5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
#201
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Batesville, AR
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Formula Firebird
Engine: 350 (5.7) TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 POSI
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Hah, I have a couple 5.0 motors lying around...
Here's a cool article though... http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...dup/index.html
Not to worried though, leaving my 305 bone stock expect for headers and exhaust, as well as cold-air intake. Basic stuff and all money on body and suspension. It's fast enough for me and when it's time for a rebuild a 350 fits in perfect.
Here's a cool article though... http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...dup/index.html
Not to worried though, leaving my 305 bone stock expect for headers and exhaust, as well as cold-air intake. Basic stuff and all money on body and suspension. It's fast enough for me and when it's time for a rebuild a 350 fits in perfect.
#202
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Hah, I have a couple 5.0 motors lying around...
Here's a cool article though... http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...dup/index.html
Not to worried though, leaving my 305 bone stock expect for headers and exhaust, as well as cold-air intake. Basic stuff and all money on body and suspension. It's fast enough for me and when it's time for a rebuild a 350 fits in perfect.
Here's a cool article though... http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...dup/index.html
Not to worried though, leaving my 305 bone stock expect for headers and exhaust, as well as cold-air intake. Basic stuff and all money on body and suspension. It's fast enough for me and when it's time for a rebuild a 350 fits in perfect.
I also noticed that a mustang owner commented below the article saying what BS it was and how his built 351 made only 330 RWHP LOL. Guess the ford guys were a little upset with the results too haha.
#203
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Ohio
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 3.42 posi
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Well I know from experience that my old engine setup in my TA made 230 RWHP with a 5 speed and 3.23's and I ran a 14.0 at between 96-98 mph. That was with a pretty crummy launch too and a 95 mustang cobra is right around the same power and weight as my car.
I also would not call your setup just bolt ons because of the superram intake. Taking off the TPI makes a world difference on an L98, and after seeing your mods it seems you would beat a stock cobra rather easily. I still don't think it would be very close if it was just an air intake, header, exhaust (etc) L98. Maybe off a dig but they just choke out so bad up top with the stock TPI that I think the cobra would pull ahead.
I also would not call your setup just bolt ons because of the superram intake. Taking off the TPI makes a world difference on an L98, and after seeing your mods it seems you would beat a stock cobra rather easily. I still don't think it would be very close if it was just an air intake, header, exhaust (etc) L98. Maybe off a dig but they just choke out so bad up top with the stock TPI that I think the cobra would pull ahead.
Mine made 235 WHP and 318 WTQ through an auto and 3.23's with just the superram, injectors, TB, muffler, ignition, and tune. Everything else was still stock and it was running too rich on the runs, in the mid to low 11's A/F. I suspect I'm in the 250-260 WHP range now at least which is well over 300 hp and probably knocking on the door of 400 tq. at the motor.
I only managed a 14.2 at 96 back when I dyno'd at 235, but my launches were crap.
Most of the stock cobras dyno'd mainly in the 210-220 range with 230 being the very best of them, so chances are considering how much less torque they have and a few less HP than you were making on a 14 flat run, mid 14's are correct for them most commonly.
#204
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
It just bolts on and doesn't require any special mods really, so why would it not be a bolt on lol?
Mine made 235 WHP and 318 WTQ through an auto and 3.23's with just the superram, injectors, TB, muffler, ignition, and tune. Everything else was still stock and it was running too rich on the runs, in the mid to low 11's A/F. I suspect I'm in the 250-260 WHP range now at least which is well over 300 hp and probably knocking on the door of 400 tq. at the motor.
I only managed a 14.2 at 96 back when I dyno'd at 235, but my launches were crap.
Most of the stock cobras dyno'd mainly in the 210-220 range with 230 being the very best of them, so chances are considering how much less torque they have and a few less HP than you were making on a 14 flat run, mid 14's are correct for them most commonly.
Mine made 235 WHP and 318 WTQ through an auto and 3.23's with just the superram, injectors, TB, muffler, ignition, and tune. Everything else was still stock and it was running too rich on the runs, in the mid to low 11's A/F. I suspect I'm in the 250-260 WHP range now at least which is well over 300 hp and probably knocking on the door of 400 tq. at the motor.
