Global West torque arm opinions
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes
on
39 Posts
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: 2012 LS9
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 60 3.54:1
Global West torque arm opinions
Can anyone with first hand experience give me their opinion of the Global West torque arm?
How is the handling, braking etc.?
Any shortcomings?
Any strength issues?
I posted this a while ago on FRRAX.com but didn't get much info.
Looking for something that doesn't require cutting the floor or my very expensive 3.5" Hawks exhaust.
The Global West appears to have the clearance for my exhaust & retain needed ground clearance for street use.
Most of the UMI/Spohn variants have a rather short arm with a straight crossmember that causes me all sorts of grief.
I'm doing engine mods that will be in the 800rwhp range, so strength is of utmost importance.
Currently car is a LS3/T56/Strange 60, but converting to a LS9 ZR1 engine with heads/cam/ pulleys etc.
Not building a typical drag car, as it is currently my street/corner carver, but it will see the strip at times.
Any opinions are welcome.
Thanks in advance.
How is the handling, braking etc.?
Any shortcomings?
Any strength issues?
I posted this a while ago on FRRAX.com but didn't get much info.
Looking for something that doesn't require cutting the floor or my very expensive 3.5" Hawks exhaust.
The Global West appears to have the clearance for my exhaust & retain needed ground clearance for street use.
Most of the UMI/Spohn variants have a rather short arm with a straight crossmember that causes me all sorts of grief.
I'm doing engine mods that will be in the 800rwhp range, so strength is of utmost importance.
Currently car is a LS3/T56/Strange 60, but converting to a LS9 ZR1 engine with heads/cam/ pulleys etc.
Not building a typical drag car, as it is currently my street/corner carver, but it will see the strip at times.
Any opinions are welcome.
Thanks in advance.
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes
on
39 Posts
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: 2012 LS9
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 60 3.54:1
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
2 weeks & over 100 views with no response?
I thought someone here would have used one of these.
I thought someone here would have used one of these.
#3
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
9 Posts
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: L31 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 D44
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
I was hoping for some feedback as well. I'd like to my the torque arm off the transmission, and this one fits that bill. The Unbalanced Engineering arm is well done, but discontinued 2 years ago.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Double Bratville
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes
on
31 Posts
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: LS2
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: MW 3.42 12 Bolt
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
Now I know why you went with the S60. Boy, keeping up with the Jones's is hard to do!
Global West builds good stuff. I have some. I would not doubt them.
BMR does some one-off custom stuff. Google, "Rainy Day suspension basics" and go to Pro Touring. They discuss some stuff and working with Watts - even Norm (not the guy from Cheers) chimed in.
Global West builds good stuff. I have some. I would not doubt them.
BMR does some one-off custom stuff. Google, "Rainy Day suspension basics" and go to Pro Touring. They discuss some stuff and working with Watts - even Norm (not the guy from Cheers) chimed in.
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of Toronto
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
There are lots of threads on UMI or BMR Torque Arms.....
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
Yes but the GW piece is a totally different design
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes
on
39 Posts
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: 2012 LS9
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 60 3.54:1
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
A few months ago one of my friends asked my advice on buying a low mile ZR1 engine. I told him that I would buy it if he didn't. Well he bought it & then changed his mind & wanted to sell, so I gave him what he paid. I couldn't pass it up.
Unfortunately this also makes me have to start looking for a transmission to hold the power.
Now, back to the torque arm... I was hoping to hear good reviews, with no breakage or other issues. All the other BMR, UMI etc. don't leave much exhaust or ground clearance.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
I have one, but never installed it.
From what I understand and from the materials it is built from - it is a very stout piece. I know of some people using it for road racing and it works better than say a long arm part like OEM. It is illegal for most race classes though.
In your case, you might not be able to get one to fit your application. They make two models - one for the auto cars (700r4 and the like) and one for the manuals (t5) - your t56 probably won't work as the front pickup on the x-member needs to be in a certain place as per design. I don't know if that t56 matches where either the auto or manual versions have their mounts. You will want to contact GW about that before going forward.
From what I understand and from the materials it is built from - it is a very stout piece. I know of some people using it for road racing and it works better than say a long arm part like OEM. It is illegal for most race classes though.
