More Power?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: pnw near portland or.
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 91 RS convertible
Engine: 330 hp vortec 350. TBI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moiser 12 bolt/Wilwood disc's
More Power?
Well it's been awhile but my build is done. Thanks to the help of all you out there. Now I want more power!!!!
I have a crate motor from GM. A 330hp vortec heads. I have done everything to get the HP numbers up. But I am putting 252 to the wheels.
Now I have a 5 speed and the 700r4 is gone. My question is...is there a way to get 50 to 100 more to the ground and what do I have to do? Can a TBI do it? I have a lot of money tied up into the unit. Or do I just need to stop dreaming and put a carb on it?
I'm thinking heads and a cam but... the dyno/tunner guy said I can't support it. The TBI is built buy a guy off here. It is 46mm w/68# injectors sitting on a GM Perf. TBI intake. I also put in a Vac AFPR. With a performance TPI fuel pump.
Thanks for the help
I have a crate motor from GM. A 330hp vortec heads. I have done everything to get the HP numbers up. But I am putting 252 to the wheels.
Now I have a 5 speed and the 700r4 is gone. My question is...is there a way to get 50 to 100 more to the ground and what do I have to do? Can a TBI do it? I have a lot of money tied up into the unit. Or do I just need to stop dreaming and put a carb on it?
I'm thinking heads and a cam but... the dyno/tunner guy said I can't support it. The TBI is built buy a guy off here. It is 46mm w/68# injectors sitting on a GM Perf. TBI intake. I also put in a Vac AFPR. With a performance TPI fuel pump.
Thanks for the help
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,969
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: More Power?
Well it's been awhile but my build is done. Thanks to the help of all you out there. Now I want more power!!!!
I have a crate motor from GM. A 330hp vortec heads. I have done everything to get the HP numbers up. But I am putting 252 to the wheels.
Now I have a 5 speed and the 700r4 is gone. My question is...is there a way to get 50 to 100 more to the ground and what do I have to do? Can a TBI do it? I have a lot of money tied up into the unit. Or do I just need to stop dreaming and put a carb on it?
I'm thinking heads and a cam but... the dyno/tunner guy said I can't support it. The TBI is built buy a guy off here. It is 46mm w/68# injectors sitting on a GM Perf. TBI intake. I also put in a Vac AFPR. With a performance TPI fuel pump.
Thanks for the help
I have a crate motor from GM. A 330hp vortec heads. I have done everything to get the HP numbers up. But I am putting 252 to the wheels.
Now I have a 5 speed and the 700r4 is gone. My question is...is there a way to get 50 to 100 more to the ground and what do I have to do? Can a TBI do it? I have a lot of money tied up into the unit. Or do I just need to stop dreaming and put a carb on it?
I'm thinking heads and a cam but... the dyno/tunner guy said I can't support it. The TBI is built buy a guy off here. It is 46mm w/68# injectors sitting on a GM Perf. TBI intake. I also put in a Vac AFPR. With a performance TPI fuel pump.
Thanks for the help
What does your exhaust system and intake consist of?
Last edited by Fast355; 10-12-2014 at 08:24 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: pnw near portland or.
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 91 RS convertible
Engine: 330 hp vortec 350. TBI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moiser 12 bolt/Wilwood disc's
Re: More Power?
Yea it is a T5 5-speed, and a Moser 12 bolt rear end with 3.73 Wavy posi.
As far as the engine I have the GM performance intake and SS shorty headers a 3" exhaust with a SS Magna flow muffler. No cat.
As far as the engine I have the GM performance intake and SS shorty headers a 3" exhaust with a SS Magna flow muffler. No cat.
#5
Re: More Power?
Ahh. You can expect it to shatter. The typical "World Class" T5 needs to be installed with wing-nuts so it comes back out for repairs easily. I guess the aftermarket has internal parts made from hardened unobtanium; but that gets expensive in a hurry.
#6
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Stanton,Tn.
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Z71 Extended Cab
Engine: 5.7 Vortec
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: More Power?
