Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Brake Board
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Brake Board Looking to upgrade or get the most out of what you have stock? All brake discussions go here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-26-2002, 01:36 AM   #1
Member
 
Colt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Downers Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 241
Car: '89 Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Interesting 1LE upgrade installation problem!

This is a copy of the email I sent AndyZ28. Hopefully he'll respond.



Andy,

I've been following this 1LE upgrade craze ever since it began almost two years ago. You'll probably remember my post on the message board. Here's the link. http://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/show...daptor+bracket

I was able to buy a pair of the coveted caliper carrier brackets that are no longer available through GM. Just this week, I'm finally getting around to installing the whole setup. I have run into an interesting problem.

It seems that the adaptor bracket #18016034 is too thick. Both of mine measure out to a thinkness of just about 5/8 inch.

The problem that arrises is that when I bolt the carrier to the bracket, there is not enough clearence for the carrier to slide over the rotor. I measured my rotor thickness and it's about 1.038" thick. Have you seen this problem before. What is the standard thinkness of the adaptor bracket #18016034?

What's interesting is that the caliper itself, loaded with the pads fits over the rotor just fine. Is my bracket just too thick??????





Please let me know.


Thank you,
__________________
'89 Formula.
383 storker in progress.
Colt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2002, 10:09 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
ebmiller88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,416
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Send a message via AIM to ebmiller88
Hey Colt, I'll measure my brackets and rotor tonight and post what I find here, with pics.

Ed
ebmiller88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2002, 10:53 AM   #3
Member
 
Colt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Downers Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 241
Car: '89 Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks, I'm going to measure mine again today and take some pictures also with my digi camera. I'll post the results here.
__________________
'89 Formula.
383 storker in progress.
Colt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2002, 03:17 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 1,381
Car: 89 Formula / 09 G8
Engine: None / LS3
Transmission: None / 6 spd
Axle/Gears: 3:42 / 3:27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Ok, ignore what I said. I thought you were talking about the rear brakes. Sorry.

Last edited by Omega; 06-27-2002 at 08:46 AM.
Omega is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2002, 09:39 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
ebmiller88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,416
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Send a message via AIM to ebmiller88
Ok, here's some shots I took. The caliper bracket is 5 13/16" in overall length, and is right at 5/8" thick.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1lebracket2.jpg (93.7 KB, 512 views)
ebmiller88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2002, 09:46 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
ebmiller88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,416
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Send a message via AIM to ebmiller88
My pics are huge so I won't post another one. The rotor is about 1 1/8" thick, my pics were blurry.
ebmiller88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 01:25 AM   #7
Member
 
Colt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Downers Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 241
Car: '89 Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Okay, here are my measurements that I took today. It seems that our bracket width is the same at 5/8". My exact measure was 6 thousands less, but that is negligible. Our rotor width is also just about the same, the difference is negligible. Mine is about 1 1/25" which is the same as 1.040" as seen in the picture. If our adaptor brackets and rotors are the same there must be a difference in the carriers. What are your measurements in the place where I took my sample on the carrier??? I'm wondering if that is different or the surface where the adaptor bolts to has a different offset.

Andy, I hope you can jump into this also.

I also included pictures of the numbers cast into the carriers. These aren't the GM part #'s, but I'm wondering if your's are the same?????? Let me know, please.
















__________________
'89 Formula.
383 storker in progress.
Colt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 01:28 AM   #8
Member
 
Colt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Downers Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 241
Car: '89 Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Omega, we are talking about the front brakes.
Colt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 01:52 AM   #9
TGO Supporter
 
Justins86bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Another world, some other time
Posts: 3,795
Car: 86 & 92 Firebirds
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Edit: deleted to avoid confusion Appearently the shop manual has an incorrect picture of how the brakes bolt up. SO just ignore my post

Last edited by Justins86bird; 06-27-2002 at 03:16 AM.
Justins86bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 01:53 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: So-cal.
Posts: 1,220

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Colt

All is O.K. what you have to do is not try to install the bracket and the carrier at the same time.

The proper way is to mount the bracket to the spindle than the rotor will go over the bracket than you can drop the carrier over the rotor down to the bracket.

When your done the bracket will be inside the rotor ( on the back side ) thats the reason you can't bolt the carrier to the bracket and slide it over the rotor.

Hope this helps

Jerry
JERRYWHO is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 02:07 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: So-cal.
Posts: 1,220

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Justin

What parts book did you get that from.

The drawing lines showing the carrier on the out side of the bracket are not right.


Jerry
JERRYWHO is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 02:20 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: So-cal.
Posts: 1,220

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Colt

Just look at http://www.ws6transam.org/1LEbrake.html

Jerry
JERRYWHO is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 03:12 AM   #13
TGO Supporter
 
Justins86bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Another world, some other time
Posts: 3,795
Car: 86 & 92 Firebirds
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by JERRYWHO
Justin

What parts book did you get that from.