I only managed a 14.2 at 96 back when I dyno'd at 235, but my launches were crap.
Most of the stock cobras dyno'd mainly in the 210-220 range with 230 being the very best of them, so chances are considering how much less torque they have and a few less HP than you were making on a 14 flat run, mid 14's are correct for them most commonly.
And even though the intake manifold "bolts on," cylinder heads bolt on too and those are def not classified as a bolt on, lol. I personally consider bolt ons to be any part added to the exterior of the motor without changing the motors stock appearance or setup.... Headers, exhaust, throttle body, air intake, etc.
#205
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Ohio
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 3.42 posi
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Your stock cam has got to be holding you back big time! That thing would probably make 300+ RWHP with a better cam. Ever get back to the track with the rich issue fixed?
And even though the intake manifold "bolts on," cylinder heads bolt on too and those are def not classified as a bolt on, lol. I personally consider bolt ons to be any part added to the exterior of the motor without changing the motors stock appearance or setup.... Headers, exhaust, throttle body, air intake, etc.
And even though the intake manifold "bolts on," cylinder heads bolt on too and those are def not classified as a bolt on, lol. I personally consider bolt ons to be any part added to the exterior of the motor without changing the motors stock appearance or setup.... Headers, exhaust, throttle body, air intake, etc.
I have a brand new ZZ4 cam sitting here I'll be throwing in with ported/polished ZZ4 heads and 1.6 rollers in the near future and a airbox to feed it all with ram air. Also going to 3.42 gears and a 2400 stall.
#206
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
So I own the Iroc-z and my brother owns that 5.0. We are one year apart so we are always racing and without a doubt my car always pulls off on him. He has AFR heads, Cam and lifters, all that junk and i am just running a 90 + HP hypertech chip. nothing else.
#207
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
LOL...is your brother starting in 5th gear when he races you?
#208
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
Car: 88 Formula 350
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 9" 3.89
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
I doubt it... There is no way his AFR headed 5.0 gets beat by your stock Iroc. I own both... Granted my Formula isn't close to being stock... My best friend has an 89 GT 5.0 5 Speed, and I have a 90 5.0 Auto...
My 5.0 auto feels faster than my other buddies 87 Trans Am 5.0 5 speed.
I was in my buddies 5.0 when he beat an 87-90 Iroc and an 87-89 RS... I don't know if the Iroc was a 5.7 or 5.0, but my buddy beat them pretty bad.
On the other hand, my Formula destroyed my buddies bolt on 5.0 and his stock 89 5.0 GT 5 speed, along with all the other 5.0's I have ran into where I live.
My 5.0 auto feels faster than my other buddies 87 Trans Am 5.0 5 speed.
I was in my buddies 5.0 when he beat an 87-90 Iroc and an 87-89 RS... I don't know if the Iroc was a 5.7 or 5.0, but my buddy beat them pretty bad.
On the other hand, my Formula destroyed my buddies bolt on 5.0 and his stock 89 5.0 GT 5 speed, along with all the other 5.0's I have ran into where I live.
#209
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: Camaro RS
Engine: obd2 350 lt1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Ive lost to a h/c/i 5.0 forged pistons crank from a dig and a roll. Im lt1 so i doubt a 305 5spd would even keep up with one.
#210
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
Car: 88 Formula 350
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 9" 3.89
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Oh, I didn't see that he was running a 90+ HP hypertech chip... no wonder he won...
#211
Supreme Member
#213
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: Camaro RS
Engine: obd2 350 lt1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
So you beat him off the line and then he passes you, Thats expected. But im guessing a geo metro would beat your brother off the line if he has no traction.
#214
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 z28 g92 car
Engine: l98 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt posi 3.23 gears
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
heres something you gotta think about too id rather be running a 305 or 350 simply because they' re both more reliable at the track im not saying a 302 isnt realiable but after running at high rpms all day i would feelconfident in my 350.
