Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review

Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


View Poll Results: Which intake for my combo?
Weiand Xcellerator 10 66.67%
Edelbrock Torker II 5 33.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-27-2005, 07:22 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Cruz'N Bruz'R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Formerly Ottawa, NOW in Southern Ohio
Posts: 2,026
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
2 intakes to choose from...

Ok I have 2 intakes on the shelf to use. I don't have the money to buya Victor Jr, so I have to choose between these two.

- Weiand Xcellerator

or

-Edelbrock Torker II

Both are single plane, 1 has a higher rise than the other.
It's going on my 10.7:1 383ci. with Pro Action Lightning 200cc
a holley 650DP and a Comp XE276 hyd. flat tap.

Which do you think would suit me better?
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
Cruz'N Bruz'R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 06-27-2005, 08:27 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 84

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to DanTheMan_smlk
wow, i wish i had enough knowledge to vote on this poll
__________________
its my "baby"....my post count
DanTheMan_smlk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 11:50 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Cruz'N Bruz'R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Formerly Ottawa, NOW in Southern Ohio
Posts: 2,026
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Does anybody have any input as to which intake and why. I'd like to learn the reasoning behind the opinions.
Cruz'N Bruz'R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 12:31 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
mw66nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wonderful Robins, GA
Posts: 8,622
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: spare lm7
Transmission: 4l60e w/ VIG3600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 4.11:1

Classifieds Rating: (7)
i don't know much about the xcellerator, but i do know that the torker II is about the worst intake known to man. i think that the only one that is worse than the torker II is the torker I. they just don't make that much power. i went from the torker II on my 305 to the Holley street dominator dual plain and picked up like .4 or so in the quarter. i think the wieand intake is taller, i would go with that. the short rise of the torker II really hurts performance. but personally, i'd save my pennies and buy the right part. it's only like $200. that's two weeks pay for me, after bills. i would only put one of those intakes on if you were pressed for time, but if you have the two weeks to spare, then buy the right part. i'd also like to suggest maybe finding a way to earn some more money. nothing more humbling than walking around your neighborhood with a lawnmower in your spare time after work to get some hotrod cash. that's what i do whenever i need something quick.
__________________
Matt

watch for updates at www.walterracecraft.com
vid of new motor: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CbOG...eature=channel
mw66nova is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 01:09 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Cruz'N Bruz'R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Formerly Ottawa, NOW in Southern Ohio
Posts: 2,026
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Losing a job in August. Going back to school in September. getting married in October.

There's is nothing I'd rather do than just order a Vic Jr., but cash is super tight right now. And I just want to drive the damn thing.

But what you say about the intake rise makes sense.
What about the Xcellerator and a carb spacer? I have the hood clearance.
I'm running a T5 so stall is not an issue for me.
Cruz'N Bruz'R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 02:16 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
mw66nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wonderful Robins, GA
Posts: 8,622
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: spare lm7
Transmission: 4l60e w/ VIG3600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 4.11:1

Classifieds Rating: (7)
maybe putting a 1" spacer on the Xcellerator would make up for the poor (next to the V. Jr.) design of the intake. this is something you'll have to do some tuning at the track with. run without it, then run with, you'll probably have to jet up to compensate for the spacer as well.

p.s. Congrats on the marriage! hope all goes well!
mw66nova is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 03:15 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Cruz'N Bruz'R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Formerly Ottawa, NOW in Southern Ohio
Posts: 2,026
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
thanks.

Off topic. generally ar Holleys ready to run out of the box.
I have a 650DP. The jet sizes were 67 pri 73 sec.
I jetted up to 73 pri and 80 sec.
And My oil smells like gas, way too rich, so i put it back to what the carb came with. I guess I could start from there.
Cruz'N Bruz'R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 03:28 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 10,390
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: Twin Turbo 401
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 3.42's

Classifieds Rating: (16)
Send a message via AIM to Orr89RocZ
the xcelerator is similar to the torker II which is the bottom end of the edelbrock intakes. designed for 2500-6500 rpms... i would go xcelerator tho... i havent heard much good about the edel. the performer RPM would be best/better for your motor tho...
Orr89RocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 11:25 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,930
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Nixon1 Send a message via AIM to Nixon1
Yeah I'd step up to the Performers myself....

