Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Alternative Port EFI Intakes
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Alternative Port EFI Intakes This board is for tech discussions and questions about aftermarket port EFI such as the HSR, MR, SR, BBK, FIRST, etc.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-16-2009, 02:00 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Camaero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 353
Car: 1987 IROC Z/28 Camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt w/ 4.10s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Large Tube Runners vs. ASR

Right now I have new heads, a big mouth intake, exhaust, cam, custom tune, slight airbox mods, and various other little things.

Who has used the large tube runners (or another version/ make) and what can you tell me about them? I read that TPI shootout article and saw the peak hp and tq differences between all of the setups, but that doesn't always tell you everything.

I would like a HSR or MR but I need it to be CA legal... or at least hidden enough so that it doesn't matter. So my options are either the larger tubes, or the ASR.

I already have a big mouth manifold, so I'm just 400 (or is it 500?) bucks away from the large tube/ big mouth setup. How good is this combo? How good is it compared to the ASR? The ASR seems to be the least favorite out of the MR and the HSR so it would be nice to hear some feedback.

Thanks.
__________________
“There's a way to do it better - find it.”
Camaero is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 03:46 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove
Posts: 2,994
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: '95 B-body LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LSD

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to Thirdgen89GTA Send a message via Yahoo to Thirdgen89GTA
Re: Large Tube Runners vs. ASR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaero View Post
Right now I have new heads, a big mouth intake, exhaust, cam, custom tune, slight airbox mods, and various other little things.

Who has used the large tube runners (or another version/ make) and what can you tell me about them? I read that TPI shootout article and saw the peak hp and tq differences between all of the setups, but that doesn't always tell you everything.

I would like a HSR or MR but I need it to be CA legal... or at least hidden enough so that it doesn't matter. So my options are either the larger tubes, or the ASR.

I already have a big mouth manifold, so I'm just 400 (or is it 500?) bucks away from the large tube/ big mouth setup. How good is this combo? How good is it compared to the ASR? The ASR seems to be the least favorite out of the MR and the HSR so it would be nice to hear some feedback.

Thanks.
What do you mean by ASR? Arizona Speed and Marine runners? They are the best factory compatible runners you can get, but they cost a pretty penny. Too bad you can't run a HSR, most cost effective intake out there aside from converting a LT1 intake.

They double as a weight loss mod too.

I had them on my old engine before I went stealthram.

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/at...-upgrade01.jpg

Last edited by Thirdgen89GTA; 06-16-2009 at 03:57 PM.
Thirdgen89GTA is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 04:20 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Camaero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 353
Car: 1987 IROC Z/28 Camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt w/ 4.10s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Large Tube Runners vs. ASR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA View Post
What do you mean by ASR? Arizona Speed and Marine runners? They are the best factory compatible runners you can get, but they cost a pretty penny. Too bad you can't run a HSR, most cost effective intake out there aside from converting a LT1 intake.

They double as a weight loss mod too.

I had them on my old engine before I went stealthram.

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/at...-upgrade01.jpg
By ASR I mean Accel Super Ram. I would love to run a HSR... and I still might... but I really don't want to possibly be forced to swap it out every two years.

From what I read, the TPIS (Large Tube Runners) runners are made by Arizona Speed and Marine... is that true?

One thing I liked about that TPI shootout was the amount of torque the runners + big mouth put out... I love to feel me some torque but I want top end too... I just don't want to waste money you know?
Camaero is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 05:53 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove
Posts: 2,994
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: '95 B-body LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LSD

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to Thirdgen89GTA Send a message via Yahoo to Thirdgen89GTA
Re: Large Tube Runners vs. ASR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaero View Post
By ASR I mean Accel Super Ram. I would love to run a HSR... and I still might... but I really don't want to possibly be forced to swap it out every two years.

From what I read, the TPIS (Large Tube Runners) runners are made by Arizona Speed and Marine... is that true?

One thing I liked about that TPI shootout was the amount of torque the runners + big mouth put out... I love to feel me some torque but I want top end too... I just don't want to waste money you know?
Have you considered a First intake? Its like TPI, but MUCH better.

Yes, the TPIS runners are the same as the AS&M runners.
Thirdgen89GTA is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 06:45 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Camaero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 353
Car: 1987 IROC Z/28 Camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt w/ 4.10s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Large Tube Runners vs. ASR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA View Post
Have you considered a First intake? Its like TPI, but MUCH better.

Yes, the TPIS runners are the same as the AS&M runners.

Thanks for taking the time to help. It's much appreciated.

I haven't really found too much information about First intakes. Is it just like another HSR but with another design or is there more to it? Looks like the cost is about the same... Has anyone put one on the dyno and compared it to some of the others?
Camaero is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 07:02 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove
Posts: 2,994
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: '95 B-body LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LSD

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to Thirdgen89GTA Send a message via Yahoo to Thirdgen89GTA
Re: Large Tube Runners vs. ASR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaero View Post
Thanks for taking the time to help. It's much appreciated.

I haven't really found too much information about First intakes. Is it just like another HSR but with another design or is there more to it? Looks like the cost is about the same... Has anyone put one on the dyno and compared it to some of the others?
Its a TPI on steroids. Massive runners, massive ports. If you want a traditional LTR type tpi system its better than any TPI out there.
Thirdgen89GTA is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 07:49 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Camaero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 353
Car: 1987 IROC Z/28 Camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt w/ 4.10s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Large Tube Runners vs. ASR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA View Post
Its a TPI on steroids. Massive runners, massive ports. If you want a traditional LTR type tpi system its better than any TPI out there.
Any idea how it compares to a HSR?
Camaero is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 10:26 PM   #8
Supreme Member
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove
Posts: 2,994
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: '95 B-body LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LSD

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to Thirdgen89GTA Send a message via Yahoo to Thirdgen89GTA
Re: Large Tube Runners vs. ASR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaero View Post
Any idea how it compares to a HSR?
The HSR is about equal to a built TPI system, it just has its power in a slightly different place. HSR shines through by losing a minimal amount of torque in the low range, but gaining a massive boost in the top end with a mild peak increase. So you can run more gear.

The first injection system is a decent boost in HP, but massive in torque.
This is the mfg's site. http://www.firstfuelinjection.com/products.htm

This is essentiall the old electromotive TPI setup. Nothing is compatible with the factory TPI system.

GM TPI runner vs First Runner. GM TPI = 1.48" ID, First = I think 2" ID.


No use rehashing all of the First TPI info though, just do a forum search for it. Tons of reviews, some old magazine articles showing dyno graphs, and lots of info.

First TPI with a vortec base and vortec heads on a mild cam = easy 300rwhp with over 400lb/ft.

Last edited by Thirdgen89GTA; 06-16-2009 at 10:29 PM.
Thirdgen89GTA is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 10:26 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Alternative Port EFI Intakes

Tags
accel, arizona, dyno, horsepower, large, long, make, marine, reviews, runner, runners, speed, style, tpi, tpis, tube
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details