#217
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
I have a 5.0 HO in my 88 TBird, with a 5 speed. It's a Mustang drivetrain with a few minor bolt ons. I can tell you that car feels faster then other stock Thirdgens I have driven, aside from my TTA. I haven't driven any 350 powered Thirdgens though. It is a heck of alot cheaper to make power with it too. Simple bolt ons net some nice gains. I had a beautiful red Iroc Z convertible pull up on me and wanted to race, and he was plenty surprised that he got beat by a piece of junk. I know it's no comparison as the convertibles came with the lower horsepower 305, but it was still memorable.
My beater:
My beater:
Last edited by 82tarecaro; 11-14-2011 at 02:59 PM.
#219
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
I think I have owned enough cars to know when something can get out of its own way LOL! It's definitely alot of fun to drive.
Last edited by 82tarecaro; 11-14-2011 at 03:12 PM.
#220
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
Car: 88 Formula 350
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 9" 3.89
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Any head work done to your Thunderbird? Because if not, I foresee it being a 14 second car. In which case, I don't think is too fast.
But in the comparison with thirdgens, you would have to run into a 350 car to have a close race. So I can see it being fast in that manner.
But in the comparison with thirdgens, you would have to run into a 350 car to have a close race. So I can see it being fast in that manner.
#221
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Yeah - it's not an LS killer, but I would think I could give a stock 350 Thirdgen a run for it's money. It's my daily driver beater. I use it to get to work around the mean streets of NYC. I am constantly changing front end parts because of the terrible roads over here. The rims are bent, and the car is a dented mess. But the 5.0 is one of the most reliable motors I have ever owned. It's probably a 14 second car like you said. But I am only comparing it to most stock thirdgens. It's definitely faster. But you are right. A set of heads would really wake it up. If it makes it ten more years till I retire, I am going to build it the way it deserves to be built. I figure it earned that.
#222
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
A 5.0 will respond no better to mods than a 350 TPI...it's just that the ford 5.0's have way more interest and much more of an aftermarket than a TPI motor does so any ford guy can open a magazine and do a bunch of bolt ons and notice a gain. We can't even buy an aftermarket cold air intake so a lot of the mods we do are owners that know thier stuff and can fabricate. Bolt a holley stealth ram to an otherwise stock 350 TPI and you have a mustang 5.0 killer. Both great motors, but TPI engines are very looked down upon for no reason. They can make decent power if you know what your doing.
#223
Former Sponsor
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
He quietly enters the room
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2STgZ6fYTM&feature=fvsr
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2STgZ6fYTM&feature=fvsr
#225
Supreme Member
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Tony thats kinda funny!
Couple of guys having a discussion on 5.0s in a driveway. Tony rumbles up, gets out of his car "Hi Im Tony here is my cah, its faster than *****, I watch Speedvision, Nascar, and Madhouse. I also Sculpt. Anyway, just wanted to say hi. I'm goinng to put my hood down, lock it up and get back in my car and tear off down the road. Nice talking to you guys".
HAHAHA!
Couple of guys having a discussion on 5.0s in a driveway. Tony rumbles up, gets out of his car "Hi Im Tony here is my cah, its faster than *****, I watch Speedvision, Nascar, and Madhouse. I also Sculpt. Anyway, just wanted to say hi. I'm goinng to put my hood down, lock it up and get back in my car and tear off down the road. Nice talking to you guys".
HAHAHA!
#227
Former Sponsor
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Tony thats kinda funny!
Couple of guys having a discussion on 5.0s in a driveway. Tony rumbles up, gets out of his car "Hi Im Tony here is my cah, its faster than *****, I watch Speedvision, Nascar, and Madhouse. I also Sculpt. Anyway, just wanted to say hi. I'm goinng to put my hood down, lock it up and get back in my car and tear off down the road. Nice talking to you guys".
HAHAHA!
Couple of guys having a discussion on 5.0s in a driveway. Tony rumbles up, gets out of his car "Hi Im Tony here is my cah, its faster than *****, I watch Speedvision, Nascar, and Madhouse. I also Sculpt. Anyway, just wanted to say hi. I'm goinng to put my hood down, lock it up and get back in my car and tear off down the road. Nice talking to you guys".
HAHAHA!