I wish I knew how different the two actually are though.... Well my rule of thumb is, go for the smaller one. Cause if you go too big, then you've got to up the stall on your converter (not an issue for you though), go with a bigger cam, upgrade the heads as necessary for the new cam....and it turns into a mess. If you think the intake is too SMALL......sell it and buy another one.

But if you're worried about money.....talk to the local hot-rodders, see what you can get used.. An intake isnt exactly a wear item...

And....EBAY!

Last edited by Nixon1; 06-28-2005 at 11:29 PM.
Nixon1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 08:25 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Cruz'N Bruz'R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Formerly Ottawa, NOW in Southern Ohio
Posts: 2,026
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I may have a hookup on a Super vic. I put the Xcellerator on last night. the 4 middle bolts were a PIA.

Hopefully the Super VIC deal goes through. i offered him $100CAN, so like a buck and change US
Cruz'N Bruz'R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2005, 10:55 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,758
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)
A super vic is a high rpm racing intake. It is the wrong intake for your car.

You want a dual plane intake. A high rise dual plane is best.

Edelbrock Performer RPM. or "EPS"
Professional Products Cyclone"Plus" or Typhoon
Weiand "Stealth" 2016

These are the intakes you should be watching for.
Avoid any single plane manifold.

They all will make much more "usable torque" (power) on a application like yours.

You can "improve" your present intake manifold by installing a full divider plate in the plenum. ( improve mid range torque) Weiand ( Holley) still sells this divider.
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2005, 11:01 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,758
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Cruz'N Bruz'R
thanks.

Off topic. generally ar Holleys ready to run out of the box.
I have a 650DP. The jet sizes were 67 pri 73 sec.
I jetted up to 73 pri and 80 sec.
And My oil smells like gas, way too rich, so i put it back to what the carb came with. I guess I could start from there.
73-80 jetting is way too rich for a 650. Thats the right jetting for a 750 or 800cfm holley.

The jet range for a 650 will be 4/5 jet sizes richer or leaner either way. If your motor needs any thing further, there is something else wrong. ( vacuum leak, poor fuel flow volume)

On a Weiand accelorator I'd use 67-76 jetting. You'll probabily need to Dial in the accelerator pumps.

Is this the intake manifold you're using?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg f7546.jpg (40.3 KB, 223 views)
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2005, 05:42 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Rob Wade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Windsor Ontario Canada
Posts: 771
Car: 89 jaguar xjs convertable
Engine: 89 L98 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 dana 44

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I agree with the dual plane intake. How often do you buzz the motor past 4500 rpm. Thats where the intakes your talking about will START to work. The dual plane will work way better down low and mid range where you drive the car 90% of the time. How much gear is in the car?
Rob Wade is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2005, 05:51 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Cruz'N Bruz'R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Formerly Ottawa, NOW in Southern Ohio
Posts: 2,026
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yep thats the intake. it seems to have a little more meat around the ports to seal with the large intake runners better. the Torker intake was hard to get a good seal.

Jet wise, do you mean 67 primary, and 76 secondary?
And, how do you adjust the accelerator pump?
Cruz'N Bruz'R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 12:10 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
mrt89rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tucson AZ where the 3k ft of elevation kills your time
Posts: 759
Car: 89 camaro rs
Engine: 383 .06 over
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
http://store.summitracing.com
enter part# EDL-7101

Thats the best bang for your buck. It's sonds like it is going to be about 30 bucks more then you wanted to spend but that intake is the one that i think you should use. With the information that you have given me.

