Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

weird results with the -1.75" springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2015, 03:11 AM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2QUIK4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI L98
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" with 4.11
weird results with the -1.75" springs

Parts installed: Dropzone -1.75" springs, Founders LCARB, and adj. pan-hard..... Measuring to the fender lip (center of wheel) the car dropped 1.75" on front, and the rear raised .25"??
Other Variables:
C6 18" wheels...Moser 9"... Lakewood LCA's, Drag shocks, 90/10 Drag struts.... Spohn SFC's.. Hotchkis Strut tower brace...

I'm going to install Founders Caster/camber plate for some extra strut travel, and shave the front bump stops a bit...

My question is; What is causing the rear to be so high? IS the lower front lifting the rear because the chassis is stiffer with the SBC's? are the LCA relocation brackets and new panhard lifting the back? Do I need to adjust PHB with the sunspension loaded? Do the springs need to settle in? I don't mind the stance too much but, it looks kinda jacked up in back.
front is 25.75" Rear is 27.75"
Old 05-16-2015, 09:11 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,030
Received 1,664 Likes on 1,262 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: weird results with the -1.75" springs

Yup, happens all the time.

It's not like you buy this box of stuff that says "lower", open it up and pour it out on your car, and the whole car just jumps down x amount closer to the pavement than wherever it was before. People get that fantasy all the time but it just doesn't work like that.

Gotta remember, "lower" is a COMPARATIVE word. In order for it to have meaning, the "new" state after installation (aka "lowered") is to be COMPARED TO some prior state. In the case of "lowering" springs, that prior state they compare themselves to, is NEW STOCK. Your car, being almost an ANTIQUE legally, cannot realistically be considered "new" "stock".

So what happened was, you took out old wore-out sagging used-up stock GARBAGE springs, of which the rears had ALREADY sagged 2" compared to NEW STOCK; so when you put in the supposed "lowering" ones, which are only 1¾" "lower" than NEW STOCK, the rear came UP ¼".

Make sure the springs are installed correctly, not upside-down, as their ends may not settle into their proper place if you did that. You can try removing the isolators, if they're still in there. Otherwise you'll probably need to cut the rears if you want it to sit closer to the ground.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
87v6Bird
Suspension and Chassis
15
07-01-2018 04:12 PM
BWilcox
Tech / General Engine
1
09-20-2015 12:19 PM
sandman92084
Tech / General Engine
13
09-12-2015 10:27 PM
lakeffect2
TPI
1
09-07-2015 03:52 PM



Quick Reply: weird results with the -1.75" springs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.