rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: 6.0L Twin GTK450
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
I am curious if anyone has done this swap in their 3rd gen. I am currently working on my 89 IROC with a LS sway, I have a UMI K-member. I've heard a lot people talk about the Mustang and 4th gen racks, would any of these work with fabrication?
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,694
Received 746 Likes
on
505 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
Been done. Do a quick search, many topics about it and the limits it brings.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: 6.0L Twin GTK450
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
I've searched but all I find is manual rack conversion, not power
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,694
Received 746 Likes
on
505 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
Most just go manual for drag racing. Power rack would be the same but you have to hook up the psi and return line.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: 6.0L Twin GTK450
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
Gotya, is there any way that i would be able to use the 4th gen camaro rack?
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,694
Received 746 Likes
on
505 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
I think the info is in the threads.
maybe if you have it narrowed and rethreaded
Remember, your turning radius will not be as good
maybe if you have it narrowed and rethreaded
Remember, your turning radius will not be as good
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: 6.0L Twin GTK450
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
appreciate the info man!!
might have to leave this one for the shop though!
might have to leave this one for the shop though!
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,694
Received 746 Likes
on
505 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
I don't think anyone has found a good solution to fix the reduced turning radius yet.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: 6.0L Twin GTK450
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
I've heard guys saying that a 6" radius would be good, whats your take
#10
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 88 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.1L Gen III
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70
Re: rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
Available travel is the first issue with a lot of racks, reducing your turning radius. Our steering arms are ~7" long compared to ~5" in a lot of other cars so it takes more steering travel to move the wheels.
The next issue is bump-steer issues caused by center to center width on most racks. The stock center link is like 15.5" between tie rod centers. You want the tie rods to be close to the same length as the LCA. The greater the discrepancy, the more severe bump-steer issues you'll have. For this I'd suggest using circle track rack racing rack and pinions. For drag racing you can get manual versions as well.
I've been looking into this, but I'll probably run out of time/funds this winter to complete it. I've got an ebay used 18.25" center to center rack I'd like to try.
The next issue is bump-steer issues caused by center to center width on most racks. The stock center link is like 15.5" between tie rod centers. You want the tie rods to be close to the same length as the LCA. The greater the discrepancy, the more severe bump-steer issues you'll have. For this I'd suggest using circle track rack racing rack and pinions. For drag racing you can get manual versions as well.
I've been looking into this, but I'll probably run out of time/funds this winter to complete it. I've got an ebay used 18.25" center to center rack I'd like to try.
#11
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: rack and pinion conversion in 89 camaro
This topic has caused some very dramatic conversation on these boards. There are some that say it can be done (but haven't done it) and other's that say it's impossible to do it right.
I've researched it pretty heavily before giving up and rebuilding my recirculating ball setup with all new hardware.
The issues, as stated earlier, are turning radius and bump steer. You need a rack that has 7 to 8 inches of travel, but is narrow enough that you can have tie rods as long as your current setup. A center takeoff rack solves the second problem, but I haven't found anyone that makes a rack with that much travel. A modified spindle could solve the travel problem by reducing the length of the steering arm, but no too many people are willing to mess with this.
When looking at other racks to try, make sure you get a front steer (the steering knuckle is forward of the spindle) instead of a rear steer (the steering knuckle if aft of the spindle).
If you solve both problems, let us know because there is a lot of interes.
I've researched it pretty heavily before giving up and rebuilding my recirculating ball setup with all new hardware.
The issues, as stated earlier, are turning radius and bump steer. You need a rack that has 7 to 8 inches of travel, but is narrow enough that you can have tie rods as long as your current setup. A center takeoff rack solves the second problem, but I haven't found anyone that makes a rack with that much travel. A modified spindle could solve the travel problem by reducing the length of the steering arm, but no too many people are willing to mess with this.
When looking at other racks to try, make sure you get a front steer (the steering knuckle is forward of the spindle) instead of a rear steer (the steering knuckle if aft of the spindle).
If you solve both problems, let us know because there is a lot of interes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
06-13-2021 01:13 PM
Thomas
Exterior Parts for Sale
21
10-07-2015 05:33 PM
Thomas
Interior Parts for Sale
12
10-03-2015 05:34 PM
hectre13
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
08-26-2015 08:17 AM