If this is the GM 350 HO,that cam would be the next thing to swap.IIRC,it's a flat tappet.Switching it over to a roller of even similar specs & more modern profile would make substancial difference.That intake isn't doin you any favors either.You're nowhere near the limits of the Vortec heads,so,they are not holding you back @ this point.That cam ,however'is not letting them perform as well as they could.Also,I seem to remember GM uses a fairly thick headgasket on that on the HO for 9.1:1.You could pick up some gains from a thinner gasket & getting the compression up some.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,969
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: More Power?
If this is the GM 350 HO,that cam would be the next thing to swap.IIRC,it's a flat tappet.Switching it over to a roller of even similar specs & more modern profile would make substancial difference.That intake isn't doin you any favors either.You're nowhere near the limits of the Vortec heads,so,they are not holding you back @ this point.That cam ,however'is not letting them perform as well as they could.Also,I seem to remember GM uses a fairly thick headgasket on that on the HO for 9.1:1.You could pick up some gains from a thinner gasket & getting the compression up some.
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...mble_pie_tech/
http://www.carcraft.com/projectbuild...ckage_install/
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles..._block_engine/
Last edited by Fast355; 10-13-2014 at 06:33 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Stanton,Tn.
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Z71 Extended Cab
Engine: 5.7 Vortec
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: More Power?
I think that engine has the normal .028" compressed gasket used on the Vortec truck engines.
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...mble_pie_tech/
http://www.carcraft.com/projectbuild...ckage_install/
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles..._block_engine/
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...mble_pie_tech/
http://www.carcraft.com/projectbuild...ckage_install/
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles..._block_engine/
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: pnw near portland or.
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 91 RS convertible
Engine: 330 hp vortec 350. TBI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moiser 12 bolt/Wilwood disc's
Re: More Power?
So a roller cam, and rockers along with thinner head gaskuts? I have put new head gaskuts on it allready. I just didn't know what to be careful for when buying them.
What about a new tune? How much Hp will that free up? Which cam? That is a lot cheeper then new heads.
Will the TBI keep up with the new demand?
What about a new tune? How much Hp will that free up? Which cam? That is a lot cheeper then new heads.
Will the TBI keep up with the new demand?
#10
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Stanton,Tn.
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Z71 Extended Cab
Engine: 5.7 Vortec
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: More Power?
Are you currently running on a stock tune?If so,you will definitely see some gains from tuning.Do you not know what thickness gasket you used?The heads are not the bottlenek @ this power level.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: pnw near portland or.
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 91 RS convertible
Engine: 330 hp vortec 350. TBI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moiser 12 bolt/Wilwood disc's
Re: More Power?
No it has a custom tune on a dyno. No I don't know the thickness of the gaskets. The drivers side is orig. and the passenger side is just one I bought at Napa.
#12
Supreme Member
Re: More Power?
what are your power goals?? 2 65# injectors can only support so much.
and with 252 to the rear wheels you are at the limit..
I don't care what the so called "experts" on here tell you..
The OEM TBI system is a LOW PRESSURE system.. and was designed for fuel economy / emissions not High Performance.
You can crank the fuel pressure to the moon.. the 65# injector is rated for 65#/hr of fuel @ 13 PSI... You still only have 2 of them. Increasing the pressure to 23 PSI does not double the volume of fuel the injector can flow.
Listen to your dyno guy / tuner a carb will perform much better for way less money or spend the coin on a 4 injector TBI system.
and with 252 to the rear wheels you are at the limit..
I don't care what the so called "experts" on here tell you..
The OEM TBI system is a LOW PRESSURE system.. and was designed for fuel economy / emissions not High Performance.
You can crank the fuel pressure to the moon.. the 65# injector is rated for 65#/hr of fuel @ 13 PSI... You still only have 2 of them. Increasing the pressure to 23 PSI does not double the volume of fuel the injector can flow.
Listen to your dyno guy / tuner a carb will perform much better for way less money or spend the coin on a 4 injector TBI system.
#13
Supreme Member
Re: More Power?
