Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review

Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-07-2004, 08:39 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 78

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Pro-Topline Vortecs vs. pGM Vortecs & Flow

Theres a considerable amount of posts on this board concerning these two pro-topline heads.

This is the only post I found with any mention of an objective flow test. Link

::edit- pic wont attach- its the 6th post down on the link::

These numbers look pretty high and almost a 'too good to be true' number when compared to Chevy High Performance's data. It should be noted that the Stock vortec flow data is printed twice in their mag. The first time (that i saw) was in the much read GM Goodwrench Quest Part 4



compared to CHP cylinder head database flow #'s


Both of these flow tests were done on a 'westech' bench. But the discrepancy bewteen these two posted flow rates is mind blowing. One has a horrible I/E relationship, one good. One has much worse intake flow numbers, one better.

My question is: Though the flow numbers of Pro Topline heads look great and have seemingly amazing I/E relationship, How am I to pick between these two considering how arbitrary these flow numbers seem to be - even with the examples provided by CHP??

And then, how do you quantify BSFC and the other variables that work for power vis a vis cylinder heads. I need good below 5000 rpm torque with an efficient chamber to move around my car.

How's a guy to pick between the two and make the right choice??
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!

Last edited by 9c1Caprice; 01-07-2004 at 09:41 PM.
9c1Caprice is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 01-08-2004, 11:40 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 78

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Anyone?
9c1Caprice is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 05:10 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 644
Car: 1989 GTA Nighthawk
Engine: 389 CID TPI
Transmission: TCI 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
You can't go wrong with Vortec heads for a good torquey street engine. Face it even Edelbrock copied them and then compare their now BEST head against them.
__________________
1989 Pontiac GTA Nighthawk, 389 CID, 10.3:1, Eagle Stroker Crank, Eagle 6 inch rods, KB Dish Pistons, CC XR269-HR-12, Crane 1.5 Golds, Fully Internally Balanced, Ported Exhaust and 1.6 Exhaust Valve Vortec Heads, Headman Ceramic Coated Shorties port matched to Vortec Heads, Ported SLP's, SDPC Base, Ported Plenum, 52mm TB, 30 lb. Injectors, Streetdampr, Crane Hi-6S, Underdrive Crank Pulley, Be-Cool Radiator and dual fans, 450 HP 500 TQ. Vigilante 2800 stall Converter and TCI Steetfighter Trans. Spohn Torque arm w/safety loop, LCA's, Panhard rod and LCA relocation brackets, Aluminum driveshaft, Flowmaster 3" catback, Flowmaster muffler, High Flow 3" Cat, Custom Y-Pipe.
89Warbird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 07:03 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 78

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks for the reply. You make a good point. Everyone is copying them and making good builds with them. Untill I see something more solid and concrete about these pro toplines, I'm going with the tried and true, proven factory pieces.
9c1Caprice is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 09:23 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Carolina
Posts: 294

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Pro-Topline heads are usually more a race oriented than a Vortec's. For max power with supporting mods the Pro-Topline will be the best iron head. However, the Vortec's are excellent in their own right as mentioned above.
Arctic White 91 RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 01:03 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 78

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Arctic White 91 RS
Pro-Topline heads are usually more a race oriented than a Vortec's. For max power with supporting mods the Pro-Topline will be the best iron head. However, the Vortec's are excellent in their own right as mentioned above.
Race oriented- maybe thats it.

There are some problems with the stock vortec heads, such as the combustion chambers need to be cut on the intake port to reduce valve shrouding or to increase swirl and the exhaust port needs a little work.

Of course some of these modifications come at a price.

Were these modifications made to run with tradeoffs (there almost always are tradeoffs) to make the heads run at higher rpm's?

Vortec heads- good for apps under 5000 rpms and Pro's at a higher rpm band?

Or maybe youre talking about the casting's durability and screw-in studs good for higher horsepower/RPM applications
9c1Caprice is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 01:53 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,824

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Vortec heads- good for apps under 5000 rpms and Pro's at a higher rpm band?
Tall 5000 is more of the operating range, say 5800rpm-6000rpm.

