Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Alternative Port EFI Intakes

Alternative Port EFI Intakes This board is for tech discussions and questions about aftermarket port EFI such as the HSR, MR, SR, BBK, FIRST, etc.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-29-2006, 05:03 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 247
Car: Bone stock 1989 Iroc T-Top,1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7, Carbed 383
Transmission: 700r4, T-56

Classifieds Rating: (1)
MiniRam Vs. StealthRam

With identical set up engines, with both making peak power in the 5000-6000 RPM range,which will make more power?
383
AFR 195
280/288 576/570 comp xtreme FI
58mm TB
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
remltr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 08-29-2006, 05:16 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: sweden
Posts: 2,066
Car: GTA -89
Engine: Blown 415"
Transmission: Probuilt TH700

Classifieds Rating: (0)
On a dyno test the Miniram produced 4hp more than HSR

383" TFS heads and a CC XR288Hr

Superrod magazine did the test, seach its here somewere......
gta324 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2006, 06:56 AM   #3
TGO Supporter/Moderator
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 5,426
Car: '79 Z28
Engine: 400 bored .060 over, forged

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gta324 View Post
On a dyno test the Miniram produced 4hp more than HSR

383" TFS heads and a CC XR288Hr

Superrod magazine did the test, seach its here somewere......
Hrmm. That cam must be a biatch to get the tune dialed in with the 110 lsa.
anesthes is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2006, 10:49 AM   #4
TGO Supporter
 
89gta383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,510
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt-3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
For the price, I'd pick the stealthram.
__________________
89 Trans Am GTA
89 Formula
89gta383 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2006, 05:53 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 882

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by remltr View Post
With identical set up engines, with both making peak power in the 5000-6000 RPM range,which will make more power?
383
AFR 195
280/288 576/570 comp xtreme FI
58mm TB
Someone stated the Miniram made 4 more peak horses in the SuperRod intake shoot-out (which is similar to your build), but the StealthRam made 22HP and 28lb/ft TQ more than the Miniram at 4600 rpm and about that same difference at 3000 rpm - that's a huge amount of power under the curve you would leave on the table with the MiniRam - especially with the rpm drop you get between gears with the 700r4 transmission.
BadSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2006, 06:17 PM   #6
TGO Supporter/Moderator
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 5,426
Car: '79 Z28
Engine: 400 bored .060 over, forged

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadSS View Post
Someone stated the Miniram made 4 more peak horses in the SuperRod intake shoot-out (which is similar to your build), but the StealthRam made 22HP and 28lb/ft TQ more than the Miniram at 4600 rpm and about that same difference at 3000 rpm - that's a huge amount of power under the curve you would leave on the table with the MiniRam - especially with the rpm drop you get between gears with the 700r4 transmission.
True but what cam did they use? the cam you'd use on a HSR probably wont be the same one you use on a miniram.

And how much time did they spend tuning between intakes?

-- Joe
anesthes is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2006, 10:09 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 882

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by anesthes View Post
True but what cam did they use? the cam you'd use on a HSR probably wont be the same one you use on a miniram.

And how much time did they spend tuning between intakes?

-- Joe
They claimed they used an Accell DFI management system to get the best fuel and ignition timing for each. So,, your guess on how close they accomplished that claim is as good as any. One thing worth noting was they used a 58mm T/B on the StealthRam (Holley supplied) and a 52mm (TPiS supplied) T/B on the Miniram,, which at that power level could mean 10-11 more HP at peak and progressively less as the rpms drop with 5 - 6 more at 4600 rpm. So the potential differences would be the MiniRam making 11 - 12 more peak power and 17hp and 22 bl/ft less at 4600 rpm than the StealthRam on their engine (383 w/288HR cam).

You could get the power curves for each intake close by running different cams - shorter runner intakes need less cam duration to make the same upper RPM HP,, and you can tighten the lobe spread to give it a little more punch in the midrange,,, but the HSR with 6.5" runners is still a short runner intake and what ever cam tricks you use to get the average power up on the Miniram,, the same "tricks" would apply to the StealthRam. The runners on the Miniram are just too dang short for most automatic transmission applications,, but I think the same of the StealthRam as well.

It may sound like I'm a Miniram hater, but I'm not. I'd be glad it was available if I had a Corvette that I road raced with a 434 SBC in front of a six-speed close ratio transmission and wanted to keep the stock hood.
BadSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 11:14 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
MikeH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Fla
Posts: 1,779
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: GMPP 93/4L60
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (6)
I think there both great intakes.But like someone else said for the price i would go with the stealthram. And it would probably have more area under the curve all things being equal. And not have any lean cylinders to worry about.

I love the midrange of the SuperRam though.
__________________
Black 90 IROC
SuperRamed 406
MikeH is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 11:19 AM   #9
TGO Supporter
 
89gta383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,510
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt-3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
I like the superram also, but for the price and the additional portwork needed to get it to flow so you can turn any rpms, the stealthram still beats it price-wise.
__________________
89 Trans Am GTA
89 Formula
89gta383 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 12:11 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
MikeH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Fla
Posts: 1,779
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: GMPP 93/4L60
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (6)
I agree...I had to port mine alot to get it to pull to 5500. Power peaks around 5000 on my 406. On a 350 the topend is better. Still It is a torque style intake. Good luck finding a SuperRam.

If i was in the market for an intake right now i would be looking towards the stealthRam. Looks pretty damn cool too.
MikeH is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Alternative Port EFI Intakes

Tags
383, 406, dyno, intake, lawrence, mass, mini, miniram, plane, ram, sbc, single, stealth, test, xr288hr
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.