Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Brake Board
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Brake Board Looking to upgrade or get the most out of what you have stock? All brake discussions go here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-26-2005, 08:15 PM   #1
Member
 
crazynights's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 413
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 383
Transmission: Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: Det. Posi, Superior Axles, 3:73 G

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Vacuum drops alot when hard stopping

When braking fast, let's say stopping last second for a red light, my car's vacuum drops from 18" in drive to around 5-10" and car wants to really stall. Slow braking, a gradual stop..the car is fine. It's got a HT383 and the brake booster is hooked up to outlet in the back of the intake. At idle the car's vacuum is 20" but what would make the vacuum drop that much and make the car wanna stall? Too much pedal travel? The brakes have been completely redone with all new lines, calipers and since I have drums on the back, they also been totally rebuilt. Any ideas? ??
crazynights is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 12:00 AM   #2
TGO Supporter
 
Stekman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,803
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Stekman Send a message via MSN to Stekman
How's the pedal feel? Is stiff/harder than normal? If you have a leak in the diaphram, when you crack the brakes, it would equalize more or less on both sides, causing a vacuum leak, but in turn, it would stiffen the pedal feel.
Stekman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 12:13 PM   #3
Member
 
crazynights's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 413
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 383
Transmission: Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: Det. Posi, Superior Axles, 3:73 G

Classifieds Rating: (1)
The pedal feels normal, not a two feet on the brake pedal, just normal...a nice firm pedal.

Any clue what could cause this?
crazynights is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 08:05 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
MurcoRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 681
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 305TBI - For now...
Transmission: T-5 - For now...
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73 - For now...

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to MurcoRS
Vacuum leak
Check the vacuum check valve on the booster. Blowing through it's hose end, you shouldn't pass any air. Blow through the booster side and you should have no restrictions. Is it an automatic?
MurcoRS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 12:19 PM   #5
Member
 
crazynights's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 413
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 383
Transmission: Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: Det. Posi, Superior Axles, 3:73 G

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I replaced the booster valve. What about that canister on the brake hose? It's for vapors?

Yes it's an auto, I have a T350. The vacuum line from the modulator goes to the holley carb. Checked that for leaks, all seems solid.
crazynights is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2005, 05:38 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
MurcoRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 681
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 305TBI - For now...
Transmission: T-5 - For now...
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73 - For now...

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to MurcoRS
Quote:
Originally posted by crazynights
I replaced the booster valve. What about that canister on the brake hose? It's for vapors?
It is!

Quote:
Originally posted by crazynights
Yes it's an auto, I have a T350. The vacuum line from the modulator goes to the holley carb. Checked that for leaks, all seems solid.
Are you running off a ported vacuum source?
__________________
Gina - 1969-2008
I miss you every day....

My updated CarDomain site!
http://www.cardomain.com/id/murco1989
One-owner 1989 RS, restified in 2003, starting over and rebuilding it later this summer!
MurcoRS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2005, 12:07 PM   #7
Member
 
crazynights's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 413
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 383
Transmission: Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: Det. Posi, Superior Axles, 3:73 G

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Thanks Murco, I read that and put it back on but doesn't make a difference.

The tranny is hooked up to a full time vacuum source.
crazynights is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2005, 03:35 PM   #8
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Sounds to me like you have the order of events confused.

You stomp on the brakes; the gasoline in the carb all sloshes forward, uncovering the jets; it leans out; the engine hates that; the idle speed goes way down; the vacuum drops accordingly. But, since the booster had plenty of vacuum when you first applied the brakes, and that vacuum is trapped, the brakes continue to work fine so you don't really notice any change in them.

Then, you take your foot off the brakes; the deceleration goes away; the gasoline sloshes back rearwards to where it belongs; the engine starts running right again; idle speed goes up; vacuum rises accordingly.

It has nothing to do with vacuum advance, vacuum leaks, modulator hookup, phases of the moon, or any of that.

Everybody's carbed car does that to some extent.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2005, 09:21 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
MurcoRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 681
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 305TBI - For now...
Transmission: T-5 - For now...
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73 - For now...

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to MurcoRS
Quote:
Originally posted by sofakingdom
Sounds to me like you have the order of events confused.

You stomp on the brakes; the gasoline in the carb all sloshes forward, uncovering the jets; it leans out; the engine hates that; the idle speed goes way down; the vacuum drops accordingly. But, since the booster had plenty of vacuum when you first applied the brakes, and that vacuum is trapped, the brakes continue to work fine so you don't really notice any change in them.

