Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

is this too much cam for me???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2015, 03:49 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
beastin91rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is this too much cam for me???

So due to time and budget constraints I'm building the L03 305 up a little bit. My buddy has a new cam that i can have for free so it will help me alot if it will work. The cam is a comp 280h magnum single pattern 230 duration, .480 lift and 110 lobe seperation. I know i already have a roller setup but free is free and i have the flat tappet lifters and pushrods already. My question is will this be too much cam for a 305? It will be the stock bottom end, mildly ported 187 heads, edelbrock 650 cfm carb, edelbrock performer rpm intake, msd ready to run pro billet distributor, headers and true dual exhaust. My main concern would be that they say the compression ratio is an optimistic 9.3-1, i have the 308 gears right now which are being swapped for 342s shortly. Please help i miss my car and need to get it back together!
Old 08-20-2015, 04:31 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,844
Received 212 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: is this too much cam for me???

WAAAAAAAAAAAY too much cam.

Like so much cam you'll go SLOWER than a stock L03.

An otherwise stock 305 will choke that cam and run like crap.

I have a 231/239 in my GTA, you can listen to the clips from the sig links.

Last edited by Thirdgen89GTA; 08-20-2015 at 04:35 PM.
Old 08-20-2015, 08:25 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
beastin91rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA
WAAAAAAAAAAAY too much cam.

Like so much cam you'll go SLOWER than a stock L03.

An otherwise stock 305 will choke that cam and run like crap.

I have a 231/239 in my GTA, you can listen to the clips from the sig links.
Thanks for the input. What would you recommend. I want to go as big as possible without losing performance
Old 08-20-2015, 08:52 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,844
Received 212 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by beastin91rs
Thanks for the input. What would you recommend. I want to go as big as possible without losing performance
Its so hard to recommend a cam to people unless its way out there. Not only is there the parts involved, but what is acceptable to you the owner.

But for what you describing having, I don't think you should really go beyond the durations found in stock LT1 and L98 cams. Stay under 210° intake duration at .050 with a small LSA. You will need a split duration cam. Probably 10° or so more exhaust duration than intake because your heads have poor exhaust flow.

But more than that. In a another thread you may find people who disagree and say that 210° is too small. It really all depends on what you want, and what you are willing to sacrifice.
Old 08-21-2015, 01:43 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
Night rider327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bowdon, GA.
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: is this too much cam for me???

204/214 @.050" with a 112 lsa. Something like one of the elgin cam kits for $80
Old 08-21-2015, 07:21 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dmccain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,422
Received 721 Likes on 490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Summit K1102, 1103 at the most.
Old 08-21-2015, 08:21 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
beastin91rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Thanks guys. Id be willing to sacrifice some at the bottom end to get more mid and top end if that helps. Also the cars a 5 speed. What kind of performance gains could i expect going with something like the lt1 or l98 cam?
Old 08-21-2015, 08:45 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dmccain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,422
Received 721 Likes on 490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: is this too much cam for me???

That depends on how good of job on the head porting because stock these heads really hurt the cars performance. I wouldn't expect more than 200-220 HP. Stock LB9 range maybe. But again a lot of it depends on the heads.
Old 10-08-2015, 02:07 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Valve Motion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: is this too much cam for me???

This would be one of those perfect examples to run through my software. If you have port flows for the heads and the rest of the normal engine parameters. I'll run your numbers and post the results. message me or post them.
Old 10-08-2015, 02:07 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,982
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by Valve Motion
This would be one of those perfect examples to run through my software. If you have port flows for the heads and the rest of the normal engine parameters. I'll run your numbers and post the results. message me or post them.
Rick I can get those numbers for you.

I really like the Elgin 210/215 @ .050 roller can in a stock internal L03. It is 210/215 @ .050, .462/.470" lift, 110° LSA on a 106° ICL.
Old 10-08-2015, 02:10 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,982
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by dmccain
That depends on how good of job on the head porting because stock these heads really hurt the cars performance. I wouldn't expect more than 200-220 HP. Stock LB9 range maybe. But ageain a lot of it depends on the heads.
^^^^LMAO.....I love the false information kicked out on these heads practically everywhere. Stock swirl port 305 heads EASILY support 250-275 hp at the crank when cammed correctly. It is the stock cam and exhaust that is the major strangle hold.
Old 10-08-2015, 03:04 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
Valve Motion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by Fast355
Rick I can get those numbers for you.

