Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

2.73s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2015, 09:49 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
83 WS6 T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
2.73s?

I recently bought a 1986 Trans Am with a cammed 305, Edelbrock performer intake and a 600 cfm Edelbrock performer carb. The motor itself is built for high acceleration because the guy was building it for a drag car. But it has 2.73s in the rear end. Should I swap these out or will 2.73s give me a much higher top speed? It still gets up and goes even with the airplane gears in it. If you're lucky you can even get it to spin but I'm torn between wheather I should keep them or swap them. Suggestions would be appreciated.
Old 01-21-2015, 11:08 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member
 
big gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2.73s?

How fast do you want to go? If you have enough room then the 2.73 will allow you to go faster, but it will take longer to get up to speed. A 3.42 is usually just about perfect for most of these cars with an overdrive transmission.
Old 01-21-2015, 01:21 PM
  #3  
Member
 
Formula 305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Saratoga Area, New York
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305 TBI (LO3)
Transmission: WC T-5 out of an 88 T/A
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.42 & Torsen Posi
Re: 2.73s?

3.42s are a MAJOR improvement. The 2.73s are nice highway gears but seriously lacking in the get up & go department. It is important to note that in stock trim the 700R4 will lock out overdrive at WOT, leaving you with a "top gear" ratio of about 1:1 (I'm not 100% sure if 3rd in the 700 is 1:1, but I believe it is close.)

http://www.f-body.org/gears/

I used this calculator for my data, assuming stock tire size of 245/50R16 and a redline of 5,000 RPM.

Theoretical top speed (gear limited) with 2.73s in 3rd: 140MPH

Theoretical top speed (gear limited) with 3.42s in 3rd: 112MPH

I've heard there are ways of modding the 700R to shift into 4th at WOT, but I have no experience in this department.
Old 01-21-2015, 01:33 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
 
big gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2.73s?

Yes, 3rd is 1:1
Old 01-22-2015, 01:15 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
Ron U.S.M.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: 2.73s?

2.73 to a 3.42 with a new L.S.D. and it will "NOT" be the same car.


Fun factor = 100% improvement.
Old 01-22-2015, 01:52 AM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
Phenom-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 Overdrive Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1 Positraction
Re: 2.73s?

3.23 posi I believe to be the best of both worlds.

You get great tire smoking throw your neck back acceleration and run good Rpms on the freeway @ 70mph and mpg stays around 16 city 23 hwy... When you baby it
Old 01-22-2015, 08:48 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
83 WS6 T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 2.73s?

I want to be able to hit about 130 and still accelerate pretty fast during low rpms. I took this car for a ride the other day and went up a steep hill, It stalled twice. I had to take it really easy and gradually press the throttle. I want gears that will let me light the tires up a hill. I have a 1983 junk Trans Am WS6 laying around with a posi rear in it. what gearing do you think would be in that? I know for sure it has more than 2.73 so I'll probably take it out, clean it up and swap it over.
Old 01-22-2015, 09:20 AM
  #8  
Member
 
Formula 305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Saratoga Area, New York
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305 TBI (LO3)
Transmission: WC T-5 out of an 88 T/A
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.42 & Torsen Posi
Re: 2.73s?

Originally Posted by 83 WS6 T/A
I want to be able to hit about 130 and still accelerate pretty fast during low rpms. I took this car for a ride the other day and went up a steep hill, It stalled twice. I had to take it really easy and gradually press the throttle. I want gears that will let me light the tires up a hill. I have a 1983 junk Trans Am WS6 laying around with a posi rear in it. what gearing do you think would be in that? I know for sure it has more than 2.73 so I'll probably take it out, clean it up and swap it over.
If it stalled twice trying to climb a steep hill you have a problem. I'd address that and re-evaluate your acceleration before you decide what to do with the rear.

Also, why on earth do you need to go 130 mph, is this a race car?
Old 01-22-2015, 09:21 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member
 
big gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2.73s?

Sounds like you have more problems than a gear. I'd be checking the ignition timing curve and get it worked out. You should be able to floor it with no hesitation or stall no matter what gear is in the rear end.
Old 01-22-2015, 07:39 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
Phenom-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 Overdrive Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1 Positraction
Re: 2.73s?

'82-'83 Trans Ams usually came with 3.23s.

But unless you have a manual transmission with bad clutch & gas footwork, there's no reason why you should be stalling uphill.
Old 01-28-2015, 08:57 AM
  #11  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
83 WS6 T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 2.73s?

It has a 600 cfm Edelbrock on it and that's too much for the engine. It needs a 500. That's the main reason it stalls but it also doesn't accelerate fast enough for me. It won't spin the tires to save it's life unless you're on gravel. I took the other rear end out of the 83 trans am and from what I saw it seems to have 3.08 gears in it.
Old 01-28-2015, 09:06 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
83 WS6 T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 2.73s?

Originally Posted by Formula 305
If it stalled twice trying to climb a steep hill you have a problem. I'd address that and re-evaluate your acceleration before you decide what to do with the rear.

