Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Car Audio
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Car Audio Car audio related questions and helpful hints for building the best sound system for your car or getting the most out of what you have.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-14-2007, 09:09 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 70

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Kicker vs. Hifonics

Ok, after reading many many individual amp reviews, I'm pretty sure I've narrowed my mind down to two last amps. Either I want to get a Hifonics BXI1606D or a Kicker 2006 ZX1500.1. I know the Kicker has the Hifonics amp beat hands down, yet I'm not sure if the difference is as vast as the money difference is. As mentioned, I'm powering two woofers (700rms/1400peak@2 ohm) so maybe one of these is a better choice for this setup. If anyone has any other amp suggestions, it'd be much appreciated .

Oh, and the woofers are Hifonics Brutus BX15D2 15"
CamaroShifter85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 09:47 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 58

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I am using a hifonics amp for my boys stereo. Its like 14 years old so its "old school". Anyway, you touched on a couple of things. The primary one is "The Law of Diminished Returns" Or is a 1500 dollar amp 800 dollars better than a 700 dollar amp. My guess is that the Hifonics amp will do just fine for your application. I am assuming you will wire series parallel to get a 2 ohm load on the amp since your dual voice coil 2 ohm per coil woofers would give a very difficult load wired parallel. Also as per our other postings, your 2 15's only require 2 cubic feet per woofer in a sealled enclosure. I went to the website and found the specs.

Cub
cub and Matt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 09:58 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 138
Car: 92' firebird
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt POSI 3.73's

Classifieds Rating: (1)
If its either hi-fonics or kicker definetly get kicker hands down. They are a bit more costly but are quality built and built for competitions.

My thereoy is buy a really good amp the first time and you never have to spend money to replace it.

I also want you to consider highly a MTX 1501D or the MTX 81000d
Both amps are amazing amps that I have had the privilage to own. I sold the 1501d to a friend and I regret it.
both amps are rated at 1000rms at 2ohm @12v 1500rms at 1 ohm @14.4v

Do yourself a favor either the kicker or mtx !!!!
redbird92' is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 10:10 PM   #4
Member
 
jmoney843's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 843/910
Posts: 135
Car: 89 Iroc Z
Engine: 350TPI
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to jmoney843 Send a message via MSN to jmoney843 Send a message via Yahoo to jmoney843
I have an older Hiphonics amp, the Brutus 1500.1 mono dclass block that Ill swear by. Ive never used a kicker amp but I do love their subs. So I think either choice will be a good buy.
jmoney843 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 10:12 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 70

Classifieds Rating: (0)
haha, ok, I'll hold that in though as far as the MTX goes. I'll do a bit of researching on it.

As far as the cf issue goes, are you sure it's only 2 cf!!?! I figured most 15" woofers were a minimum of 3 cf, and about average of 3.7 cf. I do know that brands tend to give you a small amount on purpose, as to make sure their product is not going through as much stress as we'd like to put them through, and by giving a lower recommended air space, it's potentially keeping the woofer safer, meaning they don't have to worry about fixing or anything of that nature.
CamaroShifter85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 10:24 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 58

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Well I am not going argue. I do know that if USD or Boston Acoustics or any other reputable/ high end speaker manufacturer recomends a specific volume I abide by it. I am sure lesser manufacturers will do a generic or undersized volume to make their "made in China" sub attractive to people. Here is the website link

http://www.maxxsonics.com/hifonics/p...lSubsSpkrs.pdf
cub and Matt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 10:38 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 70

Classifieds Rating: (0)
haha, agreed xD..

So do you think that this woofer would be.. one of these "China-brands" that you're talking about? I know their amps are close to how good they say the yare (not like boss, pyramid, or legacy or anything of that caliber), but I'm mainly concerned as so I don't blow it out immediately because the statistics lied to me. I'm jsut not sure if their woofers are quite as honest as their amps.
CamaroShifter85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 11:12 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 58

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I am not going to insinuate anything about equipment that i do not own. I know there used to be only 3 U.S. speaker manufacturers. Of course that was in the 90's. My guess is that a lot of the equipment, speakers and electronics are made in china. Again its why I recommend following manufacturer specs. That way if you do smoke the speaker you followed what they spec'd out.
cub and Matt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 04:42 AM   #9
Supreme Member
 
The Project's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of Toronto
Posts: 2,363
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn

Classifieds Rating: (3)
It depends on what you want to do with the system. If you are building an everyday system to cruise around in, I'd recommend buying the latter amp and saving the extra cash for something else. Any amp will melt when abused. Also your EAR will melt when abused. If you feel the other amp is worth the extra $$ then go with that.
__________________


Will race for Scooby Snacks
...beaten ...abused ...enjoyed ...driven


My build - http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/me...ml#post4511979
The Project is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 10:09 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Posts: 589
Car: 72 Fbird. Want another 3rd gen :(
Engine: Poncho 350
Transmission: Turbo 350

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to TheBandit
buy the kicker.. if its a new hifonics dont bother.. spend the extra money now instead of risking the chance of having problems with the hifonics and sending mroe money,, buy the kicker and that thing will last forever and you wont be dissapointed
TheBandit is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 10:09 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Car Audio

Tags
amp, amplifier, amps, brutus, bx15d2, bxi1606d, china, fonics, hifonics, high, kicker, made, mtx, review, woofers
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details