383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
So, it's understood that optimal quench is .040".
Is it more desirable to have a piston 'in the hole' say .010" and a head gasket close to .030", or a zero deck and a head gasket close to .040"?
Is it more desirable to have a piston 'in the hole' say .010" and a head gasket close to .030", or a zero deck and a head gasket close to .040"?
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,050
Received 1,672 Likes
on
1,269 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
The latter.
Some modern engines (N* for example) actually put the piston ABOVE the deck, stock.
Some modern engines (N* for example) actually put the piston ABOVE the deck, stock.
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
I'd say the former, especially if it's a high end build with a lot of work to the block that you may want to take advantage of again on a subsequent rebuild. Plus, even on your present build, mistakes do happen, and it's nice to have a second shot at it. No sense in cutting more off the decks than necessary to equalize their height and square them to the bore. There's no performance or durability benefit to having them out of the hole.
If it's just a cheap build and you're certain you'll never go back into it for a rebuild, then it's not a big deal either way.
And BTW, optimum quench is actually less than .040"; however, .040" is a common target that keeps everyone out of trouble even for crooked blocks with varying deck clearance cylinder to cylinder. I'm targeting .032" on my current LT1 build.
If it's just a cheap build and you're certain you'll never go back into it for a rebuild, then it's not a big deal either way.
And BTW, optimum quench is actually less than .040"; however, .040" is a common target that keeps everyone out of trouble even for crooked blocks with varying deck clearance cylinder to cylinder. I'm targeting .032" on my current LT1 build.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
I'd say the former, especially if it's a high end build with a lot of work to the block that you may want to take advantage of again on a subsequent rebuild. Plus, even on your present build, mistakes do happen, and it's nice to have a second shot at it. No sense in cutting more off the decks than necessary to equalize their height and square them to the bore. There's no performance or durability benefit to having them out of the hole.
If it's just a cheap build and you're certain you'll never go back into it for a rebuild, then it's not a big deal either way.
And BTW, optimum quench is actually less than .040"; however, .040" is a common target that keeps everyone out of trouble even for crooked blocks with varying deck clearance cylinder to cylinder. I'm targeting .032" on my current LT1 build.
If it's just a cheap build and you're certain you'll never go back into it for a rebuild, then it's not a big deal either way.
And BTW, optimum quench is actually less than .040"; however, .040" is a common target that keeps everyone out of trouble even for crooked blocks with varying deck clearance cylinder to cylinder. I'm targeting .032" on my current LT1 build.
So....050" quench a 'no go' for a 500HP 11:1 compression engine build?
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
That big .050" quench clearance isn't a good idea for high compression.
Go with something like this:
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/f...make/chevrolet
Even with the slight increase in compression, your detonation resistance and tuning window will improve. It will require less timing for best power.
11:1 is pushing it for a pump gas Gen1 SBC. What heads and cam are you going to use?
Have you purchased the pistons and heads already?
Go with something like this:
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/f...make/chevrolet
Even with the slight increase in compression, your detonation resistance and tuning window will improve. It will require less timing for best power.
11:1 is pushing it for a pump gas Gen1 SBC. What heads and cam are you going to use?
Have you purchased the pistons and heads already?
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
That big .050" quench clearance isn't a good idea for high compression.
Go with something like this:
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/f...make/chevrolet
Even with the slight increase in compression, your detonation resistance and tuning window will improve. It will require less timing for best power.
11:1 is pushing it for a pump gas Gen1 SBC. What heads and cam are you going to use?
Have you purchased the pistons and heads already?
Go with something like this:
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/f...make/chevrolet
Even with the slight increase in compression, your detonation resistance and tuning window will improve. It will require less timing for best power.
11:1 is pushing it for a pump gas Gen1 SBC. What heads and cam are you going to use?
Have you purchased the pistons and heads already?
I have a Scat forged and balanced rotating assembly, including 6" H-beam rods, crank, pistons and flexplate.
The heads I just got in are competition ported AFR210's.
The cam I'm planning first installing is a CompCams 292XFI.
Exhaust will be 1 3/4" longtube headers by OBX racers.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
I didn't see that FelPro gasket, you mentioned, originally when I was searching on Summit. I only saw their .041" thick gasket. But I like your choice. I was also looking at Cometic head gaskets. A friend (Honda builder) swears by Cometic. But since I have an iron block and aluminum heads, I wonder...
Last edited by UltRoadWarrior9; 08-24-2016 at 10:03 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
I don't see an issue with the Cometics on iron block / al heads. I've seen lots of successful builds with them.
With a big cam like the 292, you shouldn't have any problem with pump fuel, even if your SCR ends up a couple of tenths above 11:1. I hope you have plans for a stout valvetrain. Those XFI lobes are hell on springs! With the ported 210's, I assume you'll be revving above 6500, in which case I'd advise about 160 lbs on the seat.
If it were mine, I'd be calling Lloyd Elliott and getting a custom cam in lieu of the XFI. Proabably about the same cost. and he'll guide you better than I can regarding valvetrain requirements. www.elliottsportworks.com
With a big cam like the 292, you shouldn't have any problem with pump fuel, even if your SCR ends up a couple of tenths above 11:1. I hope you have plans for a stout valvetrain. Those XFI lobes are hell on springs! With the ported 210's, I assume you'll be revving above 6500, in which case I'd advise about 160 lbs on the seat.