Also, why on earth do you need to go 130 mph, is this a race car?
It needs carb work that's why it stalled, 600 cfm is too much for the 305. But once you get past the low rpms that the carb screws up on, it still doesnt accelerate nearly fast enough. Also, 130 is not that fast at all. That's the minimum speed I want this thing to go.
Old 01-28-2015, 09:13 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member

 
redneckjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Spring Hill, Fl.
Posts: 2,080
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Car: 87 iroc-z
Engine: 454
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 2.73s?

sounds like you need a tune-up. you might check for vacuum leaks too. a 600cfm carb is not too big for a 305.
Old 01-28-2015, 09:30 AM
  #14  
Supreme Member
 
big gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2.73s?

I agree, a 600 is not too big. The Edelbrock carb is set up so that it only allows as much air to pass through as the engine needs. You could put a 750 Edelbrock on it and it would still run fine if everything was set up correctly. I think you have a problem with your ignition timing. I would start by checking the timing advance with a light and see where it is at and work on getting it right.
Old 01-28-2015, 09:44 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: 2.73s?

Originally Posted by Ron U.S.M.C.
2.73 to a 3.42 with a new L.S.D. and it will "NOT" be the same car.


Fun factor = 100% improvement.



Also, gearing is all relative. I have 3.73's with my 5.7 and I can tell you, I ruined that theoretical top limit mentioned above. I was at 130 on the autobahn running about 4500rpm in OD. I was getting to the limit though where it was going to downshift to third and that would have possibly been ugly.

With a good kit in your trans, you can change how the trans reacts to overdrive at 75% throttle or more.
Old 01-28-2015, 09:46 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: 2.73s?

Originally Posted by 83 WS6 T/A
It needs carb work that's why it stalled, 600 cfm is too much for the 305. But once you get past the low rpms that the carb screws up on, it still doesnt accelerate nearly fast enough. Also, 130 is not that fast at all. That's the minimum speed I want this thing to go.

It needs a properly tuned Quadrajet is what it needs!!

Old 02-02-2015, 03:31 AM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
skyscrappin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2.73s?

Originally Posted by Ron U.S.M.C.
2.73 to a 3.42 with a new L.S.D. and it will "NOT" be the same car.


Fun factor = 100% improvement.
Hi what LDS
Old 02-02-2015, 03:33 AM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
skyscrappin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2.73s?

[QUOTE=skyscrappin1;5872893]Hi whats L.D.S. never heard of such...
Old 02-02-2015, 06:59 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member
 
big gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2.73s?

It's LSD, not lds. LSD is limited slip differential (posi).
Old 02-02-2015, 09:02 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: 2.73s?

[QUOTE=skyscrappin1;5872894]
Originally Posted by skyscrappin1
Hi whats L.D.S. never heard of such...
LOL.

LDS is "Latter Day Saints", as in the Mormons.

Big Gear Head has the answer.
Old 02-02-2015, 12:16 PM
  #21  
Member
 
2005Impalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Mose Lake
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 Z28 T-Top
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: I think 3.73 open dif
Re: 2.73s?

I believe I have 2.73s in the back of my car it feels like I am taking off in 2nd gear. I have had 3.23 rear gears in a stock 305 Camaro once and loved them. This time I want to go with 3.42s There was a big difference between the 2.73 and my 3.23 gears. I am running a 28" tire with the 2.73s though and my 3.23 had stock rears on it so that is another factor. I would check if there is a tag on the SW6 rear and see if it tells you want gears it came form the factory with. If you want top speed I would look at making it so you can grab 4th gear. Also you will not hit top calculated speed due to your stall converter slipping a little and not delivering full engine speed to the transmission so factor that in to your top speed when choosing a rear gear. A 3.23 might be your best choice with a modified throttle valve.
Old 02-02-2015, 01:00 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: 2.73s?

Your RPO codes I believe indicates what gearing it came with if you have them.
Old 03-03-2015, 08:31 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
83 WS6 T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 2.73s?

Hey guys, I apologize for my stupidity, I went to time the car and the guy who sold it to me didn't even have the distributor tightened down and it was way out of time, It's good now and will fishtail on dry roads when you put the throttle to the floor no problem without hesitation. I don't know why I didn't think to check that.
Old 03-03-2015, 01:43 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

 
RS Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pasadena, TX
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 2.73s?

It happens. Sometimes we get caught up in looking for big problems we forget the little or simple ones.
Old 03-03-2015, 08:22 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member
 
big gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2.73s?

I was pretty sure that you were going to find a problem with the timing (post 9 and 14). Glad you found it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
64Chief
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
09-12-2015 08:05 AM
john204481
Engine Swap
0
09-07-2015 03:22 PM
Warlocksirix
Suspension and Chassis
27
09-03-2015 12:26 PM
UltRoadWarrior9
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
09-02-2015 08:24 PM
Regal105
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
08-23-2015 03:45 PM



Quick Reply: 2.73s?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.