Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-23-2009, 11:10 PM   #1
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Lowering springs

Just curious about these different springs: http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...4294925023+115
What I'm wanting to know is how much they actually lower our cars, and what are the spring rates?
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 12:52 AM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: northern jerz
Posts: 2,864
Car: heavily modded formula
Engine: 521cuin big block ford!
Transmission: bullet proof ford C-6
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8, 3.55 gears

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: Lowering springs

summits springs? lower about 1" front and rear and have rates close to the prokits.... from what ive heard (aka ppl calling summit and asking the tech) supposidly they are ebachs that dont pass final inspection.

prokits=1"drop front and rear. 714lbin front rate and 100-160lbin proggressive rear rate
sportlines= 1.7" drop front , 1.3" drop rear. 700lbin front rate/80-130lb proggressvive rear rate

hotchkins= 1"drop front and rear. rates are lower than the prokits supposidly. some say 600-650 front and who knows about the rears.
customblackbird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 02:22 AM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lowering springs

That's about all that I needed to know.
Prokit looks like the best option so far...
unless anyone knows about any springs closer to 800lbin?
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 11:29 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: northern jerz
Posts: 2,864
Car: heavily modded formula
Engine: 521cuin big block ford!
Transmission: bullet proof ford C-6
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8, 3.55 gears

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: Lowering springs

global west sells front springs that are in the 800 range. but its just the fronts. they have 3 different types. not sure which one is above 800 but im sure at least 1 is. prob the competition, i would call them and ask.

http://www.globalwest.net/1982-02_Ca..._and_rear..htm
customblackbird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 11:50 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
1986iroc350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: saint cloud,florida
Posts: 333
Car: 1986 Iroc z
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lowering springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregsz-28 View Post
Just curious about these different springs: http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...4294925023+115
What I'm wanting to know is how much they actually lower our cars, and what are the spring rates?
HOWDY!! i just recently installed eibach pro-kit on my 86 Iroc. and YES TOTALLY HAPPY!!! Like CUSTOMBLACKBIRD said with the lowering rate is acurate. make sure u get an adjustable panhard rod to go with your project. that way your rear-end is inline with the rest of your setup. IM COMPLETELY HAPPY with what i did to my Iroc. handle 100% better
__________________
1986 Camaro Iroc-Z 350 TPI Corvette motor 700r4 trans, BMR strut tower brace,BMR adj.Panhard Rod,Energy Sway Bar links,Eibach Pro Kit,J&M street lower control arms,Accel Distributer,wires.Blacked out all lights.5% Limo tint all the way around.


http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/members/1986iroc350-albums.html
1986iroc350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 12:01 AM   #6
Member
 
tonys91rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rincon, Ga.
Posts: 396
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 S/D TPI
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 posi disc

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lowering springs

i went with summit springs and are very satisfied with them.
__________________
tonys91rs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 02:44 AM   #7
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lowering springs

Thanks for the info!
I already have an adjustable panhard rod.

Specifically what I am looking for are non-progressive rate springs, over 800lb in.
I'll give global west a call, maybe I'll be able to end my search there, but I'm not in really in any hurry.

All the eibach springs are progressive rate springs, correct?
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 07:12 PM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eastgate/Cincy Ohio
Posts: 200
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to cookie21 Send a message via Yahoo to cookie21
Re: Lowering springs

