Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-2004, 01:48 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
paulmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Holiday, FL USA
Posts: 774
Car: 1988 Camaro(92 Z28 clone)
Engine: Forged 383, AFR 195 419/430@wheels
Transmission: Monster 700R4 Yank 3600 stall
Axle/Gears: 9in Detroit locker-3.90's,35 spline

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Carb spacer on a Performer RPM Air Gap manifold, is it OK??

Someone told me in a previous post that running a 1 inch 4 hole carb spacer with an RPM Air Gap manifold was not a good idea and isn't recommended. I always thought that the 4 hole spacer was supposed to increase plenum chamber volume, and allow for a better metering signal to the carb. It is also supposed to help produce better low to mid range torque production. However, if it is not a good idea to use this spacer, I can take it off and that will help take some overall height off of my induction system. I am running the Air Gap manifold with the 1 inch spacer, the 14x5 K&N filter with a 1.5 drop base and a K&N substack. Thanks in advance for any replies to this thread, Paul Moore
__________________
From the ashes a fire shall be woken...
A light from the shadow shall spring..
Renewed shall be engine that was broken...
The [383] stroker now shall be king...
paulmoore is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2004, 01:58 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 5,803

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Spacers are funny things. Sometimes they do exactly what you expect them to do. Sometimes the do the opposite. My rule of thumb with spacers is this: put one on and make some runs. If you go faster, keep it. If you go slower, take it back off.
Damon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2004, 02:00 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 896
Car: 86\92 Mutant
Engine: 355CI 430HP
Transmission: T-5 with mods
Axle/Gears: 7.625", Eaton Posi, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb spacer on a Performer RPM Air Gap manifold, is it OK??

Quote:
Originally posted by paulmoore
Someone told me in a previous post that running a 1 inch 4 hole carb spacer with an RPM Air Gap manifold was not a good idea and isn't recommended. I always thought that the 4 hole spacer was supposed to increase plenum chamber volume, and allow for a better metering signal to the carb. It is also supposed to help produce better low to mid range torque production. However, if it is not a good idea to use this spacer, I can take it off and that will help take some overall height off of my induction system. I am running the Air Gap manifold with the 1 inch spacer, the 14x5 K&N filter with a 1.5 drop base and a K&N substack. Thanks in advance for any replies to this thread, Paul Moore
From all the manifold test's that I have read, including David Vizard's books, the only thing to avoid is an OPEN spacer with an RPM manifold ( Airgap or regular ). You will lose Torque ( as expected, but HP also apparently drops..

A 4 hole is fine ( I have been running one for years ) and will give you the benefits as you noted. The main advantage to the 1 inch four hole is that it gives the fuel\air mixture more distance and time to " Turn the corner" before hitting the plenum floor. The upper plenum floor is the big challenge.

An " open " spacer on a Dual Plane manifold often screws up the fuel distribution and tuning effects of the Dual Plane design.

You combo is good.
Chickenman35 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2004, 02:02 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 896
Car: 86\92 Mutant
Engine: 355CI 430HP
Transmission: T-5 with mods
Axle/Gears: 7.625", Eaton Posi, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Damon
Spacers are funny things. Sometimes they do exactly what you expect them to do. Sometimes the do the opposite. My rule of thumb with spacers is this: put one on and make some runs. If you go faster, keep it. If you go slower, take it back off.
Elegant and simple...good advice.
Chickenman35 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2004, 02:02 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors

Tags
383, advantage, air, airgap, carb, carburetor, do, gap, inch, kn, loses, manifold, performer, rpm, spacer, spacers, substack, torque
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details