For Vortec
OMINOUS_87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2004, 06:50 PM   #8
TGO Supporter
 
89gta383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,518
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt-3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Depending on the rest of your intake system and cam is what determines the heads. The ported L98's have the best E/I ratio, but used they are about $500, so the price knocks them out.

For the cash, I'd pick the vortecs and have them ported in the chambers and exhaust, with better springs and the back cut valves.
__________________
89 Trans Am GTA
89 Formula
89gta383 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2004, 08:25 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The nation's capital
Posts: 2,406
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 89gta383
For the cash, I'd pick the vortecs and have them ported in the chambers and exhaust, with better springs and the back cut valves.
And how much more money does it cost for all of that?
Gunny Highway is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2004, 04:08 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,192
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength

Classifieds Rating: (20)
Quote:
Originally posted by Arctic White 91 RS
Pro-Topline heads are usually more a race oriented than a Vortec's. For max power with supporting mods the Pro-Topline will be the best iron head. However, the Vortec's are excellent in their own right as mentioned above.
I have a set of both. The Pro-Toplines are more performance oriented. The factory Vortecs were originally intended for trucks and that's where my stock factory Vortecs reside...on a 400 SBC built for big torque in my Suburban. The Pro-Toplines pick up where the factory Vortecs stopped. I've found their improvement in flow is not much better. Where they shine is in the improved design. They already have screw-in studs (stockers are pressed), the spring pockets are already enlarged and the guides cut down (both necessary modifications for lifts over .480 on the stockers), improved water jackets for better cooling around the chamber, and much thicker deck surfaces which will accomodate a 45 cc chamber (stockers are pushing it at 58cc). If you intention is to put Vortecs on a milder motor with less than .480 cam lift, go with the factories. If your intentions are bigger, ProToplines...no question. They were built for the performance enthusiast.
wesilva is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2004, 08:11 PM   #11
Moderator
 
Abubaca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: GREENSBORO, NC
Posts: 4,301
Car: 1989 Iroc
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I've read a lot about the Pro-toplines, but does anyone have part #'s?

Maybe I'm looking right past it, but I can't find 'em on the website.
Abubaca is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2004, 08:39 PM   #12
Moderator
 
Abubaca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: GREENSBORO, NC
Posts: 4,301
Car: 1989 Iroc
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
....found it!
Abubaca is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2004, 09:54 AM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 78

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks for the replies. Im reading alot about how the Pro-Toplines are better suited for high horsepower applications due to their improvements related to strength, i.e. thicker castings, screw in studs. However, I'm still looking around for a comparative flow and/or dyno comparison.

I see why people dismiss the heads as 'truck' heads. Weak stock springs, screw in stucs, etc. However, their Iron lt1 ports (flow better than aluminum lt1's) move air great up to .500 and have great mid lift flow numbers. Their contributions to good VE numbers and BSFC are well documented. This has been hashed out on here before, but its too bad there is no good a/b comparison between the two heads.


There is some discussion revolving around flow, but I guess there is no hard info on the subject. Ive been looking everywhere for some flow data. Furthermore, I really appreciate all of the discussion here on these two heads.

Thanks.
9c1Caprice is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2004, 07:18 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Morris, IL
Posts: 1,418
Car: '91 t-top RS; '91 hrdtp Z28
Engine: LO3;383tpi
Transmission: 700r4;very nice 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 zt posi, 3.70 auburn

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I'm running the pro topline vortecs. I can't really compare them to gm vortecs or e-tech heads as I have never run those, but I am very pleased with the pro toplines. I have been interested as well in the flow numbers. What I like about the protoplines is that there was no machining needed for my cams lift (.510 w/ 1.5's) I'm pretty sure they are capable of at least .550" lift.
r90camarors is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2004, 02:13 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 3,893
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
I'm putting together a +.040 350 for my roomates s-10 and we're using the Topline Vortecs. We went w/ them because of the improvements over the GM vortec's, plus I was really impressed w/ Topline's casting quality w/ my 200cc aluminums. He had them flowed and they were pretty well right on Pro's #'s, and where they were different they surpassed the #'s on Pro topline's website. I think they're an excellent head. Cost $420 delivered to my door, bare. Can't beat that.