LOLDan sits next to me in the office over here. I told him I couldn't resist.
I could have did a better burnout but if you look to the right my neighbor works on the town board and they just repaved my street.
Sorry for the poor acting skills
#228
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: shalimar florida
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 pontiac firebird
Engine: 305 v8 lo3 201.5hp and 268.2 tq
Transmission: 4speed 700r4 corvette servo
Axle/Gears: 3.42 disk posi 4th gen rear swap
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
i have read all of this and right now i have a 1992 firebird tbi with 202 hp to tires and 268 tq to the tires dynoed on a mustang dyno been told that mustang dyno are a lil on the low side my hp was at 4417 rpm and tq was at 3673 rpm i can beat a stock gt mustang thats a auto have not raced one thats a 5speed with my rearswap i did. i went from 2.73 open to to a 4th gen 3.42 posi out of a 98 z28 camaro if u see wanna see my dyno number ill show u now heres the odd part about it my buddy has a 1991 firebird 5.7tpi he dynoed 193 hp at 4200 and his tq was 272 at 3300 its very weird my car is a 305 tbi had it checked
#230
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
i have read all of this and right now i have a 1992 firebird tbi with 202 hp to tires and 268 tq to the tires dynoed on a mustang dyno been told that mustang dyno are a lil on the low side my hp was at 4417 rpm and tq was at 3673 rpm i can beat a stock gt mustang thats a auto have not raced one thats a 5speed with my rearswap i did. i went from 2.73 open to to a 4th gen 3.42 posi out of a 98 z28 camaro if u see wanna see my dyno number ill show u now heres the odd part about it my buddy has a 1991 firebird 5.7tpi he dynoed 193 hp at 4200 and his tq was 272 at 3300 its very weird my car is a 305 tbi had it checked
#231
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: manitoba.
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2002 ws6, 2011 sierra 6.2L 6 speed
Engine: ls1
Transmission: M6
Axle/Gears: 3:42's
#234
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: shalimar florida
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 pontiac firebird
Engine: 305 v8 lo3 201.5hp and 268.2 tq
Transmission: 4speed 700r4 corvette servo
Axle/Gears: 3.42 disk posi 4th gen rear swap
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
were here si the dyno sheet to prove it http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?s...type=3&theater
#235
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
The link doesn't work.....and no one is doubting your dyno sheet...there's just no way it's a stock LO3...it's mechanically impossible.
#236
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: shalimar florida
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 pontiac firebird
Engine: 305 v8 lo3 201.5hp and 268.2 tq
Transmission: 4speed 700r4 corvette servo
Axle/Gears: 3.42 disk posi 4th gen rear swap
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
well i have not in to the motor at all weather someone else did before i got the car who knows all i have done to it is 3 inch flowmaster muffler system a chip from tbi chip stage 1 msd cap rotor coil 4 inch open element air cleaner with top lid a 4th gen rearend swap to 3.43 posi disk. Also a crank underdrive pulley ac delco plugs i have not even touched the timing what should a 305 tbi timing be at advance at what?
#237
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: shalimar florida
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 pontiac firebird
Engine: 305 v8 lo3 201.5hp and 268.2 tq
Transmission: 4speed 700r4 corvette servo
Axle/Gears: 3.42 disk posi 4th gen rear swap
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.p...00000358483616 try this and go look at my pics
#238
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
well i have not in to the motor at all weather someone else did before i got the car who knows all i have done to it is 3 inch flowmaster muffler system a chip from tbi chip stage 1 msd cap rotor coil 4 inch open element air cleaner with top lid a 4th gen rearend swap to 3.43 posi disk. Also a crank underdrive pulley ac delco plugs i have not even touched the timing what should a 305 tbi timing be at advance at what?
#239
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: shalimar florida
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 pontiac firebird
Engine: 305 v8 lo3 201.5hp and 268.2 tq
Transmission: 4speed 700r4 corvette servo
Axle/Gears: 3.42 disk posi 4th gen rear swap
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
ya your prolly right the back of the mtor does show 5.0 on it i got a lt1 cam i wanna put in it to soon if i can get 300hp out of the crank i would be fine with that and 330 crank tq i would be fine with that to just give me enough hp to kill gt mustang thats are a lil big modded not cams spuerchargers and stuff like that
#240
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
Car: 88 Formula 350
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 9" 3.89
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Lets keep this on topic. Make your own thread about how bad *** your 305 TBI car is.
