out soon).
Old 10-23-2013, 07:16 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
kcaalarcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Koni or qa1

From what I've seen most people who want decent struts just automatically go for koni, and I've heard a lot of good things about them. But I've also heard a lot of positive things about qa1. Just not on their struts. Any particular reason why you would go with them? I have a hard time believing that koni is the only company that makes a decent strut/shock
Old 10-23-2013, 07:31 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
paul_huryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Koni or qa1

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the adjustability ***** on the QA1 struts require one to modify (grind) the spindles to work correctly. Koni does not require one to do that.
Old 10-23-2013, 08:35 AM
  #5  
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
dmwracing42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt, Torsen Diff, 3.73's
Re: Koni or qa1

I got Koni's all the way around. I was going to wait on struts/shocks, but Summit had them on sale for like $150 off all 4, probably $100 off the struts, so I jumped on the oppurtunity.

Literally the best decision I ever made. It's like riding on a cloud when i want it to be, and if I ever feel the need to take it out and run it hard, the adjustability is really simple. I don't know much about the QA1, but I do highly reccomend the Konis
Old 10-23-2013, 09:26 AM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
kcaalarcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Koni or qa1

Thank you for your input on the konis, that's normally what I hear about them, people saying buying them is the best decision ever.
And it is required to modify the spindles for qa1 but it think its to clearance for the lower strut body, not the *****. I could be wrong tho
Old 10-23-2013, 03:38 PM
  #7  
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
dmwracing42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt, Torsen Diff, 3.73's
Re: Koni or qa1

Unless you're comfortable modding the spindles then, I would go Koni's. I had no issues on install. Hardest part was removing the top nut on the old struts. Ended up having to use an impact on the left side (right side came off with wrenches). That only worked because it spun the nut faster than the shaft could spin lol
Old 10-23-2013, 04:09 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Jay_rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Windsor Ontario
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: 2005 5.3L, LS6 Cam
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: DTS 9" 3.50 TrueTrac
Re: Koni or qa1

Im going Koni all around just because some guys i know around here blow qa1's on the street. Also my friend has qa1 coilovers on his 4th gen and he said dont buy them unless u get the double adjustable "R series"

Jay
Old 10-24-2013, 10:53 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
UMI Sales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Re: Koni or qa1

Koni's are well known for their sophisticated valving and comfort. They are also pretty expensive.

I've been in direct contact with Viking and their engineers know we would prefer to not have to grind the spindle. Hopefully they can accommodate.

The main benefit of the Viking (and a similar QA1 double adjustable product) is the large window of tuning available.

And FWIW, the QA1 R-series features heavy compression damping even on the low setting. They are to allow a drag car to drop the nose without bottoming. The R-series is a bit rough on the street, kind of like having the **** all the way to the top setting. For street use you'd want the standard single adjustables. The doubles of course can be tuned to whatever you'd like.
Old 10-24-2013, 11:00 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
RWB____s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mo.
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Z/28
Engine: 355
Transmission: Turbo 400
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Koni or qa1

I have just removed a set of Koni yellow adjustable sport shock and struts from my Camaro and they are now for sale. I am going in a different direction with the car and I no longer need them. they are in great shape . they served me well in street duty and autocross.
I just checked Summit and jegs for these shocks and struts. Summit did not list the front struts as even available. The rear shocks were $131ea. Jegs had front and rear shocks and struts listed at over $900. So $400 plus shipping is a fair price
asking $400 + shipping . I am located in south west Missouri.

Last edited by RWB____s; 10-24-2013 at 11:09 PM.
Old 10-25-2013, 11:17 AM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
kcaalarcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Koni or qa1

Well I don't have a problem modifying the spindles at all, that parts easy. And if I were to get qa1s there would be no point in getting ones that aren't double adjustable. I've been reading more in them tho and people say they're good shocks/ struts but they tend to leak and blow out after not long so it's making me lean a little more toward koni. It would be nice to have double adjustable tho.
Old 10-25-2013, 11:59 AM
  #12  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Flip 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bethlehem, CT
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1983 Firebird SE
Engine: C5 LS1
Transmission: 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Koni or qa1

The third choice, that I mentioned, was waiting for the soon to be released Viking struts. They will be double adjustable.
The hope is, they will correct some of the issues with the QA1s. New, they have no track record. I do have a pair of their double adjustable shocks on the rear of my car. The improvement over the Bilstein HDs I had on is huge. Tamed the front a lot, too.
Old 10-25-2013, 02:07 PM
  #13  
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
dmwracing42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt, Torsen Diff, 3.73's
Re: Koni or qa1

Just out of curiosity...Are you Auto-Xing this car or anything like that? If you aren't I'm not really sure I see the point of double adjustable. That being said, to each his own.