...now to gasket match them and dropped this polished Crosswind RPM intake on top w/ that 535/555 hyd roller cam..

later, justin...
__________________
Jp Shawgo

1986 camaro - 10.5 outlaw/Outlaw 632
1989 GTA vert
www.sandeperformance.com
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2004, 02:32 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,192
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength

Classifieds Rating: (20)
Shagwell,
I'm finding the need for a custom pushrod length because of the increased deck thickness. Let me know if you have found the same.
wesilva is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 07:34 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Atco, NJ, USA
Posts: 726
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: th400

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Pony Killer Send a message via AIM to Pony Killer
i've been very impressed with my lightly modded factory vortec heads.. they've gotten me into the 11's with a well over 3000lb car, and poor gearing.

As far as modding to the heads i had the bowls blended, valve job, and a slight mill to them, using stock vavles.. including the price of the heads, machine work, all the hardware, and installation, with gaskets cost me 850 bucks.
I had no need for screw in studs. i'm running a comp XE 274 cam.. under .500 lift.. no super duper springs. so the stock studs are good for the time being.

one day i'll dig out the flow sheet again. was the bare heads, peak intake flow was 233 i belive. which is within a very little bit of what they did pre bowl work.. but all the below peak numbers significantly improved.

E/i ration at .500 is 72 or 74% i belive.. it stays in that range through out.

i'd recomend them
__________________
GN predator
Pony Killer is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004, 01:46 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
paul_huryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 972
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to paul_huryk
I suppose Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles ported those Vette heads, considering both sets I have were flow tested at 250cfm+ at 0.500" lift.
__________________
Paul's home page

1984 Camaro 350 LG4 Best: 11.44s at 126.9mph
2002 Acura TL Type S
paul_huryk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004, 02:57 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Dustin Imports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Orlando Land of ****/ Detroit Motor City
Posts: 316
Car: 88 FORMULA
Engine: 350TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to Dustin Imports
Quote:
Originally posted by 89gta383
Depending on the rest of your intake system and cam is what determines the heads. The ported L98's have the best E/I ratio, but used they are about $500, so the price knocks them out.

For the cash, I'd pick the vortecs and have them ported in the chambers and exhaust, with better springs and the back cut valves.
Ive been doing alot of reading on vortecs lately. Pretty set on getting them i thought. but are you saying the stock l98 heads (i have) will flow as good or better when ported? Still learning here. Not fully understanding

Drew
Dustin Imports is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004, 04:22 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
1bad91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 4,187
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I'm sure I'll catch hell for stating the basic facts about my heads, so I'll just post this article:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg vortecflow.jpg (50.9 KB, 248 views)
__________________
1991 Z-28 (Black - Hardtop) 355ci TPI/SLP, Ported Vortec heads, Comp XR276HR-12, Hooker 2210 Longtubes / custom 3" Y-pipe with 3 1/2" mufflex cat-back, Borg Warner T-56, PROM tuned by me!, 3.73's, Hotchkis suspension, custom high-flow lid and ram-air, ALL the bolt-ons, custom Boyd Coddington "1bad91Z" Billet Wheels.
1bad91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004, 10:18 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Chesapeake, Ohio
Posts: 780
Car: 02 WS6 White/Ebony
Engine: Stock LS1 w/SLP Lid
Transmission: T56-Hurst Billet Plus
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (10)
I've had stock 062 vortec's, the pro-topline vortecs, and a set of Edelbrock E-200 vortecs .

I've had all of them side by side on my workbench and compared them.
From best to worst:

E-200's-due mainly to bigger runner size, a better looking exhaust port, and weight reduction. More than enough to feed a 525 horse 383 (although they still needed a light cleaning with a sanding roll).

The pro-toplines come in second, they looked a hell of a lot better than the stock vortec's. Plus they come with alot of perks that you have to pay for in machining on the stock vortecs. Good to 525-550 lift depending on springs and whether you're running hydraulic lifter or roller lifter cam.

The stock vortecs are a nice budget head. If you're building a 350 or 327 with less than 480 lift cam they're great.

I intended on using my pro-toplines for my buildup but had the e-200's dumped in my lap so to speak. Otherwise I'd use them without hesitation. They are still for sale or possible trade parts I need.

The stock vortec's I already had and sold.
drain89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review

Tags
383, head, iron, sbc, westech
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2010 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.