If it were mine, I'd be calling Lloyd Elliott and getting a custom cam in lieu of the XFI. Proabably about the same cost. and he'll guide you better than I can regarding valvetrain requirements. www.elliottsportworks.com
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
I don't see an issue with the Cometics on iron block / al heads. I've seen lots of successful builds with them.
With a big cam like the 292, you shouldn't have any problem with pump fuel, even if your SCR ends up a couple of tenths above 11:1. I hope you have plans for a stout valvetrain. Those XFI lobes are hell on springs! With the ported 210's, I assume you'll be revving above 6500, in which case I'd advise about 160 lbs on the seat.
If it were mine, I'd be calling Lloyd Elliott and getting a custom cam in lieu of the XFI. Proabably about the same cost. and he'll guide you better than I can regarding valvetrain requirements. www.elliottsportworks.com
With a big cam like the 292, you shouldn't have any problem with pump fuel, even if your SCR ends up a couple of tenths above 11:1. I hope you have plans for a stout valvetrain. Those XFI lobes are hell on springs! With the ported 210's, I assume you'll be revving above 6500, in which case I'd advise about 160 lbs on the seat.
If it were mine, I'd be calling Lloyd Elliott and getting a custom cam in lieu of the XFI. Proabably about the same cost. and he'll guide you better than I can regarding valvetrain requirements. www.elliottsportworks.com
Yes, I've read alot about the XFI lobes also. The AFR210's I got online came with custom PAC Racing valve springs which have 220lbs on the seat. The were meant for a solid roller cam. Some here say that pushes the upper tolerance limit on the LS7 lifters, which I am using. Someone recommended, in a different thread, Morel lifters for that seat pressure, but I had already purchased new LS7 lifters and Morel lifters are very expensive.
So I chose a new valve spring instead, a PAC Racing spring, Part #1934. 160lb on the seat. It's a dual spring design with damper. OD and ID spring measurements are the same measurements as the 220lb springs that came with the AFR heads. Only the install height is .070" less. So today I should receive .060" shims to place under the spring locators and next week me and my machinist are gonna check these AFR heads out and install the new springs.
Last edited by UltRoadWarrior9; 08-24-2016 at 10:45 AM.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
I do believe you have it covered
Wise to back away from that 220 lb seat load on HR lifters!
Wise to back away from that 220 lb seat load on HR lifters!
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
I don't see an issue with the Cometics on iron block / al heads. I've seen lots of successful builds with them.
With a big cam like the 292, you shouldn't have any problem with pump fuel, even if your SCR ends up a couple of tenths above 11:1. I hope you have plans for a stout valvetrain. Those XFI lobes are hell on springs! With the ported 210's, I assume you'll be revving above 6500, in which case I'd advise about 160 lbs on the seat.
If it were mine, I'd be calling Lloyd Elliott and getting a custom cam in lieu of the XFI. Proabably about the same cost. and he'll guide you better than I can regarding valvetrain requirements. www.elliottsportworks.com
With a big cam like the 292, you shouldn't have any problem with pump fuel, even if your SCR ends up a couple of tenths above 11:1. I hope you have plans for a stout valvetrain. Those XFI lobes are hell on springs! With the ported 210's, I assume you'll be revving above 6500, in which case I'd advise about 160 lbs on the seat.
If it were mine, I'd be calling Lloyd Elliott and getting a custom cam in lieu of the XFI. Proabably about the same cost. and he'll guide you better than I can regarding valvetrain requirements. www.elliottsportworks.com
I've made a setup that makes it easy to switch out a cam, without removing the oil pan and front timing cover.
Last edited by UltRoadWarrior9; 08-24-2016 at 02:21 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
Ult, I'll be running .105" wall 5/16" pushrods on my upcoming LT1 SR build, just so I can use my existing valvetrain setup minus the cam. Lloyd advised those, based on ~190 lbs on the seat with the tight lash SR setup.
Not a hard requirement for 160 lb seat, but as Orr said, more valvetrain stability is always a good thing.
Not a hard requirement for 160 lb seat, but as Orr said, more valvetrain stability is always a good thing.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 383 SBC Gen1 Build. Quench, Deck clearance, Head gasket Selection
Manley seems to have all the bases covered when it comes to pushrods. I'm liking their 5/16 .120" thick pushrods.
Also like Scorpion roller rockers. They make a set for the left AFR head and the right AFR head? I understand the offset of .1", but what differentiates the left and right heads?
A pushrod length checker and 1 of each of those L &R roller rockers is in my budget @$70 from Summit.
EDIT: I have a set of used ls7 lifters so I can disassemble 1 at work and convert it to solid roller, for pushrod measuring purposes only.
Also like Scorpion roller rockers. They make a set for the left AFR head and the right AFR head? I understand the offset of .1", but what differentiates the left and right heads?
A pushrod length checker and 1 of each of those L &R roller rockers is in my budget @$70 from Summit.
EDIT: I have a set of used ls7 lifters so I can disassemble 1 at work and convert it to solid roller, for pushrod measuring purposes only.
Last edited by UltRoadWarrior9; 09-08-2016 at 03:13 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post