65 *2 = 130 # hr of fuel..
1 hp = .5 # of fuel per hour (BSFC)
130 / .5 = 260 HP
to support 300 flywheel hp with just 2 injectors they would need to be 93#
you also do NOT want to exceed 80% injector duty cycle.
based on fact not fiction:
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.php
1 hp = .5 # of fuel per hour (BSFC)
130 / .5 = 260 HP
to support 300 flywheel hp with just 2 injectors they would need to be 93#
you also do NOT want to exceed 80% injector duty cycle.
based on fact not fiction:
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.php
Last edited by FRMULA88; 10-16-2014 at 01:12 PM.
#14
Supreme Member
Re: More Power?
remember increasing the fuel pressure can increase the flow rate but it is NOT a 1:1 ratio going from 13 to 26 psi only changes flow rate from 18 to 25.5
and keep in mind the increased flow rate is still limited by the injector duty cycle which should not exceed 80% for safe operation..
that being said a 65# injector is only rated for 65# @ 80% duty cycle... increasing fuel pressure is like a dog chasing his own tail... there is not much to gain by doing this alone..
and keep in mind the increased flow rate is still limited by the injector duty cycle which should not exceed 80% for safe operation..
that being said a 65# injector is only rated for 65# @ 80% duty cycle... increasing fuel pressure is like a dog chasing his own tail... there is not much to gain by doing this alone..
Last edited by FRMULA88; 10-16-2014 at 01:15 PM.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,969
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: More Power?
remember increasing the fuel pressure can increase the flow rate but it is NOT a 1:1 ratio going from 13 to 26 psi only changes flow rate from 18 to 25.5
and keep in mind the increased flow rate is still limited by the injector duty cycle which should not exceed 80% for safe operation..
that being said a 65# injector is only rated for 65# @ 80% duty cycle... increasing fuel pressure is like a dog chasing his own tail... there is not much to gain by doing this alone..
and keep in mind the increased flow rate is still limited by the injector duty cycle which should not exceed 80% for safe operation..
that being said a 65# injector is only rated for 65# @ 80% duty cycle... increasing fuel pressure is like a dog chasing his own tail... there is not much to gain by doing this alone..
The intake manifold choice and exhaust will choke the engine well before a 46mm TBI unit will.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: pnw near portland or.
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 91 RS convertible
Engine: 330 hp vortec 350. TBI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moiser 12 bolt/Wilwood disc's
Re: More Power?
My TBI is custom built and shaved. It has 68# injectors and is 46mm. The intake is a GM Performance and I had it matched to 46mm. I am running a vac. ref. FPR with a max of 25 psi. I have headers 1&7/8th" w" 3" out to a Magnaflow muffler with dual 3" outs. I have all MSD ign.
So a roller cam and lifters will help? What about 1.6 rockers?
So a roller cam and lifters will help? What about 1.6 rockers?
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West-Central
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Trans am
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23
Re: More Power?
I have no personal experience with a 350ci 330hp crate engine, only read from feedback on the internet that they are overrated and the part holding it back is the tiny cam.
It does not take much to make 300+rwhp with a DIY 350ci and TBI.
I am using a 46mm TB with 2x 80#/hr injectors and a DIY ported performer tbi intake (that is still restrictive, dropping from 98 kpa key on engine off to 89 kpa @ 5600rpm), and still certainly making 300+rwhp.
I guess that if you go with something like comp cams 8-500-8 or up (501, 502, ...), tune and fuel the set up you will be braking easy in the 300+ rwhp too.
1.6 rockers will probably not make a huge difference.
It does not take much to make 300+rwhp with a DIY 350ci and TBI.
I am using a 46mm TB with 2x 80#/hr injectors and a DIY ported performer tbi intake (that is still restrictive, dropping from 98 kpa key on engine off to 89 kpa @ 5600rpm), and still certainly making 300+rwhp.
I guess that if you go with something like comp cams 8-500-8 or up (501, 502, ...), tune and fuel the set up you will be braking easy in the 300+ rwhp too.