I went with the Tenzo R set, and Im not as happy as id like to be. My stock springs were so wore out that the "lowering sprimgs" didnt make that much diffrence at all. The car rides better but the wheel well gap pisses me off. My buddies make fun of me all the time, saying i got the "skyjacker" lowering springs for my camaro.
__________________
Third Gens are the best Gens.
cookie21 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 03:08 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
1986iroc350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: saint cloud,florida
Posts: 333
Car: 1986 Iroc z
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lowering springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cookie21 View Post
I went with the Tenzo R set, and Im not as happy as id like to be. My stock springs were so wore out that the "lowering sprimgs" didnt make that much diffrence at all. The car rides better but the wheel well gap pisses me off. My buddies make fun of me all the time, saying i got the "skyjacker" lowering springs for my camaro.
Well in my opinion the car looks pretty good. Me personally im not into low profile tires. My car looks pretty damn good with the stock p245 50 r16 on them stock rims. Yes you can notice a difference in the way it looks. When you put those skinny little tires on your car then the gap in the fender well is gonna be wider and make it look NOT so lowered. My personal opinion. get rid of those tires.
__________________
1986 Camaro Iroc-Z 350 TPI Corvette motor 700r4 trans, BMR strut tower brace,BMR adj.Panhard Rod,Energy Sway Bar links,Eibach Pro Kit,J&M street lower control arms,Accel Distributer,wires.Blacked out all lights.5% Limo tint all the way around.


http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/album.php?u=72091
1986iroc350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 04:30 PM   #10
TA
Supreme Member
 
TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 1,205
Car: '88 GTA, 90 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI, fed growth hormones
Transmission: 700r4 4u2?
Axle/Gears: 9bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Lowering springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1986iroc350 View Post
Well in my opinion the car looks pretty good. Me personally im not into low profile tires. My car looks pretty damn good with the stock p245 50 r16 on them stock rims. Yes you can notice a difference in the way it looks. When you put those skinny little tires on your car then the gap in the fender well is gonna be wider and make it look NOT so lowered. My personal opinion. get rid of those tires.
I totally agree with 1986IROC350, your tires just don't fill up the fender wells either up and down or front to back, they look wimpy. Options are to go with a larger diameter wheel to run the low profiles, or just ditch the super low profile tires for a regular 50 series, you will gain ground clearance and fill your fenderwells at the same time, so the car will actually look lower with beefier tires.

TA
TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 07:38 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lowering springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cookie21 View Post
I went with the Tenzo R set, and Im not as happy as id like to be. My stock springs were so wore out that the "lowering sprimgs" didnt make that much diffrence at all. The car rides better but the wheel well gap pisses me off. My buddies make fun of me all the time, saying i got the "skyjacker" lowering springs for my camaro.
It looks like you should get higher profile tires, then cut the springs you have to maintain the same ride height, and that will fill the gap around the wheels better.

Car looks great though.
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 08:14 PM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 261
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 383 CI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73, Eibachs, Tokiko Illuminas,

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Re: Lowering springs

I went with the Eibach Sport Line and was terrified that I might hate the ride after. But I've no compaints and our roads here are total crap. Some might say that the difference in how the car looks between pro and sport is subtle but it is noticable. The sport lines give the car a more agressive stance.

Don't forget though, after lowering a car nearly 2" stock shocks won't be doing all that much. Better to upgrade to Tokikos, Bilsteins etc.

Jon
Jonathan Dyer is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 05:12 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
1986iroc350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: saint cloud,florida
Posts: 333
Car: 1986 Iroc z
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Lowering springs

I went with Eibach pro-kit. Lowered my car about 1 inch or so but kept the Factory tires and rims. I feel that if you are gonna have an IROC, the way to go is to have the factory rims to sport it around. Those factory rims STAND OUT ANYWHERE!! In the process of painting my car and doing upgrades i cant believe how many compliments i got on just the factory rims alone. even though the car looked like crap being primered and everything else. I got alot of compliments on the rims. Even had some guy offer me 1000.00 for the rims alone. probably should have took it but. i kept to my word that i would NOT sell them to anyone no matter the price. they are getting harder to find a decent set.
__________________
1986 Camaro Iroc-Z 350 TPI Corvette motor 700r4 trans, BMR strut tower brace,BMR adj.Panhard Rod,Energy Sway Bar links,Eibach Pro Kit,J&M street lower control arms,Accel Distributer,wires.Blacked out all lights.5% Limo tint all the way around.


http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/album.php?u=72091
1986iroc350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 05:12 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review

Tags
1983, 88, camaro, convertable, eibach, gen, inch, lower, lowering, prokit, review, reviews, sportline, springs, summit, tenzo, thirdgen
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details