Then, you take your foot off the brakes; the deceleration goes away; the gasoline sloshes back rearwards to where it belongs; the engine starts running right again; idle speed goes up; vacuum rises accordingly.
Pretty close and thinking in a different direction, but I disagree.
The vacuum isn't trapped when applying the brakes, it's continually sourced from the engine. When stopping you do lose RPM but gain vacuum, especially in an automatic car. That initial spike of vacuum may make the brakes feel stronger and then disappates as the vacuum stabilizes. If the car has a stock torque converter, especially if it's a lock-up converter, it may drag the engine down below 500 rpm before downshifting on a hard stop and kill the vacuum assist. Another theory?
__________________
Gina - 1969-2008
I miss you every day....

My updated CarDomain site!
http://www.cardomain.com/id/murco1989
One-owner 1989 RS, restified in 2003, starting over and rebuilding it later this summer!
MurcoRS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2005, 09:41 AM   #10
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Quote:
The vacuum isn't trapped
Really.....

My car has a check valve in the vacuum line going to the brake booster, for this exact purpose. The system is designed such that it contains a sufficient reservoir of vacuum (yes, I know that sounds stupid ... a container of nothing) to provide for a couple of applications of the brakes, even after engine vacuum goes away.

Maybe your car is different?

I stand by my diagnosis.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2005, 12:24 PM   #11
Member
 
crazynights's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 413
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 383
Transmission: Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: Det. Posi, Superior Axles, 3:73 G

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Thank you both for the both response.

The TC is a Saturday Night Special from TCI. Approx 2k stall.
crazynights is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2005, 12:26 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
MurcoRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 681
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 305TBI - For now...
Transmission: T-5 - For now...
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73 - For now...

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to MurcoRS
Quote:
Originally posted by sofakingdom
Really.....

My car has a check valve in the vacuum line going to the brake booster, for this exact purpose. The system is designed such that it contains a sufficient reservoir of vacuum (yes, I know that sounds stupid ... a container of nothing) to provide for a couple of applications of the brakes, even after engine vacuum goes away.

Maybe your car is different?

I stand by my diagnosis.
It's there to allow you application of power assist in case of a no vacuum situation. If a naturally-aspirated engine is running there will be vacuum and the check valve doesn't come into play. It is there as a safety measure in case of engine shut-down while driving, allowing typically 2-3 applications with power assist.

How low is the RPM getting during these hard stops?
__________________
Gina - 1969-2008
I miss you every day....

My updated CarDomain site!
http://www.cardomain.com/id/murco1989
One-owner 1989 RS, restified in 2003, starting over and rebuilding it later this summer!
MurcoRS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2005, 11:15 AM   #13
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,441
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Quote:
It's there to allow you application of power assist in case of a no vacuum situation
Right, I believe that's what I said.
Quote:
The system is designed such that it contains a sufficient reservoir of vacuum ... to provide for a couple of applications of the brakes, even after engine vacuum goes away.
In any case, the check valve WILL come into play any time the vacuum drops. It's a CHECK VALVE, which means that any time the vacuum in the intake tract is lower than the vacuum in the booster, vacuum will flow (!) from the intake to the booster; where it will be stored until such time as it is released during brake usage, or until it leaks down, which may take days.

The check valve does not look out at the engine and see whether it's running or not, and decide whether to do its thing accordingly. Rather, ANY time engine vacuum is greater than that stored in the booster, regardless of the reason for the inequality, more vacuum will be supplied to the booster and captured by the check valve. Therefore, whether the engine is "running" or not, under the circumstances at hand, the booster will contain a plentiful supply of vacuum collected during the period of engine operation immediately prior to brake use; thus, when the driver stomps hard on the brakes, he will have full assist regardless of whether the engine subsequently starts running poorly or not. The low-vacuum condition will not cause brake operation to change at that time.

So, as stated before, the "low vacuum during heavy braking" complaint is not caused by the brakes, as such; but rather by engine operation (fuel delivery) being disturbed by the forces applied to the car.

It has nothing to do with the torque converter, unless the transmission's control hydraulics are severely impaired; since the VERY FIRST THING the transmission is supposed to do when the driver touches the brakes, is to release the converter clutch. Under no circumstances should it be possible to slow the car at such a rate with the brakes that the clutch can't release fast enough to avoid affecting engine speed.

I still stand by my original diagnosis; that being a very commonly observed behavior.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2005, 11:15 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Brake Board

Tags
advance, braking, drop, drops, ht383, source, vacuum
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details