My 0.02 is I love my Koni's, but then again the only other thing I've run is 30 year old shocks/struts that I pushed together with my hand when I took them out and then they didn't rebound at all. So I guess anything was an improvement lol
Old 10-25-2013, 05:10 PM
  #14  
Member
Thread Starter
 
kcaalarcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Koni or qa1

Thank you, I will check into the Viking shocks. And my car is going to be a weekend cruiser and driven on the streets somtimes, not a daily driver, but mostly a full rr and autox car so I want as much adjustability as possible with everything in the car and the best performing parts money can buy. Within reason
Old 10-25-2013, 07:42 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
UMI Sales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Re: Koni or qa1

We've beat a few sets of Vikings pretty much senseless with no leaks or other troubles combined with great performance and adjustability. For what it's worth, the debut of Viking (composed of executives from QA1) has improved QA1's qaulity as well due to some healthy competition. For doubles I prefer Viking.

ramey
Old 10-25-2013, 08:49 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Reid Fleming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: SuperRam 350
Transmission: Pro Built S/S TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Koni or qa1

Originally Posted by dmwracing42
Just out of curiosity...Are you Auto-Xing this car or anything like that? If you aren't I'm not really sure I see the point of double adjustable.
The compression adjustability is meant for people who have added/reduced lots of weight from their car. For the majority of people, you want to leave the compression setting alone and just concentrate on the rebound adjustment.

Koni sells both single adjustable (rebound only) as well as dual adjustable (compression and rebound adjustable)...... I run the single adjustable. Less chance of getting things set the wrong way with the singles.
Old 12-14-2013, 09:11 AM
  #17  
Member
 
Homer23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-56 w/hurst short throw
Axle/Gears: unknown
Re: Koni or qa1

I ran Koni yellows on my old Civic and they work great. They greatly enhanced the handling characteristics of that car. With my Camaro, I want to run QA1 because they are double adjustable and aren't used as much by people on this forum.

Both shocks are rebuild-able so buying them used is a good idea if you're not doing any road racing/autocross or drag racing competitions. It's also Eco-friendly. Hopefully you have a 2nd car for when they do need to be rebuilt.
Old 12-14-2013, 09:27 AM
  #18  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (15)
 
Johnny Blaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Koni or qa1

I have seen lots of qc issues with qa1 shocks/stuts. Mostly leaking bodies.

Koni ftw!
Old 12-15-2013, 06:22 PM
  #19  
Senior Member

 
morrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: simi valley, southern cali
Posts: 865
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro Rs.R
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Koni or qa1

look up jri shocks
Old 12-17-2013, 04:23 PM
  #20  
Member

iTrader: (3)
 
Roostmeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 88 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.1L Gen III
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70
Re: Koni or qa1

Originally Posted by Reid Fleming
The compression adjustability is meant for people who have added/reduced lots of weight from their car. For the majority of people, you want to leave the compression setting alone and just concentrate on the rebound adjustment.

Koni sells both single adjustable (rebound only) as well as dual adjustable (compression and rebound adjustable)...... I run the single adjustable. Less chance of getting things set the wrong way with the singles.
Rebound controls the sprung mass (chassis), compression controls the unsprung mass (wheels, brakes, etc). Typically you use the rebound adjustment to compensate for stiffer springs, not necessarily changes in weight.

I am also a believer in more adjustments being just more rope to hang yourself with. I wouldn't turn down some nice double adjustable dampers, but I'd find a good starting point and leave them alone until the rest of the setup is nearly locked down.
Old 12-17-2013, 04:50 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member

 
paul_huryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Koni or qa1

Originally Posted by Roostmeyer
I am also a believer in more adjustments being just more rope to hang yourself with. I wouldn't turn down some nice double adjustable dampers, but I'd find a good starting point and leave them alone until the rest of the setup is nearly locked down.
Agreed.

Most folks don't have the patience to adjust SA dampers perfectly - DA ones make it several times worse to get optimal.
Old 07-12-2016, 08:02 PM
  #22  
Junior Member

 
monkey-leader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Quebec
Posts: 65
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 6.0L LY6 (Vortech Supercharged)
Transmission: Tick Performance T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Koni or qa1

Originally Posted by paul_huryk
Agreed.

Most folks don't have the patience to adjust SA dampers perfectly - DA ones make it several times worse to get optimal.
I used to do those kinds of adjustments all the time on Motocross bikes.

The best is get guy with a video camera to watch you do certain things on the track, its not as complicated as it sounds. You can Youtube how to do it better than i can explain it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
09-30-2018 09:14 AM
Antips16
Suspension and Chassis
10
10-30-2015 06:42 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
10-11-2015 11:51 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
10-08-2015 08:34 PM
tartagliaz28
Aftermarket Vendor Review
5
09-03-2015 08:28 PM



Quick Reply: Koni or qa1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.