Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2009, 12:20 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

I just ran across this on youtube. Figured i'd post it and get feedback. I personally run ac delcoes and probably will continue to do so since 25 bucks is a whole set vs 1 pulstar lol. Anyways http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYh_qiMKZ3k Seems interesting enough.
Old 11-24-2009, 12:30 PM
  #2  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Found this too. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...19469639870178
Old 11-24-2009, 01:03 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
ploegi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Adrian, Mi, USA
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Interesting. It appears to have a great deal more spark energy.... of course, appearances are not everything. Would love to see some dyno tests, changing only the plugs between runs. Maybe even some long term tests with a look at fuel economy? (yeah, I know, not what most folks on this board are mostly concerned with....)
Old 11-24-2009, 01:28 PM
  #4  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Agreed, the more hp would be nice, but i'm more looking along the lines of a MPG increase.
Old 11-24-2009, 01:31 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
yevgenievich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: college station, texas
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: numerous
Engine: ls1, others
Transmission: t56, others
Axle/Gears: 3.23 7.6"
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcZppUq5foY
they claim hp increase but it's posted by them
Old 11-24-2009, 01:37 PM
  #6  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Yeah, I saw that but I figured it being posted by them it's also extremely biased.
Old 11-24-2009, 01:39 PM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

JC Whitney sells them for $25 each, with a 90-day, 100% satifaction, no questions asked, guarantee.

Who's gonna be the TGO "guinea pig"?

BTW....I want MPG increase too. I live way out in the country & it's a 40-minute drive ONE WAY to Wal Mart, which seems to be on every corner in the cities.
Old 11-24-2009, 01:44 PM
  #8  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Well I'm at work for another 16 days. After that I may fork over the dough and try them out . I can always return them. I suppose 200$ is worth a mpg and hp increase. The mpg increase in it's self at this point would pay for them in no time. Maybe i'll try one out in my Ninja assuming they make them for motorcycles too.
Old 11-24-2009, 01:49 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
ploegi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Adrian, Mi, USA
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Originally Posted by yevgenievich
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcZppUq5foY
they claim hp increase but it's posted by them
This video doesn't seem to be about the pulsar plugs, but, some black box between the distributor, and the spark plugs, I think it noted that they were just using resistor plugs?

Interesting though. Wonder what it is REALLY doing.......
Old 11-24-2009, 01:52 PM
  #10  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

I think those are plasma plugs and need that box to power them where as The actual pulstar plug has the plasma thing built into them, hence the 25$ a plug. I remember seeing the in popular mechanics I believe it was and it indeed was an interesting design.
Old 11-24-2009, 01:58 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
ploegi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Adrian, Mi, USA
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

At 25 bucks a pop, they would have to give a DRAMATIC increase in power/economy for them to be even remotely worthwhile.... Wonder how long they last, that would be a major consideration as well....... 200 bucks for PLUGS?!?!?!! I generally don't spend that much on a complete tuneup.... (doing all the work myself though.)
Old 11-24-2009, 02:06 PM
  #12  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Well the advanceautoparts site says they come with a 4 year replacement warrenty. Apparently the version for our cars is gapped at .35 also instead of the usual .45
Old 11-24-2009, 02:08 PM
  #13  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (2)
 
300hpse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Trans Am
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: factory T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 limited slip
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

So at an extra $175 for a set of plugs for an 8 cylinder, in order to regain the cost in gas milage saved, lets see how much you would need to drive.

Say a standard plug gets you 15/25 and the pulstar gives you a very optimistic 10% increase in economy to 16.5/27.5. Lets pretend you drive half city, half highway. Regular plug gives you 20 mpg on your 16 gallon tank, you will 320 miles out of that tank. Pulstar gives you 22 mpgs on the same tank, giving you 352 miles. On one tank of gas, you saved 32 miles worth of gas, or 1.6 gallons of gas. At an average of $2.50 per gallon, that's $4 savings in gas youve saved by time you fill up. The average use of a car being considered 12k miles per year, you would use 600 gallons of gas, or $1500 on regular plugs, or 545 gallons and $1363 on pulstars. Pulstars would save you $137 over the course of the year compared to the extra $175 you spent on them. This is all assuming a 10% increase in fuel efficiency, which lets face it, is totally unrealistic.

Lets shorten up the calculations and see what other efficieny increases give us. A 5% increase (still a bit unrealistic) gives us a yearly savings of $72, a 3% increase gives us a savings of $43 and a most realistic 2% (imo) gives us a savings of $29 yearly.

So in order to break even, the plugs would need a lifespan (lifespan being operational life span maintaining 100% of their original power in this example to simplify) of 1.3 years at 10% efficiency, 2.6 at 5%, 4 years at 3% and a whopping 6 years at 2%.

I would wonder too if the extra energy these put out is wasted, eventually you reach a point where adding more spark energy has absolutely no effect on efficiency.

Anyway, I was just bored and thought Id throw out some math to pass some time lol. I dont claim to know what Im talking about .

To me personally, Id spend that 175 extra bucks about 10000 other places than sparkier spark plugs.
Old 11-24-2009, 02:17 PM
  #14  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Lmao, Nice. I'll probably try one in my bike for ***** n giggles. Then go from there. Considering it's a single cylinder 250, I'm assuming if there are to be any noticeable gains i'll see it there.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gta892000
TPI
13
08-11-2019 11:16 AM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
36
01-03-2016 01:26 PM
eustodp
Electronics
8
09-20-2015 05:09 PM
buckshot63
Camaros for Sale
0
09-10-2015 09:15 AM
rsrookie
Camaros for Sale
0
09-05-2015 07:08 PM



Quick Reply: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.