If i new more about what heads you are running all the specs on your cam and the transmission and gears that you have then i would be able to tell you what intake you should run.

As far as jets goes you are running insanely rich. When i had a 650 holley vc carb. on my 305 with a xe262 cam i was runnin 68 in the front and 74's in the back. The carb was a pos so i had to run it rich(long story). I think you should start off with 68-76 that still might be too rich but i guess you'll see.
__________________
89 cheby RS camaro with a cheby 305 CI, comp262 cam, Holley street n' strip single plain intake, 650cfm demon double pumper,1 5/8" daynomax shorty headers full 3" exhaust with low performance muffler, th350 tranny, 3.73 gear ratio, 3k stall converter, bbk under drive pulleys, spohn sub-frame conectors, 245/50/R16 street legal slicks 125 shot of N2O..... best time: 11.9@113(OLD SET UP)
NEW SET UP: 350 bored .060 block, skat 3.83 crank, milodon high flow oil pump, Keith black silv-o-lite hypereutectic pistons, pink rods, 10.9/1 compression, Canfield 220 65cc heads. Comp Cams solid xs282 555/576 lift .244/252 @.050 110 ls, crain 1.6 full roller rockers, victor jr intake, trick flow hardened push rods, Long tube headers with 3" duel exhaust, hooker aero chamber muffler's

87 Iroc-z LB9 700R4 3.23 gears, 1 5/8" dynomax shorty headers full 3" exhaust with low performance muffler

Last edited by mrt89rs; 07-07-2005 at 12:13 AM.
mrt89rs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 12:43 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
JesasaurusRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 2,668
Car: 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to JesasaurusRex
id get a performer rpm with that cam, check ebay my friend, ebays your friend. Id have no problems with buying a used intake, f*ck i bought used heads, used rockers, and a used cam (yes it was roller) only reason im not using the cam is because i needed a small base circle on...reminds me if anybody wants a solid roller

264/272 @.050
.649/.649 lift w/ 1.6 roller rockers
107LSA PM me looking for 200 shipped obo
JesasaurusRex is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 02:12 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
mrt89rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tucson AZ where the 3k ft of elevation kills your time
Posts: 759
Car: 89 camaro rs
Engine: 383 .06 over
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
[i]264/272 @.050
.649/.649 lift w/ 1.6 roller rockers
107LSA PM me looking for 200 shipped obo [/b]
What engine did you have that cam in?
mrt89rs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 02:28 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
JesasaurusRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 2,668
Car: 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to JesasaurusRex
i didnt run it at all because the regular size base circle would not clear my 3.8" stroke even with H beams

however it was in a 355 with afr 220s and a super vic intake with 12:1 comperssion and 4.56 gears in a 2800lb chevelle that ran a 10.8 if i remember correctly.

http://community.webshots.com/album/248618235xUSWHo/1

pics on that page, 1st and 9th picture are actual pics of that cam and the 2nd picture is a pic of the cam card.
JesasaurusRex is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 02:29 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
JesasaurusRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 2,668
Car: 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to JesasaurusRex
oh and what looks to be like little scratchs or nooks is just cardboard from when it got shipped to me its in perfect condition and has the grind number on it that matches the cam card.
JesasaurusRex is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 11:52 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,758
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Cruz'N Bruz'R
Yep thats the intake. it seems to have a little more meat around the ports to seal with the large intake runners better. the Torker intake was hard to get a good seal.

Jet wise, do you mean 67 primary, and 76 secondary?
And, how do you adjust the accelerator pump?

The info you need is in the tech section at Holley carbs
You'll likely need to switch to a larger accelerator pump shooter(s) and try different linkage cams. get the plenum divider and try it.

Then get a dual plane intake manifold.

If you search the RPM Classifieds You're likely to find one.

Last edited by F-BIRD'88; 07-07-2005 at 11:56 AM.
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review

Tags
carb, intake, jetting, xcellerator
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.