The drawing lines showing the carrier on the out side of the bracket are not right.


Jerry
I got that out of the GM 92 shop manual. Hmmm. Better get rid of it to avoid confusion if its wrong.
Justins86bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 06:59 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Midlothian,VA. 23112-6108
Posts: 1,458
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 5.0 w/ Holly carb
Transmission: TH-700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I believe the problem is one of assembly techique.

1)The adapter bracket must be mounted onto the spindle first.

2) Then the rotor is attached to the spindle.

3) Now attach the caliper carrier to the adapter bracket.

4) Lastly, install the caliper into the caliper carrier.

Tom, the image you posted shows the adapter bracket resting against the rotor. The image I have attached show quite clearly that the adapter bracket rides inside the rotor.

So if you will place the adapter inside of the rotor and reassemble everything. I belive the problem will be solved.

Thanx,ANDYZ28
Attached Images
File Type: jpg clearance.jpg (95.7 KB, 449 views)
ANDYZ28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 08:37 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
ebmiller88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,416
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Send a message via AIM to ebmiller88
Great shots, Colt. Better than what I had. I'm with Andy and Jerry on this one. I found that out when I put my rear brakes on earlier this week. Rotor will not go on if the caliper carrier is already bolted on. Bracket, then rotor, then carrier....I'd do that.

Ed

Last edited by ebmiller88; 06-27-2002 at 11:07 AM.
ebmiller88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 08:55 AM   #16
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 1,381
Car: 89 Formula / 09 G8
Engine: None / LS3
Transmission: None / 6 spd
Axle/Gears: 3:42 / 3:27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Colt:

I didn't see a spindle in the pics, do you have any yet? You might find that it works when everything is bolted up to the spindle.
Omega is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 01:44 PM   #17
Member
 
Colt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Downers Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 241
Car: '89 Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Gentlemen, thank you forthe help! Thanks Ed, Jerry, and Andy. I don't know why I didn't realize this myself. I completely understand the assembly process now.

Thanks again.
__________________
'89 Formula.
383 storker in progress.
Colt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 01:49 PM   #18
Member
 
Colt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Downers Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 241
Car: '89 Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Okay guys, thanks for solving that problem. Now on to the next. I realized that the brake line banjo bolt from my old iron stock caliper does not fit into the 1LE caliper. Anybody know what size the banjo bolt for the 1LE caliper needs to be????
__________________
'89 Formula.
383 storker in progress.
Colt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2002, 03:11 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
ebmiller88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,416
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Send a message via AIM to ebmiller88
I just got 2 yesterday, but I don't have the wrapper with me. Ran me $7 for the pair from dealer.

From Dan Burke's page:

http://www.ws6transam.org/1LEbrake.html

It's P/N 10286122.

HTH...

Ed
ebmiller88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2002, 01:00 AM   #20
Member
 
Colt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Downers Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 241
Car: '89 Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Interesting Ed. From my research that I did today, a GM dealer told me that the part number for the banjo bolts is 14000404. And I made sure he was looking at the 2 piston 1LE caliper application. I've also determined that the thread for the banjo bolt is an M8 X 1.0 pitch.

Ed, is there anyway you can find the receipt or the wrapper just to verify this part number????




Tom
Colt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2002, 06:41 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Midlothian,VA. 23112-6108
Posts: 1,458
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 5.0 w/ Holly carb
Transmission: TH-700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Damn, I've got to get that darned "CD" done!

Here is a photo and part# of the bolt you will need.

Thanx,ANDYZ28
Attached Images
File Type: jpg banjo bolt.jpg (75.0 KB, 366 views)
ANDYZ28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2002, 09:27 AM   #22
Member
 
Colt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Downers Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 241
Car: '89 Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
thanks for the part number guys. It seems that the P/N 10286122 for the banjo bolt is correct. Andy, do you think that it is a M8 X 1.0 pitch thread??? None of the chain part stores carry this size. It seems like it's only available through GM. I can't even find anyone on the internet who sells an M8 X 1.0 banjo bolt.
Colt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2002, 10:02 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Midlothian,VA. 23112-6108
Posts: 1,458
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 5.0 w/ Holly carb
Transmission: TH-700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
GM only! The parts stores have no clue!

Thanx,ANDYZ28

I have them in stock if you are tired of looking.
ANDYZ28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2002, 01:14 AM   #24
Member
 
Colt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Downers Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 241
Car: '89 Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
You're right, the part stores have noooooo clue. I already ordered from GM and I'll have it on Tuesday.

Thanks anyway.