1.6 rockers will probably not make a huge difference.
#18
Supreme Member
Re: More Power?
you also forgot the details that they needed DUAL TBIs.. (that's uummm 1,2,3,4 injectors) and a blower just to make 575 HP with a big block which is pretty un-impressive because that can easily be done with a 1000 CFM 4150 Carb, or a Dominator and no supercharger.
LOL my small block makes 669 HP with a "primitive" carb and 6.5 PSI of fuel pressure and NO blower.. which really makes that big block a dog by comparison.
There is nothing factory OEM about my setup either but as long as we are comparing apples to oranges I might as well contribute.
#19
Supreme Member
Re: More Power?
My TBI is custom built and shaved. It has 68# injectors and is 46mm. The intake is a GM Performance and I had it matched to 46mm. I am running a vac. ref. FPR with a max of 25 psi. I have headers 1&7/8th" w" 3" out to a Magnaflow muffler with dual 3" outs. I have all MSD ign.
So a roller cam and lifters will help? What about 1.6 rockers?
So a roller cam and lifters will help? What about 1.6 rockers?
the 2 injector TBI system
the crate engine cylinder heads
Cylinder head technology has come a long way, even for Gen1 SBC.
2 injector TBIs stopped being using by the OEMs in late 80s-Early 90s there a reason for that. LOL
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,969
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: More Power?
There you go comparing apples to oranges again. these are not OEM injectors, parts or fuel pressures used in factory 3rd gen.
you also forgot the details that they needed DUAL TBIs.. (that's uummm 1,2,3,4 injectors) and a blower just to make 575 HP with a big block which is pretty un-impressive because that can easily be done with a 1000 CFM 4150 Carb, or a Dominator and no supercharger.
LOL my small block makes 669 HP with a "primitive" carb and 6.5 PSI of fuel pressure and NO blower.. which really makes that big block a dog by comparison.
There is nothing factory OEM about my setup either but as long as we are comparing apples to oranges I might as well contribute.
you also forgot the details that they needed DUAL TBIs.. (that's uummm 1,2,3,4 injectors) and a blower just to make 575 HP with a big block which is pretty un-impressive because that can easily be done with a 1000 CFM 4150 Carb, or a Dominator and no supercharger.
LOL my small block makes 669 HP with a "primitive" carb and 6.5 PSI of fuel pressure and NO blower.. which really makes that big block a dog by comparison.
There is nothing factory OEM about my setup either but as long as we are comparing apples to oranges I might as well contribute.
575 HP is impressive when its happening at 4,800 RPM on pump gas and can run WOT all day long. Marine engines are different animals that car engines.
I do not know many pump gas NA 454 engines that make 575 HP under 5,000 rpm and can run flat out for hours at a time.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,969
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: More Power?
Yes a better cam will help but will still be limited by
the 2 injector TBI system
the crate engine cylinder heads
Cylinder head technology has come a long way, even for Gen1 SBC.
2 injector TBIs stopped being using by the OEMs in late 80s-Early 90s there a reason for that. LOL
the 2 injector TBI system
the crate engine cylinder heads
Cylinder head technology has come a long way, even for Gen1 SBC.
2 injector TBIs stopped being using by the OEMs in late 80s-Early 90s there a reason for that. LOL
#23
Supreme Member
Re: More Power?
Only a neophyte would compare a marine engine to an automotive one.
WOT at 4,800 RPM right... that is no where near the actual RPM limits of the engine which is more like.. 6500+ RPM
Marine engine RPM limit is dictated by the propeller (there is no transmission or differential) and the CAMSHAFT for a marine engine has totally different lobe profiles than one used in car.
Apples... Oranges... got it!?
The heads may have that potential but not with that setup up... you need to burn more air/fuel to make more HP>>>
WOT at 4,800 RPM right... that is no where near the actual RPM limits of the engine which is more like.. 6500+ RPM
Marine engine RPM limit is dictated by the propeller (there is no transmission or differential) and the CAMSHAFT for a marine engine has totally different lobe profiles than one used in car.
