Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-29-2001, 09:27 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Oregon, WI US
Posts: 271

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Roller Rocker Question

I am going to put roller rockers on my 180 AFR heads and was wondering the diffrence between the self-alining(badspeller) and non other than the obivous. Also what would I need a stud gridle for? I am looking at the Harland Sharp 1.6, are these self or not? Do I need a stud gridle or not? Thanks For all the help!
STUB25 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2001, 11:05 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 784
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's

Classifieds Rating: (2)
I have AFR 195 heads on my engine, I am running Comp Cams 1.6's w/ no problem at all. You do not need self aligning rockers. Your heads should have screw-in studs and guide plates. Hope this helps.

------------------
1986 IROC, fully loaded, Mini Ram'd 383, Art Carr 700R4, Accel DFI, 12 bolt rear, etc, etc......
86 IROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2001, 12:21 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Oregon, WI US
Posts: 271

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks a lot and yes it helped, lol
STUB25 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2001, 12:25 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Oregon, WI US
Posts: 271

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Did you have to use tall valve covers or were you able to use the stock ones?
STUB25 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2001, 05:16 AM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 2,808
Car: 1982 Camaro
Engine: 377ci
Transmission: TH350/4200 Stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
on a vortec headed crate engine, can i run 1.6 rockers? just thought i'd ask. thanks, also, i dont quiet understand the ratio stuff, so if someone could explain what the difference between 1.5 and 1.6 and why it adds horsepower it would be appreciated. thanks
unknown_host is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2001, 10:40 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Panama City Beach,Florida
Posts: 1,301
Car: 1989 Camaro
Engine: 406
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I am not sure if you can run 1.6's on Vortec heads without having to elongate the pushrod holes to keep the pushrod from rubbing. By going from 1.5 to one 1.6 rocker arms you add about.032 lift to your cam. It opens the valve up a little bit furthure leting more air and fuel in and making more power.
Superman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2001, 12:45 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 592

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The ratio is the result of the difference between lift at the valve divided by lift at the camshaft lobe. All SBC camshaft's advertised lift is based on a 1.5:1 ratio - unless specifically noted otherwise(as in the LT4 camshaft which is designed for a 1.6:1 ratio).For instance a camshaft that has advertised lift of 0.450" at the valve has only 0.300" lift at the lobe. To determine how much additional lift you will gain by going to a higher ratio: divide the advertised lift by 1.5, and multiply the result by the higher ratio. For instance: if the advertised lift is 0.450" and you want to see how much lift you will get with 1.6:1 rocker arms -
0.450/1.5 = 0.300
0.300 x 1.6 = 0.480"

For stock cams under 0.450" lift, it is debatable whether the increased lift from higher ratio rockers will make enough hp to justify the cost. You may pick up some additional hp by using roller rocker arms, as they reduce some of the frictional losses in the valve train.
88IROCs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2001, 12:53 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 592

Classifieds Rating: (0)
on a vortec headed crate engine, can i run 1.6 rockers?

depends on two things:
1. what is the maximum rated lift of your valve springs - if your springs are only rated to 0.475" lift and the 1.6 rockers give you 0.480" lift, the coils will touch and the springs WILL fail.
2. how much piston-to-valve clearance do you have. this is usually more dependant on camshaft duration but increasing lift may cause problems. the minimum piston-to-valve clearance should not be less than 0.100" on a street engine.
88IROCs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2001, 02:26 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 784
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's

Classifieds Rating: (2)
I had to run taller valve cover to clear my RR's. But, I saw some valve cover spacers in JEG's the other day, those might work for you if you are running preimeter bolt valve covers.

------------------
1986 IROC, fully loaded, Mini Ram'd 383, Art Carr 700R4, Accel DFI, 12 bolt rear, etc, etc......
86 IROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2001, 02:57 AM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Vancouver, B,C, Canada
Posts: 207

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I was told you have to use a narrow body rocker with center bolt heads. Is this true or is my parts dealer just trying to scam me in to buying the more expensive rockers.
TA88GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2001, 05:27 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Monticello, IN USA
Posts: 1,346
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-5 (gonna buy the farm)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I think it depends on the brand of rockers. Some companies make all of their rockers narrow enough to clear the supports of the centerbolt valve covers. Others don't and then advertise the centerbolt compatable rockers under a different part number. I don't have extensive rocker experience from differtent companies, so I can't say who makes rockers that clear, but doesn't advertise them as such.



------------------
Joshua Johnston
1991 Z-28


350, T-5, K&N, Ported Vortec heads, Edelbrock RPM, Holley 750 D.P., HEI, 11.07:1 CR, Comp Cams Roller-.510"/.520"-282*/288* dur., Shorty Headers, Dual 2.5 Exhaust,Dynomax Bullet Mufflers, T&R Motorsports custom air intake
johnsjj2 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2001, 11:28 AM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Livonia, Michigan USA
Posts: 276
Car: '89 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt w/ 4.10 and Eaton Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to raven350 Send a message via AIM to raven350
Yes, on ceter bolt valve heads, most companies offer a narrower roller rocker, some come that way no matter what style you get.

And if you have guide plates, DO NOT use self aligning rockers. You will be trying to align the rockers two different ways at two different spots.

This can definitely cause a pushrod failure.

------------------
13.3 @ 101.3MPH 95 degrees and 95% humidity w/ no tuning on motor

Sportsman II, Gear drive, Perf. Res. chip, SLP 1 3/4" headers, Edelbrock muffler, Trans-go stage 3, Vigilante 9.5", Functional Ram Air hood, SLP roller cam, 24lb ADS injectors, AFPR, 3.45 gears, Stealth intake, 58mm setup, Spohn suspension, and other goodies...


raven

Custom EFI Intake Setup
raven350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2001, 05:37 AM   #13
Supreme Member
 
IROCZZ3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,054
Car: 87 Buick GN
Engine: 3.8L (231 cid) V6
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt G80/ 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 86 IROC:
I have AFR 195 heads on my engine, I am running Comp Cams 1.6's w/ no problem at all. You do not need self aligning rockers. Your heads should have screw-in studs and guide plates. Hope this helps.

</font>
I agree with that...my 190s also come with their guideplates and they specifically say to use theirs only. Just be sure to use HARDENED pushrods with the guideplates or else you'll wear out your pushrods prematurely.




------------------
1989 IROC-Z, ZZ3 shortblock with some bolt-ons.
13.20 @ 108.69, 2.2 60'
IROCZZ3 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2001, 05:37 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review

Tags
15, 16, arms, diffrence, rocker, roller
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details