Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-24-2005, 01:12 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Tripper511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 264
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 4 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
What does cfm mean? What size should I Get?

I'm in the middle of a getting a new 350 put in my car. In the mean time I'm using the old carb from my 305 but I want to get a new carb in the near future. <p>I know that the carb I have is a 4 barrel but that's it. I was wondering what size carb I should get for my 350 and what does cfm stand for. Thanks!
__________________
"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything" -Alexander Hamilton
"He who knows others is learned. He who knows himself is wise" - Lao Tse
Tripper511 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2005, 01:18 PM   #2
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,562
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
"Cubic Feet per Minute". It's a measure of how much air flow capacity a carb has.

However, the measurement isn't standardized. The vacuum below the carb base can be varied, and that affects how much air will flow through it. Most 4bbls use the same standard, though.

The formula for getting the minimum sized 4bbl carb is to multiply engine displacement by maximum RPMs you will run, divided by 3456 (an easy number to remember). A 350 spinning to 5500 RPMs will need at least a 557 CFM carb. So, go bigger than that. 650 CFM usally will yield good results on a 350.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2005, 01:57 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Tripper511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 264
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 4 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
If I was to get a larger one, like a 750 would it cause any damage or just guzzel gas?
Tripper511 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2005, 02:08 PM   #4
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,562
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
No damage. It won't necessarily guzzle gas. However, economy and driveability are typically improved when the carb is closer to the minimum size required. Performance improvement with a larger carb is measureable, say 750 vs. 650, but typically not felt (assuming both are properly tuned).
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2005, 08:05 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Severn, MD.
Posts: 1,301
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to NastyL98_T/A
650 will be plenty. I've got a 650DP on my 383. Broke it in on the dyno tonight, gonna make some load pulls tomorrow. I'll let you know what it does. Last motor we put together made 470 with a 650 and the one before that made 515. Both had the shafts milled down and the choke horns milled off and a little port work. We stuck the smaller of the two on the flow bench and it flowed like 720. Mines stock though, so it's still around 650.
NastyL98_T/A is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 10:48 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Tripper511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 264
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 4 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I was reading the article How to Choose the Proper Carburetor and Fuel Pump and it said that if you have a healthy 350 you should run at least a 750 cfm. The article went on to say that if you have manual transmission that you should consider a mechanical carb instead of a vacum. Any thoughts on that?
Tripper511 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:35 AM   #7
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,562
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Mechanical secondaries are, in my opinion, superior on all counts in a performance application. The manual transmission factor makes that even more so. Going mechanical secondaries also means you need to avoid over-carbureting, which is simply choosing the carb size based on engine size and lowest RPMs at which you would go wide open throttle. The Holley website has a chart to help with that.

Unless you have a huge cam and high numberical ratio rear end gears, you aren't likely to need a 750 CFM mechanical secondary carb on a 350. The 650 is much more likely to produce satisfaction.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2005, 11:35 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors

Tags
2000, 350, 750, carb, carbs, carburation, carburetor, cfm, engine, mean, mild, put, size, stand, stock, terms
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details