Apples... Oranges... got it!?
The heads may have that potential but not with that setup up... you need to burn more air/fuel to make more HP>>>
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,969
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: More Power?
Only a neophyte would compare a marine engine to an automotive one.
WOT at 4,800 RPM right... that is no where near the actual RPM limits of the engine which is more like.. 6500+ RPM
Marine engine RPM limit is dictated by the propeller (there is no transmission or differential) and the CAMSHAFT for a marine engine has totally different lobe profiles than one used in car.
Apples... Oranges... got it!?
The heads may have that potential but not with that setup up... you need to burn more air/fuel to make more HP>>>
WOT at 4,800 RPM right... that is no where near the actual RPM limits of the engine which is more like.. 6500+ RPM
Marine engine RPM limit is dictated by the propeller (there is no transmission or differential) and the CAMSHAFT for a marine engine has totally different lobe profiles than one used in car.
Apples... Oranges... got it!?
The heads may have that potential but not with that setup up... you need to burn more air/fuel to make more HP>>>
Actually if you cannot get the correlation between marine and automotive and the differences that is on you. Its still a 575 HP TBI engine that is nowhere near maxed out. Mercruiser made a 502 with a single 2" bore TBI using a tiny cam, small oval port heads, and restrictive marine exhaust that made 405 HP @ 4,600 as well. That alone tells you that a single 2" bore 2bbl TBI unit will not be a restriction on a 400 HP smallblock.
Last edited by Fast355; 10-21-2014 at 10:52 AM.
#25
Supreme Member
Re: More Power?
Made,,, as in "past tense" what is Mercruiser doing today in the 21st century?!
Perhaps you should have been on the development team for the Hellcat Challenger..
Those engineers must be stupid for not using 2bbl TBI to make 707HP with 6.2 litre small block hemi.
I had Holley 4Di on a "puny" N/A 383 SBC pump gas engine and that made 465 HP @5800 RPM. That was over a decade ago... 405 HP out of a 502 big block is nothing to brag home about... then or now.. LOL
You can keep on dreaming or living in the past but the simple truth is 2 injector TBI "high performance" systems died a long time ago.
I welcomed the 21st century and look forward to picking up my new hellcat in the near future.
Perhaps you should have been on the development team for the Hellcat Challenger..
Those engineers must be stupid for not using 2bbl TBI to make 707HP with 6.2 litre small block hemi.
I had Holley 4Di on a "puny" N/A 383 SBC pump gas engine and that made 465 HP @5800 RPM. That was over a decade ago... 405 HP out of a 502 big block is nothing to brag home about... then or now.. LOL
You can keep on dreaming or living in the past but the simple truth is 2 injector TBI "high performance" systems died a long time ago.
I welcomed the 21st century and look forward to picking up my new hellcat in the near future.
Last edited by FRMULA88; 10-21-2014 at 11:32 AM.
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,969
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: More Power?
Made,,, as in "past tense" what is Mercruiser doing today in the 21st century?!
Perhaps you should have been on the development team for the Hellcat Challenger..
Those engineers must be stupid for not using 2bbl TBI to make 707HP with 6.2 litre small block hemi.
Keep on dreaming.. 2 injector TBI systems died a long time ago.. welcome to the 21st century.
Perhaps you should have been on the development team for the Hellcat Challenger..
Those engineers must be stupid for not using 2bbl TBI to make 707HP with 6.2 litre small block hemi.
Keep on dreaming.. 2 injector TBI systems died a long time ago.. welcome to the 21st century.
Mercruiser builds their own monster now days that is loosely based off a big block and a 32v ZR1. Its an absolute monster, they left anything GM is building today in the dust! All aluminum, 4.57" bore and 4.21" stroke, 4 valves per cylinder, 7.8:1 compression, dry sump oiling, and a pair of turbos. 1650 hp and it has a Gm bellhousing pattern.
Last edited by Fast355; 10-21-2014 at 11:34 AM.
