Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
#1
Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
Out of curiosity, from those who know, how well would this cam worth with TPI? Could it be tuned to run well? I have the possibility to get a TPI set up for cheap and it would be my foray into swapping from CCQjet to EFI...I know the RPM range is a bit high but that's ok, it's what is currently in the car. Engine is a 355. Looking for any and all advice. Thanks!
Summit Racing Part Number:LUN-20080721
UPC: 090127693551
Cam Style: Hydraulic roller tappet
Basic Operating RPM Range: 1,800-5,800
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift: 219
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift: 227
Duration at 050 inch Lift: 219 int./227 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration: 270
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 278
Advertised Duration: 270 int./278 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.515 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.530 in.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.515 int./0.530 exh.
Lobe Separation (degrees): 112
Computer-Controlled Compatible: Yes
Grind Number: VDSC-270
Valve Springs Required: Yes
Summit Racing Part Number:LUN-20080721
UPC: 090127693551
Cam Style: Hydraulic roller tappet
Basic Operating RPM Range: 1,800-5,800
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift: 219
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift: 227
Duration at 050 inch Lift: 219 int./227 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration: 270
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 278
Advertised Duration: 270 int./278 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.515 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.530 in.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.515 int./0.530 exh.
Lobe Separation (degrees): 112
Computer-Controlled Compatible: Yes
Grind Number: VDSC-270
Valve Springs Required: Yes
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
I looked into this cam quite a bit. Finally went with a similar custom grind Lunati. It's gonna have very similar characteristics to the GM hotcam, but with better lobe profiles. Probably a tad higher RPM range than the TPI likes, but yes, you can tune for it, and yes it'll run well, especially if you get a higher flowing TPI. What heads are on that 355? Ultimately like all things, a system that works well is better than a hodge podge of parts. What are your ultimate goals for the car?
#3
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
I looked into this cam quite a bit. Finally went with a similar custom grind Lunati. It's gonna have very similar characteristics to the GM hotcam, but with better lobe profiles. Probably a tad higher RPM range than the TPI likes, but yes, you can tune for it, and yes it'll run well, especially if you get a higher flowing TPI. What heads are on that 355? Ultimately like all things, a system that works well is better than a hodge podge of parts. What are your ultimate goals for the car?
Car is going be a great DD in the summer and occasional backup car when my other DD (winter bad weather) goes down. Motor currently puts 269hp to the wheels but is being gone through because I lost oil pressure and found bearing material in the oil.
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
A miniram would sure take advantage of that cam. Again, not saying you'd be disappointed with the TPI from a butt-dyno point of view, but the MR is certainly better. The GM Hotcam was originally designed for the LT manifold, which of course.....well.....miniram.
#5
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
These are still future plans as it's still carbed at the moment and I'm actually really happy with how it runs. I just can't really resist tinkering...
Maybe I'll save the miniram for the 67....or will I LS it? ugh...so many ways to go.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
In other words, the cam is too "big" for TPI, too "small" for LT1/miniram.
That said I'd use it on TPI since you already have it but I'd swap if/when going LT/Mini
#7
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
The hotcam for the LT1 is considered very mild.
In other words, the cam is too "big" for TPI, too "small" for LT1/miniram.
That said I'd use it on TPI since you already have it but I'd swap if/when going LT/Mini
In other words, the cam is too "big" for TPI, too "small" for LT1/miniram.
That said I'd use it on TPI since you already have it but I'd swap if/when going LT/Mini
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
Right. And by then swapping cams you'd gain even more power and even more RPM. The hotcam is about the most dated and mildest cam in the LT1 world.
It's underwhelming. It was made to help boost an lt1 to lt4 power levels. Which weren't that much higher in stock form.
It's underwhelming. It was made to help boost an lt1 to lt4 power levels. Which weren't that much higher in stock form.
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
Hot cam is a fun cam. I just tuned a 383 lt1 with stock heads and intake, hotcam. 4.11 gear 9" and auto it made 280's whp and 312 trq. Very peppy car and fun to drive. Had some crappy headers and small exhaust. Stock converter.
Sounded stock to me, well mannered. It used most of the stock tune to drive it, didnt need much correction til wot
In a 350, it be a nice cam with mild lope. Lunati has more aggressive lobes and less overlap off the seat. Should idle smoother and be even more responsive. It will work fine with tpi but as stated it will run better with intake mods. All stock L98's run faster with intake mods lol
Sounded stock to me, well mannered. It used most of the stock tune to drive it, didnt need much correction til wot
In a 350, it be a nice cam with mild lope. Lunati has more aggressive lobes and less overlap off the seat. Should idle smoother and be even more responsive. It will work fine with tpi but as stated it will run better with intake mods. All stock L98's run faster with intake mods lol
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
Hot cam is a fun cam. I just tuned a 383 lt1 with stock heads and intake, hotcam. 4.11 gear 9" and auto it made 280's whp and 312 trq. Very peppy car and fun to drive. Had some crappy headers and small exhaust. Stock converter.