Tom
Colt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2002, 06:03 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 522

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I too am almost done with my 1LE front brakes. the 89 Factory manual is all wrong and very incomplete.

the installation process is definatly a PITA.

and torquing the carrier to 137 ft pounds in the fender well on the inside is ridiculous.
Eightyninef is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2002, 06:53 PM   #26
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 1,381
Car: 89 Formula / 09 G8
Engine: None / LS3
Transmission: None / 6 spd
Axle/Gears: 3:42 / 3:27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
137!!! The BAER carriers only call for 84 ft/#'s!
Omega is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2002, 06:57 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
ebmiller88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,416
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Send a message via AIM to ebmiller88
I just put my brackets on the spindles on Monday, and I also thought 137# was way too far up there. I never reached it with my torque wrench. I felt that I was close to stripping out the threads in the spindle so I quit. I put red Loctite on the bolts so I'm sure they'll hold.
ebmiller88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2002, 07:58 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 522

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The bracket into the spindle is 87 ft lbs.

the carrier into the bracket is 137 ft lbs which is from behind and very difficult. especially if you ever want to pull the rotor and repack bearings. I think it is rather stupid if you ask me.

either than or the 89 FSM is all wrong, which I suspect because the pictures are all wrong. and I think 89 is the first year of the big brakes.

does anyone have a 92 FSM? that should be correct.
__________________
tighten your 9 bolt posi!
shims for sale.
Eightyninef is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2002, 02:12 AM   #29
TGO Supporter
 
Justins86bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Another world, some other time
Posts: 3,795
Car: 86 & 92 Firebirds
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Larry Burd
either than or the 89 FSM is all wrong, which I suspect because the pictures are all wrong. and I think 89 is the first year of the big brakes.

does anyone have a 92 FSM? that should be correct.
I have the 92 manual. I posted the pic out of it earlier, but since I found out it was wrong, I removed it. I guess GM never bothered to correct it.

Last edited by Justins86bird; 07-15-2002 at 04:25 AM.
Justins86bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2002, 07:00 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Midlothian,VA. 23112-6108
Posts: 1,458
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 5.0 w/ Holly carb
Transmission: TH-700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
All of the "GM" service manual images are wrong. That is why I am soon to have a 1LE front, and rear brake upgrade "CD" published. Some members have already seen sample images from the upcoming "CD".

It may sound corny to some of you. But the reason that I went to all the trouble to gather and publish a "CD" with all of the required pictures and info. Is safety!

For example; The mixup with the bolt torque. And Loctite is not to be used. Brake pads installed backwards. "Why can't I get the pin into the brake pads?" Brake pads installed without the anti rattle springs. ETC.

Those of you on this board who know me. Know that the "Safety Thing" is a big deal to me. If someone is going to do a brake conversion. they should have ALL available information which will help them do it Safely.

Thanx,ANDYZ28
ANDYZ28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2002, 07:58 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 522

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Justin 86

Justin86

can you fax me the section from the 92 manual?
and I'll compare it to the 89 manual.
it's called the guided disk brake section.

Andy,
the caliper carrier bolts come pre-loctied from the factory. so that has to be correct. I do question the 137 ft-lbs of torque though, even though I did about 130 ft-lbs. I do not look forward to removing my rotors, or repacking bearings..........
__________________
tighten your 9 bolt posi!
shims for sale.
Eightyninef is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2002, 08:53 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Midlothian,VA. 23112-6108
Posts: 1,458
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 5.0 w/ Holly carb
Transmission: TH-700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The adapter braket to spindle bolts do not come with loctite attached to them.

I have attached an image of the GM part# 11508133 as it was removed from the package.

Thanx,ANDYZ28
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dcp05384.jpg (95.7 KB, 187 views)
ANDYZ28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2002, 08:53 PM   #33
TGO Supporter
 
Justins86bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Another world, some other time
Posts: 3,795
Car: 86 & 92 Firebirds
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Justin 86

Quote:
Originally posted by Larry Burd
Justin86

can you fax me the section from the 92 manual?
and I'll compare it to the 89 manual.
it's called the guided disk brake section.
Dont have a fax I can email it to you. Email me if you want.
Justins86bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2002, 09:01 PM   #34
TGO Supporter
 
Justins86bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Another world, some other time
Posts: 3,795
Car: 86 & 92 Firebirds
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by ANDYZ28
The adapter braket to spindle bolts do not come with loctite attached to them.

I have attached an image of the GM part# 11508133 as it was removed from the package.

Thanx,ANDYZ28
My 11508133 bolts are still in the sealed bag and don't have loctite on them either. But 14084051 does.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1lebolts.jpg (75.7 KB, 178 views)

Last edited by Justins86bird; 07-15-2002 at 09:07 PM.
Justins86bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2002, 09:16 PM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 522

Classifieds Rating: (0)
justin, sure email me .. larryburd@mail.com
thx a bunch!!

andy...
the bolts from the caliper carrier to the bracket come pre-loctited. re-read my post above, then look at justins picture. you'll see what I mean.
Eightyninef is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2002, 09:16 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Brake Board

Tags
10286122, 12, 14084051, 18016034, 1le, banjo, bolt, brake, cheap, conversion, number, part, rotor, spindle, thickness, thirdgen, upgrade
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details