In your case, you might not be able to get one to fit your application. They make two models - one for the auto cars (700r4 and the like) and one for the manuals (t5) - your t56 probably won't work as the front pickup on the x-member needs to be in a certain place as per design. I don't know if that t56 matches where either the auto or manual versions have their mounts. You will want to contact GW about that before going forward.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes
on
39 Posts
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: 2012 LS9
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 60 3.54:1
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
What year is yours for? Want to sell it???
It appears that if I get the 86-92year for a 5 speed it is the closest for my needs. The front mount would be the easiest to modify to work for my application. I'm not worried some modifications, but I don't want something that kills what little ground clearance I have.
This torque arm mount is above the trans instead of below it.
Had one of the other straight crossmember type arms on my Camaro & it actually caught the ground once. It wasn't good for the car, the pavement or my safety.
#10
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,902
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
Isn't Global West the design that eventually breaks through the floor? Mounted where load cycling was never intended to occur.
I have same exhaust. UMI makes a stout mid-length arm with a hump in the cross-bar to clear the exhaust. Also sold as the "Sinister" brand by Hawks Thirdgen.
I have same exhaust. UMI makes a stout mid-length arm with a hump in the cross-bar to clear the exhaust. Also sold as the "Sinister" brand by Hawks Thirdgen.
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
It is for my 1984 Camaro, which is an auto.
If you are interested, we can work something out...
If you are interested, we can work something out...
What year is yours for? Want to sell it???
It appears that if I get the 86-92year for a 5 speed it is the closest for my needs. The front mount would be the easiest to modify to work for my application. I'm not worried some modifications, but I don't want something that kills what little ground clearance I have.
This torque arm mount is above the trans instead of below it.
Had one of the other straight crossmember type arms on my Camaro & it actually caught the ground once. It wasn't good for the car, the pavement or my safety.
It appears that if I get the 86-92year for a 5 speed it is the closest for my needs. The front mount would be the easiest to modify to work for my application. I'm not worried some modifications, but I don't want something that kills what little ground clearance I have.
This torque arm mount is above the trans instead of below it.
Had one of the other straight crossmember type arms on my Camaro & it actually caught the ground once. It wasn't good for the car, the pavement or my safety.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes
on
39 Posts
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: 2012 LS9
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 60 3.54:1
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
Isn't Global West the design that eventually breaks through the floor? Mounted where load cycling was never intended to occur.
I have same exhaust. UMI makes a stout mid-length arm with a hump in the cross-bar to clear the exhaust. Also sold as the "Sinister" brand by Hawks Thirdgen.
I have same exhaust. UMI makes a stout mid-length arm with a hump in the cross-bar to clear the exhaust. Also sold as the "Sinister" brand by Hawks Thirdgen.
No idea about floor breakage... that's why I'm asking for advice.
As far as the UMI, it appears that the cross member goes below the exhaust.
My car is very low & anything below the exhaust would likely suffer a quick death.
Last edited by Lonnie P; 02-18-2016 at 11:08 PM.
#14
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,902
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
Oh, that's not the exhaust system I thought you had. I thought it was the Hawks LS7 kit with V-band clamps. It tucks up.
Yes, Global West is famous for punching out the floor pan.
Yes, Global West is famous for punching out the floor pan.
Last edited by QwkTrip; 02-19-2016 at 01:21 AM.
#15
Supreme Member
#16
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,902
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
No pictures. It came out of my memory bank from 25 years of owning a 3rd gen. Sometimes the memory is good, sometimes it is bad.
We can do a quick test though. My memory is that it breaks out the driver side rear seat tub. Fatigue failure of the sheet metal. So how is that a test? I've never seen a GW torque arm, and I don't even know where it mounts to under the car. I have no way to cheat on this exam.
If it touches the seat tub then my quirky memory should get you a little nervous. If it doesn't then just call me a demented old coot.
We can do a quick test though. My memory is that it breaks out the driver side rear seat tub. Fatigue failure of the sheet metal. So how is that a test? I've never seen a GW torque arm, and I don't even know where it mounts to under the car. I have no way to cheat on this exam.