Sounded stock to me, well mannered. It used most of the stock tune to drive it, didnt need much correction til wot
In a 350, it be a nice cam with mild lope. Lunati has more aggressive lobes and less overlap off the seat. Should idle smoother and be even more responsive. It will work fine with tpi but as stated it will run better with intake mods. All stock L98's run faster with intake mods lol
Sounded stock to me, well mannered. It used most of the stock tune to drive it, didnt need much correction til wot
In a 350, it be a nice cam with mild lope. Lunati has more aggressive lobes and less overlap off the seat. Should idle smoother and be even more responsive. It will work fine with tpi but as stated it will run better with intake mods. All stock L98's run faster with intake mods lol
The hotcam is a "neat" cam but for a 350 NON TPI engine it's a bit of a joke.
I will point out that a hotcam is capable of 32xwhp on a stock headed 350lt1. The cam I had was capable of 350whp with equal mods.
Last edited by Vanilla Ice; 02-04-2016 at 11:16 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
...and still a stock 350
Hotcam is a poor choice. It's like upgrading from peanut to just stock lt1 cam. What is the point? Save a couple hundred dollars and get a cam that will provide triple the gains.
#13
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
Hotcam is a poor choice.
As I said earlier, good for what you have, -and good for MAX power possible are two completely different conversations. .....and all I'm trying to say is that given the combo that he already has, using a TPI for now, and switching to a MR later sounds like a good plan. Not saying best ever, not saying best power, not saying he's gonna be an internet hero....just saying it's a good plan.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
All I was saying is that both cams are not optimal on either setups mentioned, Future or far future. No big deal. It'll still be fun.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
Lol have to define optimal. For sub 6500 rpm power, strong in the 3000-6000 rpm range, thats the duration you need in a 350 motor, even with good heads. Shorter runner intake ofcourse
More cam would be optimal for over 6500 rpm power.
Tpi is a 5000 rpm and less setup for the most part. Big tube runners or siamesed runners can extend to 5500-6000. Custom tubes of great diameter and welded up large port bases can go higher still
More cam would be optimal for over 6500 rpm power.
Tpi is a 5000 rpm and less setup for the most part. Big tube runners or siamesed runners can extend to 5500-6000. Custom tubes of great diameter and welded up large port bases can go higher still
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
There's only one time the hotcam or similar are ever considered optimal and that's if you go off budget alone. There are better grinds that give better power everywhere and anywhere you like. I could point out a cam that will best it no matter what setup you throw out.
They are "It'll-do" cams.
"That's all I have to say about that."
They are "It'll-do" cams.
"That's all I have to say about that."
#19
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
it's not a choice...he already has it. .....but if we ARE putting cam selection back on table, (which the OP never mentioned)...then maybe the heads could be upgraded too. ...or why not a 383?...or even an LS?
As I said earlier, good for what you have, -and good for MAX power possible are two completely different conversations. .....and all I'm trying to say is that given the combo that he already has, using a TPI for now, and switching to a MR later sounds like a good plan. Not saying best ever, not saying best power, not saying he's gonna be an internet hero....just saying it's a good plan.
As I said earlier, good for what you have, -and good for MAX power possible are two completely different conversations. .....and all I'm trying to say is that given the combo that he already has, using a TPI for now, and switching to a MR later sounds like a good plan. Not saying best ever, not saying best power, not saying he's gonna be an internet hero....just saying it's a good plan.
Heads for now are off the table. I have enough to do the motor to get it running and nothing else at this point.
I simply have a line on a TPI set up for "cheap", and while I"m happy with the carb set up, I can't help but want to tinker...for better or worse...and since I have the cam, I was curious as to the thoughts about the Vodoo cam I already have because yes, Budget is HUGE right now...if I don't fix the car, I ship it back to me broke and buy a new couch and love seat with the left over for our house...
Hell, the TPI might end up on my 67....lol..who knows!
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lexington NC
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROCZ
Engine: 350 TPI with a fast EZ efi
Transmission: t-5 conversion
Axle/Gears: 3;42
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
I'm using a roller cam from a fast burn 385 motor. the engine is a l-31, aluminum heads and a stock TPI. Got rid of the stock ECM using a fast EZ efi, world class t5 and the stock 3:42 gears and a tru trac dif. Car is a blast to drive..............
#21
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Freehold NJ
Posts: 297
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Iroc 5.7,67 SS Camaro,90 Formula
Engine: 355 AFR Superram LPE 219
Transmission: 700r4 3000 stall 4spd 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Decent Cam for TPI? Any help appreciated
Fast burn 385 motor is zz-4 cam correct?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
85@IRocZ
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
6
02-01-2016 08:09 AM