I really like the Elgin 210/215 @ .050 roller can in a stock internal L03. It is 210/215 @ .050, .462/.470" lift, 110° LSA on a 106° ICL.
Post the bore, stroke, rod length, compression, valve diameters, port flows at .400" and .500" lift, bench pressure (in/h2o), rocker ratios, hydr or mech cam, lash if mech, and the RPM you want maximum horsepower to occur (Max-HP RPM).
Old 10-08-2015, 04:37 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,982
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by Valve Motion
Post the bore, stroke, rod length, compression, valve diameters, port flows at .400" and .500" lift, bench pressure (in/h2o), rocker ratios, hydr or mech cam, lash if mech, and the RPM you want maximum horsepower to occur (Max-HP RPM).
3.735 bore
3.48 stroke
5.7" rod
9.3:1 c/r
1.84" intake
1.5" exhaust

28 in/h20
Intake @ .400" 158 cfm
Intake @ .500" 165 cfm

Exhaust @ .400" 133 cfm
Exhaust @ .500" 140 cfm

1.5:1 rocker ratio

Hydraulic Roller cam (Zero lash)

Stock drivetrain and short block would want the peak power between 4,500 and 5,000 rpm with shift points about 10% over

Edit- I have always felt people use the wrong cam with these heads and then wonder why they don't run well with a huge intake/exhaust duration, massive duration and lift split on a wider LSA. I feel these heads run best with a mild duration/lift bump, nearly square pattern grind, tighter LSAs and advanced valve timing. In a carbureted 10.4:1 350 application I actually ran a 282/282 @ .004, 224/224 @ .050, .480/.480" lift, 106* LSA, 102* ICL cam and it was a torque making monster.

Last edited by Fast355; 10-08-2015 at 04:47 PM.
Old 10-08-2015, 05:00 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
Valve Motion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by Fast355
3.735 bore
3.48 stroke
5.7" rod
9.3:1 c/r
1.84" intake
1.5" exhaust

28 in/h20
Intake @ .400" 158 cfm
Intake @ .500" 165 cfm

Exhaust @ .400" 133 cfm
Exhaust @ .500" 140 cfm

1.5:1 rocker ratio

Hydraulic Roller cam (Zero lash)

Stock drivetrain and short block would want the peak power between 4,500 and 5,000 rpm with shift points about 10% over

Edit- I have always felt people use the wrong cam with these heads and then wonder why they don't run well with a huge intake/exhaust duration, massive duration and lift split on a wider LSA. I feel these heads run best with a mild duration/lift bump, nearly square pattern grind, tighter LSAs and advanced valve timing. In a carbureted 10.4:1 350 application I actually ran a 282/282 @ .004, 224/224 @ .050, .480/.480" lift, 106* LSA, 102* ICL cam and it was a torque making monster.
That is enough information to determine the cam. Good thing you didn't want to turn it with those ports.
Attached Thumbnails is this too much cam for me???-fast355.png  
Old 10-08-2015, 05:01 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
Valve Motion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: is this too much cam for me???

I took a little liberty with the RPM
Old 10-08-2015, 06:43 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,982
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by Valve Motion
I took a little liberty with the RPM
Can you run a few more???

With the 305 use a pair of TPI heads.

Intake @ .400 182
Intake @ .500 195
Exhaust @ .400 107
Exhaust @ .500 110

Also same setup as above except a 350 with a 4.00" bore, 1.94" intake valve, with a hydraulic flat tappet cam (truck) and roller cam (car)

193 TBI head
Intake @ .400 172
Intake @ .500 178

Exhaust @ .400 140
Exhaust @ .500 146

Not that I think it will make much difference, but these engines have a 9.025" deck height, .028" compressed head gasket, and 12cc dished pistons. 305 uses a 56-58cc head and the 350 head comes in at 65cc.
Old 10-08-2015, 06:48 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,982
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by Valve Motion
That is enough information to determine the cam. Good thing you didn't want to turn it with those ports.
These engines are more GRUNT engines than anything and for good reason. With the ~26" tall tires and 2.73 rear axle gears of the automatic cars they are moving ~45 mph in 1st shifting at ~5,200 and 90 mph shifting out of 2nd. The factory torque converter stalls in the 1,400-1,600 rpm range as well.
Old 10-08-2015, 11:35 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
Valve Motion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by Fast355
Can you run a few more???

With the 305 use a pair of TPI heads.

Intake @ .400 182
Intake @ .500 195
Exhaust @ .400 107
Exhaust @ .500 110

Also same setup as above except a 350 with a 4.00" bore, 1.94" intake valve, with a hydraulic flat tappet cam (truck) and roller cam (car)

193 TBI head
Intake @ .400 172
Intake @ .500 178

Exhaust @ .400 140
Exhaust @ .500 146

Not that I think it will make much difference, but these engines have a 9.025" deck height, .028" compressed head gasket, and 12cc dished pistons. 305 uses a 56-58cc head and the 350 head comes in at 65cc.
Only one.
Old 10-09-2015, 07:38 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,982
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: is this too much cam for me???

Originally Posted by Valve Motion
Only one.
Lets do the 350 with a hydraulic roller cam. It is the common engine to run after swapping out the L03.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Prodigious
Theoretical and Street Racing
35
04-13-2021 02:37 PM
slowsi
Tech / General Engine
10
10-18-2015 08:49 PM
Jorlain
Tech / General Engine
6
10-08-2015 01:57 AM
customblackbird
Power Adders
71
10-01-2015 04:30 PM
Strick1
LTX and LSX
2
09-04-2015 07:11 AM



Quick Reply: is this too much cam for me???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.