If it touches the seat tub then my quirky memory should get you a little nervous. If it doesn't then just call me a demented old coot.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,225
Received 149 Likes
on
122 Posts
Car: '91 Firebird Formula
Engine: SP383 Deluxe FIRST® TPI Intake
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" Eaton Truetrac Motive 3.89
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
If it can help. I have a Spohn adjustable. No cutting!
http://www.spohn.net/shop/1982-1992-...nsmission.html
http://www.spohn.net/shop/1982-1992-...nsmission.html
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
Short torque arm acts faster for acceleration, a long torque arm helps stabilize under braking. Best of both worlds is the Unbalanced Engineering decoupled TA which they are currently taking orders for on FRRAX for a limited production run.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes
on
39 Posts
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: 2012 LS9
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 60 3.54:1
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
That is the LS7 exhaust. It is tucked up tight, the car is just very low.
The Unbalanced Engineering arm does not fit 3rd gens without extensive modifications.
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
I don't recommend this option for amateurs.
#21
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
I have the GW short torque arm set up but the car is not on the road yet. I can say there are no issues with ground clearance. It is tight up in the tunnel though and I do believe the torque arm will hit where it is mounted to the rear end. My car is lowered quite a bit and I have a Strange 12 bolt so not sure if stock if it would hit. I dont think there will be any issues with the support bar bolting to the drivers side back floor pan. This is the torque arm reaction support and it extends up to the trans x member so the load from the torque arm is supported by these 2 load point. In an older design I think there was no front mounting point and the load was all transferred to the floor pan mount under rear seat.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Double Bratville
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes
on
31 Posts
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: LS2
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: MW 3.42 12 Bolt
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
I like that pebble reflection in your paint!
You can get the post collector flange pieces up a little further. I'm still wrestling with mine, but I'm trying to fit it around the 4L65e. I used the BMR trak pack. The cross-member bar is only a few mm from the floor pan. Hammered a flat spot on the bar and dimpled the exhaust tube (both). Then added a little button connector for support. I also scalloped the frame rail just a little and moved the trans crossmemer attachment to horizontal rather than vertical up into the rail.
I'll thumbnail a few picks from Hawks to show different stuff. These embedded pics are mine.
Before I changed the frame rail:
Here, you can surmise that the collectors flanges are the lowest point:
You can get the post collector flange pieces up a little further. I'm still wrestling with mine, but I'm trying to fit it around the 4L65e. I used the BMR trak pack. The cross-member bar is only a few mm from the floor pan. Hammered a flat spot on the bar and dimpled the exhaust tube (both). Then added a little button connector for support. I also scalloped the frame rail just a little and moved the trans crossmemer attachment to horizontal rather than vertical up into the rail.
I'll thumbnail a few picks from Hawks to show different stuff. These embedded pics are mine.
Before I changed the frame rail:
Here, you can surmise that the collectors flanges are the lowest point:
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes
on
39 Posts
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: 2012 LS9
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 60 3.54:1
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
Looks like you gained a lot of clearance over the other pictures.
Every little bit counts when you are that close to the ground.
Every little bit counts when you are that close to the ground.
#24
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
Here's a few photos of our 3rd Gen. tunnel mount torque arm installed.
If you don't have tight fitting exhaust there could be some clearance issues!
If anybody needs any info or pricing just give me a call here at the shop.
Craig
If you don't have tight fitting exhaust there could be some clearance issues!
If anybody needs any info or pricing just give me a call here at the shop.
Craig
Last edited by UMI Sales; 02-24-2016 at 08:19 AM.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 1,512
Received 16 Likes
on
9 Posts
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Global West torque arm opinions
That is necessarily tunnel mounted as it as crossmember mounted
Those that have done an LSx swap will need something that provides some exhaust clearance, like the new one from Holley
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/ltx-...ml#post5999646
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/ltx-...ml#post5999662
Those that have done an LSx swap will need something that provides some exhaust clearance, like the new one from Holley
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/ltx-...ml#post5999646
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/ltx-...ml#post5999662
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
firebrdo88
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
8
11-18-2016 03:43 PM
esc
Brakes
36
03-28-2016 11:54 PM
KWKENUF
Alternative Port EFI Intakes
17
03-06-2016 06:13 PM