Aftermarket Product ReviewProvide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.
Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!
chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)
I know Chromemoly is lighter and stronger, but how much of a difference does it make in suspension parts. I was going to get spohn LCAs and was wondering whether i should pay the extra cash for the Chromemoly version. How much lighter is it and will strength be an issue for mild steel.
Also should i go boxed or tubular. I prefer handling more than drag racing if that makes a difference.
__________________ 1986 Camaro Z28 Iroc-Z
1/4mile time: 15.4sec @ 92mph Speed Reached: 125mph Lateral G's: too many Slalom Speed: too fast Braking 60-0: who cares CAR DOMAIN
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)
chromoly and steel weight the same, chromoly is stronger so it is generally used with a thinner wall thinkness. You will have no issues with mild steel. Chromoly can be useful when trying to cut unsprung weight, but not going to notice a difference unless the car is a hardcore strip/track car. I would save my money and go with mild steel.
If you are looking for handling, make sure you get pieces with at least 1 rod end, poly on both sides causes too much bind
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)
Quote:
Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
chromoly and steel weight the same, chromoly is stronger so it is generally used with a thinner wall thinkness. You will have no issues with mild steel. Chromoly can be useful when trying to cut unsprung weight, but not going to notice a difference unless the car is a hardcore strip/track car. I would save my money and go with mild steel.
If you are looking for handling, make sure you get pieces with at least 1 rod end, poly on both sides causes too much bind
dont think ive heard better more sound advice in a long long time...
__________________
FWD FTL!!!
Dont get mad if I call you and idiot i just call them like i see them, If you want to tell me im a jerk save it ive heard it all before....
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)
no point in chromoly unless ur looking for weight savings bc ur able to go thinner with the tubing but keep the strength, plus its fun to say
mild steel is more than adequate if u use the right thickness. some ppl box there stock stuff and i dont see the point really(unless its the stock front Aarm, which i will be reinforcing)... buying new stuff is so cheap now but making it is also alot cheaper. i made my rear LCA's with round mild steel tubing... had to be 3/16" thick too with poly ends i got for like 20$ its insanely stronger than the stock stuff (which u can twist in ur hand) and lighter too! only cost 20$ to make, been on for 2yrs no prob daily driver. i havent experenced the bind everyones talking about yet... my *** end whips around alot lol. if i were to get a pair i would def get one side spherical end tho.
stick to tubular tubing since its all around stronger, boxed is better for lateral forces.
__________________ In the process:
521cuin Big block ford
Ford C-6 trans
Ford 8.8 w/3.55gears, custom shorty Tq arm
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)
wow. I love when people give me straight foward answers. Thanks guys. How bout when I get front A-Arms. Can I use Poly all around for A-Arms? Is there anything special you need to install rods ends?
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)
a-arms dont really twist, just move up and down, so poly is fine. Rod end ones have an advantage of being able to adjust the front for more camber, but again, not going to make a difference on the street
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)
as long as the front won't bind up. Im guessing the backs bind up because they need to be able to rotate becuase of the solid rear axel. When one side goes down and the other up the LCAs need to twist. Thanks //<86TA>\\.
Re: chromemoly vs mild steel control arms (and other suspension parts)
really..... :P
__________________ 1986 Camaro Z28 Iroc-Z
1/4mile time: 15.4sec @ 92mph Speed Reached: 125mph Lateral G's: too many Slalom Speed: too fast Braking 60-0: who cares CAR DOMAIN