Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Performer VS Performer RPM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2009, 09:29 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
RK82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Summerland, B.C
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans am
Engine: 383
Transmission: AGE M22Z
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 detroit locker
Performer VS Performer RPM

I have a edelbrock performer EPS on my car now, my buddy gave me a Performer RPM. My question is will it be worth changing intakes?, will I even notice a difference? my car is a 82 firebird with a 305 LE9 out of a 84 chevy 1/2 ton truck, its got a 1805 Edelbrock carb, flowtech 1" 5/8 headers and 3" exhaust with a flowmaster muffler.
Old 11-25-2009, 09:37 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

probably wont notice a difference.
Old 11-25-2009, 10:25 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
camaronewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cary, North Carolina
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

I thought most TGO folks agreed that the Performer wasn't worth the money, but the Performer RPM was the intake of choice? At least that's what I read over the years.
Old 11-26-2009, 03:43 PM
  #4  
Member
 
bakes85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 trans am
Engine: 1969 chevy 350 .060 over
Transmission: 5spd
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

correct me if im wrong, but isnt the only difference in edelbrock's intakes the operating RPM they are designed for?
Old 11-26-2009, 06:48 PM
  #5  
Member

Thread Starter
 
RK82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Summerland, B.C
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans am
Engine: 383
Transmission: AGE M22Z
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 detroit locker
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

Originally Posted by camaronewbie
I thought most TGO folks agreed that the Performer wasn't worth the money, but the Performer RPM was the intake of choice? At least that's what I read over the years.
Thats what I thought.
Old 11-26-2009, 07:30 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High plains of NM
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

That is what I thought also.
Old 11-27-2009, 01:07 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Irockz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Springfield,Mo
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Berlinetta,work in progress
Engine: 468 BB,still in the build process
Transmission: TH350,3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 9" Ford,learning how to live under
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

The Performer is an entry level intake,that is a little better than stock,but not a whole lot.The Performer RPM is a much better flowing intake,with more hp potential.However,on a stock 305 without any other modifications,I doubt you'd see any noticable gain,and you might even see a small loss in off idle performance.Intakes are like any other part of an engine,bigger does not always mean better.
Old 11-27-2009, 04:31 PM
  #8  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

Originally Posted by bakes85
correct me if im wrong, but isnt the only difference in edelbrock's intakes the operating RPM they are designed for?
Right, runner size shape and length totally different, meaning it's a totally different intake.

I actually measured my performer non-rpm today, and the port size is 1.2x1.9, so it's a bit smaller than a 1205 gasket which is considered a hot street port.

For comparison sake, a stock TPI baseplate is 1.20x1.96, so the performer is close to stock.

I'm assuming the RPM is spot-on at 1.20x2.04 which is what similar performance manifolds measure out at, but I don't have one to measure.

-- Joe
Old 11-28-2009, 08:10 AM
  #9  
SSC
Supreme Member

 
SSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pueblo Co
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: No more birdy
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

I glanced at a performer EPS once. Looked like a slightly smaller version of the RPM wasnt to interested in comparing it to a stock performer which just by glance it was larger. The RPM is considered a high performance dual plane intake. The perforomer and EPS are stock replacments the EPS is middle of the road from what ive read with slightly better flow then a performer intake. The RPM is a great intake I run one on my bird and I use it for a DD and I have had great results with it.
Old 11-28-2009, 10:35 AM
  #10  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

I currently run that intake on my l69 305. When I swapped over to it I really didn't notice a whole lot of gain over my original intake tho.
Old 11-29-2009, 03:15 AM
  #11  
Member

Thread Starter
 
RK82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Summerland, B.C
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans am
Engine: 383
Transmission: AGE M22Z
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 detroit locker
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

Originally Posted by Ivelostcontact
I currently run that intake on my l69 305. When I swapped over to it I really didn't notice a whole lot of gain over my original intake tho.
EPS or RPM intake?
Old 11-29-2009, 10:39 PM
  #12  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt
Re: Performer VS Performer RPM

The performer rpm. I imagine you'll have a little bit of gain but nothing drastic. Probably 6 or 7 more hp and 2 or 3lb torque. If you already have it and it's a sunny day might as well go ahead and put it on but don't expect to be blown away by the results. It is a good intake tho. Also your powerband will probably shift up 500ish rpms.

Last edited by Ivelostcontact; 11-29-2009 at 10:44 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
12-10-2019 07:07 PM
IROCtometal
TPI
2
09-20-2015 11:08 PM
IROCtometal
TPI
3
09-09-2015 10:01 AM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
09-02-2015 07:28 PM



Quick Reply: Performer VS Performer RPM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.