Anyone have any Stock for Stock races against mustangs? I personally have never lost to a mustang yet.
Anyone have any Stock for Stock races against mustangs? I personally have never lost to a mustang yet.
#241
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
No really stock...but I wooped up on a bolt on new edge GT with my old motor. It was a cammed/bolt on 305 TPI with a 5 speed. Made 235 RWHP. This guy pulled up next to me while cruising and was pacing me. When he saw me look over, I heard the downshift, so I followed suite and he jumped on me. Reeled him back in and then put about a car length on him before we shut down. Dude wouldn't even get back beside me after that lol. It was the first new edge I had ever raced with my cammed combo and I was a pretty happy camper!
#243
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sanctuary state
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes
on
24 Posts
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Stat wises supposedlythe IROCS 350 anyway edged out the 5.0s back in the 80s. I owned a few GTs back in the late 80s. Laid waste to many an IROC, Vettes were tougher as they usually had a better gear and lighter. Fun nonetheless but looking back they were all pigs.
Drove a mint 86 5.0 I was going to buy months ago and couldnt believe how slow it felt even with 3.73 gears. When youre young about anything feels fast. lol Now a 12 sec car feels slow.
If I could get off the line ok it was done but very very close. Most times the TPI cars could get the jump...their win.
Didnt matter most back then were just happy to see a production car with over 200hp and going up almost every yr. HP died in 70/71 so a 14 sec car was something to get excited about.
I did drive one IROC I was impressed with, an almost new 89 that was a Hawaii car, 5 spd with the 350. That car would spin in 2nd no matter what you did.
Strong runner!
Drove a mint 86 5.0 I was going to buy months ago and couldnt believe how slow it felt even with 3.73 gears. When youre young about anything feels fast. lol Now a 12 sec car feels slow.
If I could get off the line ok it was done but very very close. Most times the TPI cars could get the jump...their win.
Didnt matter most back then were just happy to see a production car with over 200hp and going up almost every yr. HP died in 70/71 so a 14 sec car was something to get excited about.
I did drive one IROC I was impressed with, an almost new 89 that was a Hawaii car, 5 spd with the 350. That car would spin in 2nd no matter what you did.
Strong runner!
#244
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Highland Indiana
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Trans Am Ram Air
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Not to call you out or anything, but 350 Camaros didn't come with 5 speeds.
#245
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sanctuary state
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes
on
24 Posts
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Youre right they didnt.
I did look at one that was a Hawaii car to buy that did have the 350/5spd combo, non 49 state car. It would waste the tires clear into 3rd gear. Beautiful car.
Unfortunately it was an insurance job and drove funny. Nicest IROC Ive seen to this day.
I did look at one that was a Hawaii car to buy that did have the 350/5spd combo, non 49 state car. It would waste the tires clear into 3rd gear. Beautiful car.
Unfortunately it was an insurance job and drove funny. Nicest IROC Ive seen to this day.
#246
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
Youre right they didnt.
I did look at one that was a Hawaii car to buy that did have the 350/5spd combo, non 49 state car. It would waste the tires clear into 3rd gear. Beautiful car.
Unfortunately it was an insurance job and drove funny. Nicest IROC Ive seen to this day.
I did look at one that was a Hawaii car to buy that did have the 350/5spd combo, non 49 state car. It would waste the tires clear into 3rd gear. Beautiful car.
Unfortunately it was an insurance job and drove funny. Nicest IROC Ive seen to this day.
#248
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sanctuary state
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes
on
24 Posts
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: 5.0 mustang vs 350 camaro
I didnt look at the RPOs in those days didnt even know what one was.
It was definitely the 350 that was easy enough to verify. Car was only 2 yrs old at the time.
It was definitely the 350 that was easy enough to verify. Car was only 2 yrs old at the time.