Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Alternative Port EFI Intakes
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Alternative Port EFI Intakes This board is for tech discussions and questions about aftermarket port EFI such as the HSR, MR, SR, BBK, FIRST, etc.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2010, 07:59 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 9
Car: 1995 Chevy Caprice 9C1, Police Pack
Engine: 350 ci, LT1
Transmission: 4L60E. S10 TC
Axle/Gears: 8.5" corporate w/3.73 w/TruTrack LS

Classifieds Rating: (0)
LTx intake VS Alternative EFI intakes RE:Lowend TQ?

A few days ago I was in discussion with a reputable engine builder in Illinois RE: a 383 LT1 build. When I expressed my desire to ditch the stock LT1 intake manifold in favor of a carb style single plane intake the tech said to me that I will experience a big decrease in low and midrange torque in going to the single plane.

I thought this was counterintuitive I was lead to believe that the shorter the intake runner the lower the low and midrange torque and the longer the runner are the greater the torque like the famous or infamous Tuned Port Intake on the L98.

He went on to say that though the runners on the LT1 intake are indeed extremely short (3") but the intake has a small plenum volume and this enables the engine to have very port velocities at low and midrange RPM's which aids in cylinder filling at such low RPM's hence the high torque even with short runners

1. Is this true??.

2. What is yours or anybody else who know's experiences with changes in low and midrange torque in switching out the stock LT1 intake for a carb style single plane or anything else(Holley Stealthram, Accel Superram, etc.)????
B'klyn9C1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 09:02 AM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Way out west, long way south
Posts: 3,450
Car: 1990 Vette
Engine: 383 SP EFI 4bbl TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: 4 Link Coilover 9" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (13)
Re: LTx intake VS Alternative EFI intakes RE:Lowend TQ?

Single plane intakes are popular choice for big cube or top end engines because each port gets equal air flow.Log style plenums with front mounted TB's are know for hi-rev distribution problems resulting in some cyl running rich while other are lean
vetteoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 10:54 AM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Old Bridge "Raceway Park", N.J.
Posts: 5,342

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: LTx intake VS Alternative EFI intakes RE:Lowend TQ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by B'klyn9C1
A few days ago I was in discussion with a reputable engine builder in Illinois RE: a 383 LT1 build. When I expressed my desire to ditch the stock LT1 intake manifold in favor of a carb style single plane intake the tech said to me that I will experience a big decrease in low and midrange torque in going to the single plane....
He's talking old school mythology. Swapping intakes will in fact effect your powerband, but thats if you do nothing else to compliment the new component. When it gets right down to it, if you swap to a carb style intake, you can make up whatever loss of torque you experience down low with a simple cam swap. Go with whatever style intake manifold you want to, then get yourself a custom camshaft....
Street Lethal is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 04:47 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 9
Car: 1995 Chevy Caprice 9C1, Police Pack
Engine: 350 ci, LT1
Transmission: 4L60E. S10 TC
Axle/Gears: 8.5" corporate w/3.73 w/TruTrack LS

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: LTx intake VS Alternative EFI intakes RE:Lowend TQ?

Street Lethal,

You are right regarding in fixing any torque loss issues with a custom cam is a maybe a more modern approach to the problem, That what the guys at TPIS suggested to me some time back when I told them about my dissatisfaction about the stock LTx intake manifold's air distribution. But as Vetteoz pointed out that single planes are a popular choice among guys who are building max effort LT1s for reason he pointed out. But I think that being that the runners on carb style single plane sare twice as long as the stock LTx intake that it could be viable option for as guys you are building Hi Performance street LTx's for daily drivers.
B'klyn9C1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 04:47 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Alternative Port EFI Intakes

Tags
efi, fast, flow, fuel, injection, intake, intakes, lt1, ltx, manifold, numbers, plane, single, stock, thirdgen
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details