#27
Supreme Member
Re: More Power?
right.. and it's for sale to the general public: I got news for you pal. this is what the "average joe" can buy from them.
http://www.mercurymercruiser.com/mer...selector.aspx?
most you can buy is 450 HP...
BTW when NHRA goes to 100% EFI you can say CARBs are dead.
And even then Carbs are still the affordable choice for the sportsman racer or pleasure driven vehicles.
Anyone else want to feed this troll? because I am done here.
http://www.mercurymercruiser.com/mer...selector.aspx?
most you can buy is 450 HP...
BTW when NHRA goes to 100% EFI you can say CARBs are dead.
And even then Carbs are still the affordable choice for the sportsman racer or pleasure driven vehicles.
Anyone else want to feed this troll? because I am done here.
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,969
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: More Power?
right.. and it's for sale to the general public: I got news for you pal. this is what the "average joe" can buy from them.
http://www.mercurymercruiser.com/mer...selector.aspx?
most you can buy is 450 HP...
BTW when NHRA goes to 100% EFI you can say CARBs are dead.
And even then Carbs are still the affordable choice for the sportsman racer or pleasure driven vehicles.
Anyone else want to feed this troll? because I am done here.
http://www.mercurymercruiser.com/mer...selector.aspx?
most you can buy is 450 HP...
BTW when NHRA goes to 100% EFI you can say CARBs are dead.
And even then Carbs are still the affordable choice for the sportsman racer or pleasure driven vehicles.
Anyone else want to feed this troll? because I am done here.
Last edited by Fast355; 10-21-2014 at 05:00 PM.
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: pnw near portland or.
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 91 RS convertible
Engine: 330 hp vortec 350. TBI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moiser 12 bolt/Wilwood disc's
Re: More Power?
So with just a cam and some roller rockers I can boost my Hp? Won't I need bigger injectors and of course a new tune.
Tell me which cam and lifters. Should I get rockers and a timing chain too? What about thinner head gaskets too?
Thanks
Tell me which cam and lifters. Should I get rockers and a timing chain too? What about thinner head gaskets too?
Thanks
#30
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,969
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: More Power?
Cam, Rockers and springs will boost your HP dramatically but you need to pick the right one. Years ago Car Craft tested the 330 HP 350 HO and added a few different cams. IMO the best cam profile they tested was the LT4 Hotcam, but that being said it is an older grind and some similar aftermarket grinds will easily outperform it.
I would use new GM LS7 lifters and the GMPP roller conversion package. To go from a flat tappet cam to a roller you will need a timing chain as the bolt circle is smaller on a roller cam to clear the camshaft retainer plate behind the cam gear.
Thinner headgaskets work great at improving quench and making a touch more power so long as you use a rubber embossed shim gasket that is .016" compressed. To use these the block and head must be very clean and very flat.
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: pnw near portland or.
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 91 RS convertible
Engine: 330 hp vortec 350. TBI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moiser 12 bolt/Wilwood disc's
Re: More Power?
That sounds great.
So intake, cam, lifters and gear. Maybe there's a kit out there from GMPP.
Where should I look?
So intake, cam, lifters and gear. Maybe there's a kit out there from GMPP.
Where should I look?
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: pnw near portland or.
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 91 RS convertible
Engine: 330 hp vortec 350. TBI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moiser 12 bolt/Wilwood disc's
Re: More Power?
You left me to many options. First off which manifold? 2bbl or 4bbl. Just tell me which one you would buy. There is only one 2bbl but it cost a lot. Is that the best? I'll buy it if it is. The 4bbl has a ton of options.
I have money set aside so that isn't the issue.
I have money set aside so that isn't the issue.
#33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: pnw near portland or.
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 91 RS convertible
Engine: 330 hp vortec 350. TBI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moiser 12 bolt/Wilwood disc's
Re: More Power?
Here's the manifold and adaptor I think I want.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/edl-2912
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/trd-2204
This what I came up with after reading another post that the 2bbl flows better in my RPM range.
now the cam.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/edl-2912
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/trd-2204
This what I came up with after reading another post that the 2bbl flows better in my RPM range.
now the cam.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post