Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Trap speed Vs Rpm Vs MPH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2015, 03:02 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fasteddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,273
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Trap speed Vs Rpm Vs MPH

I have a 700r4 with a few mods done to it. I bracket race it quite a bit. 3.73 rear end gears on 28x10 slicks.

What I noticed on a data log was that my RPM Vs the Tire diameter Vs the MPH was a lot higher then i thought i would be (the ratio between the group)

OR is this normal from the tq converter slipping??

Trap was 116Mph@6300rpm

Does anyone have a good lead on a calculator that will tell me a rough estimate on what rpm i should be turning vs mph and tire diameter in 3rd gear on a 700r?

Thanks for any input. I also attached that datalog that can be looked at on excel.
Attached Files
File Type: zip
11.70 at 115mph (2).zip (2.4 KB, 5 views)

Last edited by fasteddi; 01-15-2015 at 03:10 PM.
Old 01-16-2015, 12:54 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
Night rider327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bowdon, GA.
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Trap speed Vs Rpm Vs MPH

5192 rpm w/o converter slip factored in

3rd gear is 1.00

I come up with your converter slip at 14.88% Could be more or less as I don't know your tire's true roll out, nor does it count for tire growth at the big end of track.

Is your trans/converter lock up or non lock up?

For stock and cheaper made off the shelf non lockup converters 8-12% slip is common avg. For custom made race converters 5-7% slip is the norm.

I have seen some aftermarket converters with 15-17% slip and that's just way too much
Old 01-16-2015, 03:56 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fasteddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,273
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: Trap speed Vs Rpm Vs MPH

Originally Posted by Night rider327
5192 rpm w/o converter slip factored in

3rd gear is 1.00

I come up with your converter slip at 14.88% Could be more or less as I don't know your tire's true roll out, nor does it count for tire growth at the big end of track.

Is your trans/converter lock up or non lock up?

For stock and cheaper made off the shelf non lockup converters 8-12% slip is common avg. For custom made race converters 5-7% slip is the norm.

I have seen some aftermarket converters with 15-17% slip and that's just way too much
Yea it's a lockup converter.

I think it's just time to look into a better converter. Too bad it's gotta be a custom one. I one makes them for the narrow 700r4 that's in my v6.
Old 01-17-2015, 09:02 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member
 
cosmick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Salt Lake
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '86 Camaro, '94 Camaro, 3 others
Engine: LG4 ->L29, L32->LR4, L36, LG4, L31
Transmission: 700R-4, T5WC, 4L80E, SM465, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23, WTB/WTT 2.93
Re: Trap speed Vs Rpm Vs MPH

I've had a converter that slipped that much, but there's more to this than calculating at 116 MPH. See, the dragstrip gives your speed between the 1/4-mile mark, and a point before you finish the distance. Your actual MPH right on the final stripe is more like 119. Then what's the actual measured rollout of those 28" tires? Measure that, then divide that by 3.1416 before trying to calculate what your RPM should be.
There's no reason you can't get the same stall speed with less than half that much slippage from a good converter. A thousand RPM of slippage is a very poor converter indeed.
GM lockup converters aren't made to survive lockup at WOT, even at 200 HP in a 3000# car. You have to waste a grand on a specialty converter if you want WOT lockup.
Old 01-18-2015, 08:33 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fasteddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,273
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: Trap speed Vs Rpm Vs MPH

The 116mph and 6300 rpm was from a datalog on tunerpro at the track.

I will have to find the roll out on the 28 inch tires.

I talked to freakshow about a converter. May go that route. The stall I have is basically a high stalled stock convertee which I know is a poor converter.

Anyone have opinions about freakshow converters?

It doesn't have to be a lockup converter. But what are the cons of a non lock up converter for a car I drive on the street a bit?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bjpotter
History / Originality
47
01-22-2019 12:27 PM
forstral
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
08-19-2015 03:20 PM
jbd1969
Tech / General Engine
1
08-17-2015 07:06 PM
dhonda200
Transmissions and Drivetrain
6
08-11-2015 11:50 PM



Quick Reply: Trap speed Vs Rpm Vs MPH



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 PM.