Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-08-2008, 05:31 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 406
Car: '86 Camaro Z/28 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non W/C... for now
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open... for now

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Josh R
chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)

I know Chromemoly is lighter and stronger, but how much of a difference does it make in suspension parts. I was going to get spohn LCAs and was wondering whether i should pay the extra cash for the Chromemoly version. How much lighter is it and will strength be an issue for mild steel.

Also should i go boxed or tubular. I prefer handling more than drag racing if that makes a difference.
__________________
1986 Camaro Z28 Iroc-Z

1/4mile time: 15.4sec @ 92mph
Speed Reached: 125mph
Lateral G's: too many
Slalom Speed: too fast
Braking 60-0: who cares
CAR DOMAIN
Josh R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 06:57 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 10,299
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, open 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)

chromoly and steel weight the same, chromoly is stronger so it is generally used with a thinner wall thinkness. You will have no issues with mild steel. Chromoly can be useful when trying to cut unsprung weight, but not going to notice a difference unless the car is a hardcore strip/track car. I would save my money and go with mild steel.

If you are looking for handling, make sure you get pieces with at least 1 rod end, poly on both sides causes too much bind
//<86TA>\\ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 07:15 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
igotta355z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waco Tx
Posts: 857
Car: 89 IROC, 99 V6 Camaro
Engine: 6.0 Gen III
Transmission: 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Posi 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)

Quote:
Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\ View Post
chromoly and steel weight the same, chromoly is stronger so it is generally used with a thinner wall thinkness. You will have no issues with mild steel. Chromoly can be useful when trying to cut unsprung weight, but not going to notice a difference unless the car is a hardcore strip/track car. I would save my money and go with mild steel.

If you are looking for handling, make sure you get pieces with at least 1 rod end, poly on both sides causes too much bind
dont think ive heard better more sound advice in a long long time...
__________________

FWD FTL!!!
Dont get mad if I call you and idiot i just call them like i see them, If you want to tell me im a jerk save it ive heard it all before....
igotta355z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 07:26 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: northern jerz
Posts: 2,864
Car: heavily modded formula
Engine: 521cuin big block ford!
Transmission: bullet proof ford C-6
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8, 3.55 gears

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)



no point in chromoly unless ur looking for weight savings bc ur able to go thinner with the tubing but keep the strength, plus its fun to say

mild steel is more than adequate if u use the right thickness. some ppl box there stock stuff and i dont see the point really(unless its the stock front Aarm, which i will be reinforcing)... buying new stuff is so cheap now but making it is also alot cheaper. i made my rear LCA's with round mild steel tubing... had to be 3/16" thick too with poly ends i got for like 20$ its insanely stronger than the stock stuff (which u can twist in ur hand) and lighter too! only cost 20$ to make, been on for 2yrs no prob daily driver. i havent experenced the bind everyones talking about yet... my *** end whips around alot lol. if i were to get a pair i would def get one side spherical end tho.

stick to tubular tubing since its all around stronger, boxed is better for lateral forces.
__________________
In the process:
521cuin Big block ford
Ford C-6 trans
Ford 8.8 w/3.55gears, custom shorty Tq arm
customblackbird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 08:59 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Scamo-2.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
Posts: 259
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 1990 - 5.7
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt - 3:45

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)

Great advice guys, I was kinda wondering the same thing. Although now you may be cutting into the profits of some of our sponsers! lol
Scamo-2.8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 10:03 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 406
Car: '86 Camaro Z/28 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non W/C... for now
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open... for now

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Josh R
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)

wow. I love when people give me straight foward answers. Thanks guys. How bout when I get front A-Arms. Can I use Poly all around for A-Arms? Is there anything special you need to install rods ends?
Josh R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 10:07 PM   #7
Supreme Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 10,299
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, open 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)

a-arms dont really twist, just move up and down, so poly is fine. Rod end ones have an advantage of being able to adjust the front for more camber, but again, not going to make a difference on the street
//<86TA>\\ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 10:20 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 406
Car: '86 Camaro Z/28 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non W/C... for now
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open... for now

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Josh R
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)

as long as the front won't bind up. Im guessing the backs bind up because they need to be able to rotate becuase of the solid rear axel. When one side goes down and the other up the LCAs need to twist. Thanks //<86TA>\\.
Josh R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 02:24 PM   #9
Supreme Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 10,299
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, open 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)

true, the rear is a solid axle and articulates, one side goes up other down, and it even moves a little front to back, side to side too.
//<86TA>\\ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 04:52 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 406
Car: '86 Camaro Z/28 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non W/C... for now
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open... for now

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Josh R
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)

really..... :P
__________________
1986 Camaro Z28 Iroc-Z

1/4mile time: 15.4sec @ 92mph
Speed Reached: 125mph
Lateral G's: too many
Slalom Speed: too fast
Braking 60-0: who cares
CAR DOMAIN
Josh R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 04:52 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review

Tags
86, camaro, chrome, chromemoly, chromoly, difference, handle, lighter, mild, molly, moly, steel, stronger, suspension, upgrade
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details