Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Alternative Port EFI Intakes
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Alternative Port EFI Intakes This board is for tech discussions and questions about aftermarket port EFI such as the HSR, MR, SR, BBK, FIRST, etc.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-26-2009, 09:49 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
YenkoST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 700
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: 383 HSR
Transmission: 700R4 w/shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.73 locker

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to YenkoST
HSR to Single plane questions

Ok....first of all thinking about going from a HSR to a Victor Jr. Single plane or something equal to it with a 4 barrel throttle body 1000 cfm. Now I see a lot of people routing their lines in parallel (2 feed lines) instead of a circuit (1 entrance feed). What are the benefits of this?

I have a 383, 10.89:1 compression, AFR 195cc heads with a mild cam that I'll be upgrading as well....is there anything that is different when thing about camshafts for these two setups....in other words, does one perfer more duration split than the other or does one like less than the other...just trying to get a feel for what cam I'll get next. Currently I have a 224/230 XFI grind that is making my DCR about 8.7:1. Looking at going to a GM 847, 280 XFI, etc to lower the DCR a bit.

I'm running 32 lb/hr injectors.....should I upgrade to 38s or 42s that way I have room to grow for a later date?

Thanks for the help guys.
__________________
1990 Chevrolet C1500 Sport
Always a work in progress!!
YenkoST is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 10:47 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 15,641
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: Twin Turbo 401
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 2.73's

Classifieds Rating: (16)
Send a message via AIM to Orr89RocZ
Re: HSR to Single plane questions

Quote:
What are the benefits of this?
Nothing really except when you start making big power. I was planning on doing parrallel lines for my turbo motor but there are many many many guys making 1000whp with series rails so i'm not worried. Its easier to plumb series anyway so I'd stick with that.

Cam shaft design shouldnt really change. I'd keep it a few degree split like 4 degrees and go from there. Anything in the 230 degree range on the intake would be a great cam for a motor like that.

32 lbs at stock fuel pressure is fine for probly 400whp. I ran 42's to be safe and got a good deal on them but I think they are overkill. If you need more fuel, bump the pressure up to like LSx range of 55-58 psi and should make those 32's act like 37's which will feed that motor with any of those cams you have listed.
__________________

1989 Twin Turbo IROC-Z
"Twin Turbo 401 Buildup Pics "
"FQuick Garage"
9.86 at 141 mph 14psi, pump gas street tune
Orr89RocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 11:33 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
YenkoST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 700
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: 383 HSR
Transmission: 700R4 w/shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.73 locker

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to YenkoST
Re: HSR to Single plane questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ View Post
Nothing really except when you start making big power. I was planning on doing parrallel lines for my turbo motor but there are many many many guys making 1000whp with series rails so i'm not worried. Its easier to plumb series anyway so I'd stick with that.

Cam shaft design shouldnt really change. I'd keep it a few degree split like 4 degrees and go from there. Anything in the 230 degree range on the intake would be a great cam for a motor like that.

32 lbs at stock fuel pressure is fine for probly 400whp. I ran 42's to be safe and got a good deal on them but I think they are overkill. If you need more fuel, bump the pressure up to like LSx range of 55-58 psi and should make those 32's act like 37's which will feed that motor with any of those cams you have listed.
Sounds good...I might throw in the cam that I already have....234/242 with .54x lift on 1.5 rockers on a 111 lsa. I'll probably put 1.6 rockers with that

I'm running the 32s right now at 43 psi. Thinking about going to 38s just to be safe because I'm running 1 5/8" headers but I'm going to build me a set of 1 3/4" or run a turbo with about 5 psi for kicks until I can lower the compression some. Trailblazer SS runs 11:1 and running about 6-7 psi.
YenkoST is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 11:33 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Alternative Port EFI Intakes

Tags
camshaft, design, efi, plane, single
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details