Brake BoardLooking to upgrade or get the most out of what you have stock? All brake discussions go here!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!
I was able to buy a pair of the coveted caliper carrier brackets that are no longer available through GM. Just this week, I'm finally getting around to installing the whole setup. I have run into an interesting problem.
It seems that the adaptor bracket #18016034 is too thick. Both of mine measure out to a thinkness of just about 5/8 inch.
The problem that arrises is that when I bolt the carrier to the bracket, there is not enough clearence for the carrier to slide over the rotor. I measured my rotor thickness and it's about 1.038" thick. Have you seen this problem before. What is the standard thinkness of the adaptor bracket #18016034?
What's interesting is that the caliper itself, loaded with the pads fits over the rotor just fine. Is my bracket just too thick??????
Please let me know.
Thank you,
__________________ '89 Formula.
383 storker in progress.
Okay, here are my measurements that I took today. It seems that our bracket width is the same at 5/8". My exact measure was 6 thousands less, but that is negligible. Our rotor width is also just about the same, the difference is negligible. Mine is about 1 1/25" which is the same as 1.040" as seen in the picture. If our adaptor brackets and rotors are the same there must be a difference in the carriers. What are your measurements in the place where I took my sample on the carrier??? I'm wondering if that is different or the surface where the adaptor bolts to has a different offset.
Andy, I hope you can jump into this also.
I also included pictures of the numbers cast into the carriers. These aren't the GM part #'s, but I'm wondering if your's are the same?????? Let me know, please.
__________________ '89 Formula.
383 storker in progress.
All is O.K. what you have to do is not try to install the bracket and the carrier at the same time.
The proper way is to mount the bracket to the spindle than the rotor will go over the bracket than you can drop the carrier over the rotor down to the bracket.
When your done the bracket will be inside the rotor ( on the back side ) thats the reason you can't bolt the carrier to the bracket and slide it over the rotor.
I believe the problem is one of assembly techique.
1)The adapter bracket must be mounted onto the spindle first.
2) Then the rotor is attached to the spindle.
3) Now attach the caliper carrier to the adapter bracket.
4) Lastly, install the caliper into the caliper carrier.
Tom, the image you posted shows the adapter bracket resting against the rotor. The image I have attached show quite clearly that the adapter bracket rides inside the rotor.
So if you will place the adapter inside of the rotor and reassemble everything. I belive the problem will be solved.
Great shots, Colt. Better than what I had. I'm with Andy and Jerry on this one. I found that out when I put my rear brakes on earlier this week. Rotor will not go on if the caliper carrier is already bolted on. Bracket, then rotor, then carrier....I'd do that.
Ed
Last edited by ebmiller88; 06-27-2002 at 11:07 AM.
Gentlemen, thank you forthe help! Thanks Ed, Jerry, and Andy. I don't know why I didn't realize this myself. I completely understand the assembly process now.
Thanks again.
__________________ '89 Formula.
383 storker in progress.
Okay guys, thanks for solving that problem. Now on to the next. I realized that the brake line banjo bolt from my old iron stock caliper does not fit into the 1LE caliper. Anybody know what size the banjo bolt for the 1LE caliper needs to be????
__________________ '89 Formula.
383 storker in progress.
Interesting Ed. From my research that I did today, a GM dealer told me that the part number for the banjo bolts is 14000404. And I made sure he was looking at the 2 piston 1LE caliper application. I've also determined that the thread for the banjo bolt is an M8 X 1.0 pitch.
Ed, is there anyway you can find the receipt or the wrapper just to verify this part number????
thanks for the part number guys. It seems that the P/N 10286122 for the banjo bolt is correct. Andy, do you think that it is a M8 X 1.0 pitch thread??? None of the chain part stores carry this size. It seems like it's only available through GM. I can't even find anyone on the internet who sells an M8 X 1.0 banjo bolt.
I just put my brackets on the spindles on Monday, and I also thought 137# was way too far up there. I never reached it with my torque wrench. I felt that I was close to stripping out the threads in the spindle so I quit. I put red Loctite on the bolts so I'm sure they'll hold.
the carrier into the bracket is 137 ft lbs which is from behind and very difficult. especially if you ever want to pull the rotor and repack bearings. I think it is rather stupid if you ask me.
either than or the 89 FSM is all wrong, which I suspect because the pictures are all wrong. and I think 89 is the first year of the big brakes.
does anyone have a 92 FSM? that should be correct.
__________________ tighten your 9 bolt posi!
shims for sale.
Originally posted by Larry Burd either than or the 89 FSM is all wrong, which I suspect because the pictures are all wrong. and I think 89 is the first year of the big brakes.
does anyone have a 92 FSM? that should be correct.
I have the 92 manual. I posted the pic out of it earlier, but since I found out it was wrong, I removed it. I guess GM never bothered to correct it.
Last edited by Justins86bird; 07-15-2002 at 04:25 AM.
All of the "GM" service manual images are wrong. That is why I am soon to have a 1LE front, and rear brake upgrade "CD" published. Some members have already seen sample images from the upcoming "CD".
It may sound corny to some of you. But the reason that I went to all the trouble to gather and publish a "CD" with all of the required pictures and info. Is safety!
For example; The mixup with the bolt torque. And Loctite is not to be used. Brake pads installed backwards. "Why can't I get the pin into the brake pads?" Brake pads installed without the anti rattle springs. ETC.
Those of you on this board who know me. Know that the "Safety Thing" is a big deal to me. If someone is going to do a brake conversion. they should have ALL available information which will help them do it Safely.
can you fax me the section from the 92 manual?
and I'll compare it to the 89 manual.
it's called the guided disk brake section.
Andy,
the caliper carrier bolts come pre-loctied from the factory. so that has to be correct. I do question the 137 ft-lbs of torque though, even though I did about 130 ft-lbs. I do not look forward to removing my rotors, or repacking bearings..........
__________________ tighten your 9 bolt posi!
shims for sale.
andy...
the bolts from the caliper carrier to the bracket come pre-loctited. re-read my post above, then look at justins picture. you'll see what I mean.