Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

pros and cons to changing to a 160* thermostat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2008, 07:58 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
impaled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1985 Camaro and 1996 Mustang GT
Engine: 350 4bbl/281
Transmission: 700R4/4R70W
Axle/Gears: 9" rear/8.8" 4.10
pros and cons to changing to a 160* thermostat

i did a quick search about 160* thermostats, and found some useful info, but alot of it doesnt pretain to me... i have a holley 780 CFM carb and no computer at all, so what would the benefits be of switching to a 160 thermostat? i heard from one person that it killed their gas milage, but the thread did not state wether or not he had a computer controlled engine (CCQJET, TPI, TBI, etc) because i know that if you change the thermostat it can mess up the computer, but i dont have to worry about that.

i had a 160 thermostat in my old camaro and i loved it because it would never ever get too hot.

i live in florida which is a hotter climate so i am guessing that the 160 would be good in the summer, and it probably wouldnt hurt anything in the cold because it rarely goes below 60 degrees here in the winter
Old 03-07-2008, 10:10 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: pros and cons to changing to a 160* thermostat

The t-stat just controls your lowest operating temperature. If two cars had a 160* and 180* t-stat respectively, neither one should be operating at 200*, unless there was a problem with the cooling system.
The car will burn a bit more fuel when it's running too cold.
I'd just use a 180* and not worry about it. If the car is running too hot it's not the t-stats fault, look at the rad or waterpump.
Old 03-07-2008, 11:31 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
pandin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 vette
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.07
Re: pros and cons to changing to a 160* thermostat

After your coolant temp gets to be 185 degrees. There is no difference in the t-stat. Both would be wide open. The time it would take to get there may be different, but once the valve is open. It is just a open hole. Same size hole, same coolant flow, same cooling.
Old 03-07-2008, 06:43 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
Supervisor42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arab, Alabama
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: pros and cons to changing to a 160* thermostat

Originally Posted by pandin
After your coolant temp gets to be 185 degrees. There is no difference in the t-stat. Both would be wide open. The time it would take to get there may be different, but once the valve is open. It is just a open hole. Same size hole, same coolant flow, same cooling.
That's a good point. Too many people think that a 160° thermostat will make an engine that runs 240°, run cooler. It won't.
My on 160° thermostats:
If you are running a high compression engine and fighting detonation, tooth & nail, a colder thermostat will help. Some.
Colder engines (less than 180°) form more sludge in the oil in the topside of the engine.
195° engines will get better gas mileage than 180° engines because less energy is lost to the coolant and out the radiator. All SBC's had a 180° thermostat "back in the day" until the gas shortage in the late 70's. The factory realized the engines ran cleaner and more efficient the warmer they are.
Best rule of thumb: don't run any cooler thermostat than you have to.
It only wastes money and makes your oil get dirty faster.
Like previously stated: when an engine is at 200° and above, all thermostats are the SAME. Wide open.
Old 03-08-2008, 12:06 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
TADailyDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: pros and cons to changing to a 160* thermostat

So what ur sayin is that 180 thermostats r better, but im thinking of buying a hypertech theromaster performance chip for my 88 T/A. It says to switch to a 160 thermostat. So should i stay with the 180 or go with a 160?
Old 03-08-2008, 01:17 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
Supervisor42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arab, Alabama
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: pros and cons to changing to a 160* thermostat

Originally Posted by TADailyDriver
So what ur sayin is that 180 thermostats r better, but im thinking of buying a hypertech theromaster performance chip for my 88 T/A. It says to switch to a 160 thermostat. So should i stay with the 180 or go with a 160?
195° is best for mileage and keeping the oil clean. The performance chip will maximize performance at the expense of gas mileage. A colder engine will pull in more air since it will warm the air less. The program on the chip is probably set up around the engine staying "cold" (160°) so it can put more gas with the extra air for more power. If the chip manufacturer says use a 160, then use that. As long as you don't expect the same highway mileage as the stock setup you will be fine.
Old 03-08-2008, 03:40 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
TADailyDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: pros and cons to changing to a 160* thermostat

im not too worried about gas milage as it will be a street/strip car but im only going to drive it to car shows and whenever the weather is nice. It already gets bad gas milage with my cat cut out and the egr valve not fuctioning because of that lol.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Exxon Limited
Camaros Wanted
22
12-21-2015 10:36 PM
Ducati900ss
Camaros for Sale
1
09-02-2015 09:05 AM
355tpipickup
DFI and ECM
2
08-19-2015 10:02 PM
perZ
TPI
7
08-15-2015 01:17 PM
Exxon Limited
Camaros for Sale
2
08-09-2015 08:13 PM



Quick Reply: pros and cons to changing to a 160* thermostat



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 AM.