Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-23-2007, 12:23 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
D3ATH)(TR00P3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 51
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Carb Vs TPI

Im getting a "new" engine pretty soon, right now i have 2 choices. a 350 TPI , and a 350 carb, i can get more info later, but im thinking about swiching to carb because i will be doing a lot of upgrades, and it seems like losing the computer will simplify things.
any ideas on what i should do? (305 tbi now)
D3ATH)(TR00P3R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 12:44 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 12,946
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Send a message via AIM to xpndbl3
Re: Carb Vs TPI

daily driver TPI is nice, weekend fun car only that will have a more radical cam then carbs make more power, but will cost fuel economy.
xpndbl3 is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 01:17 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 343
Car: 83 Trans Am
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: 5 Speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt till it breaks

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

I agree, for a daily driver the TPI would be the better choice, but the way it sounds this is a fun car and not needed for everyday driving, in that case I'd definitely go with the carb setup. And if you want to drive it alot then I'd go with a economical carb like a non cc q-jet, which can make great power and yet still provide fairly decent mileage. I had a eddy 600 and actually removed it to put on a balanced and rejetted q-jet, and not only does it get better mileage but it actually makes the engine run better and with more power. I love my non cc q-jet. When taken care of and tuned properly they are nearly impossible to beat. If your lookin for max power with no worry about mileage then look at carbs like Holley, or BG. I like the Demon carbs too, cause the venturi's are changable. The BG's are great carbs if you talk to some and junk if you talk to others, seems nobody can make up their mind.
__________________

1983 Trans Am LG4 305, T5 w/3.73 gears; LT1 VERY soon....oh yeah
FS:mildly modded 67 chevy 283 engine, 15X8.5 Torq Thrust D (set of 2)

Last edited by hgffrank; 07-23-2007 at 01:35 PM.
hgffrank is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 08:21 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 48
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

I vote go for carb unless gas mileage is a real concern. I wouldnt worry about driving a carbed car every day though. My T/A is my dd and its carbed. Ive never had any issues. Even in the dead of winter(can get pretty damn cold here in KS).
Acid Phreak is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 11:54 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
D3ATH)(TR00P3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 51
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

Thanks for the feedback. Alot of good points have been made. Probably going to go carb. but still not sure.
D3ATH)(TR00P3R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2007, 02:35 PM   #6
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,550
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
I'm more in the camp of "run what you've got". With rare sweetheart deal exceptions, it's not cost effective to switch from one system to another. If you're purpose-building (such as a car for the track), then that's a different story, too.

If you can get a complete 350 TPI engine and system for a decent price, swapping that in place of a 305 TBI isn't too difficult. If you have to piece together the TPI system, then you're better off sticking with TBI and upgrading it. If you're getting a 350 with a complete TPI system, it makes more sense to me to swap that system in than it does to convert the engine to carb.

You were pretty sparing with details, such as if you're getting a 350 and are trying to figure out whether to put a TPI or carb on it; or if you are looking at two different engines, one with TPI and the other with carb; how complete each is; what year model each is; and what your immediate and long-term goals are with the car.

Personally, I don't find computerless systems much less complicated than those with computers. It's more a matter of understanding what each does and how it does it.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 12:07 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
D3ATH)(TR00P3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 51
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

true, my details were lacking, The tpi is no longer avalible to me, so im going to carb. The engine is out of a chevy van. im guessing late 80s early 90s. It has a quadrajet carb. Plan on getting higher flowing intake manifold and edelbrock carb, headers ect.
The cost of the 350 is $200 and it is a strong runner(not to high of miles).
Im really getting it out of necessity, the 305 i have in my car has 223,xxx miles on it. I figure the block should be a good platform to upgrade as time goes on
D3ATH)(TR00P3R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 12:35 PM   #8
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,550
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Truck engines didn't get the best pieces when it comes to passenger car performance. Most likely, it's got poor flowing torque heads - fine for what the factory does with it, not so good for trying to get more out of it.

I have no love lost for Edelbrock carbs. If you don't have a carb and want something that runs and gets you from point A to point B for the least amount of money, then they're fine. But, to spend money on one when you've got a functioning q-jet makes no sense - you're trading Carb Type A-A for Carb Type A-B; there simply is no advantage to an Edelbrock over a q-jet, there are disadvantages such as reduced fuel economy and power potential, so why spend money on something that will hurt you and won't help you? Seriously, stop yourself before you make an expensive mistake.

If the q-jet is computer controlled, then never mind - getting it to run in a TBI car is more trouble than it's worth. I still wouldn't go with an Edelbrock, though. A very good case could be made for sticking with TBI.

The van 350 block is a decent base for future expansion. It probably has 4-bolt mains (although that doesn't mean a lot), if '86 or '87 it will have one-piece rear main seal (better than 2-piece, IMHO). If '87 it will be a roller lifter cam casting, but probably isn't machined for the roller pieces. If '88-later, it would have been TBI.

Kind of hard to go wrong for $200, as long as there aren't any cracks in the block.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 01:03 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
D3ATH)(TR00P3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 51
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

Thanks for the carb info. Ill keep that one in. also it isnt computer controlled
D3ATH)(TR00P3R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 03:32 PM   #10
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,550
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
U.S. light trucks/vans should have gotten computer controls by 1985, certainly 1986 model year. The engine may be older than you think (or at least the van is), or somebody has done some modifications from factory.

Not a big deal, but could affect some of the details of the swap.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 05:50 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 343
Car: 83 Trans Am
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: 5 Speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt till it breaks

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

I agree 100% that edelbrock carbs are a waste of money, I had one and actually got rid of it and now use a q-jet with much better results. Gotta love the small primaries for decent mileage and massive secondaries for power. I think the q-jet was an excellent design and I would take it over many of the aftermarket carbs. Just gotta get one thats not computer controlled.
hgffrank is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 08:42 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,171
Car: 1990 IROCZ Camaro
Engine: 350 4bbl, 200cc Heads, 270hr Cam
Transmission: 700R4 w/ Trans-Go shift kit.
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt Posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

Also take into account your emission laws in your state. A carb motor will put out more emissions and be harder to pass at the station. Granted, you can lean it out a considerable amount, and this may or may not work for you.
GuitarJunki17 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 12:22 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
D3ATH)(TR00P3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 51
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

No i was wrong, it is computer controlled. so im not sure on what to do about a carb. Can i make it not computer controlled? or i guess i have to find one thats not computer controlled, (dang this is a lot more complicated than i thought it would be LOL)
as for the emissions, not something im worried about, no cat.
BTW- the edelbroc that i was looking at was a 600cfm non-emission electric choke. if i cant get a quadrajet
D3ATH)(TR00P3R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 12:29 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
D3ATH)(TR00P3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 51
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

OR... can i switch the 350 carb into TBI ( off the 305). Because then i wouldnt have to worry about my fuel pressure, nor change/ remove my computer. If i sound like a complete idiot for saying this its because i dont really know a lot bout this stuff. if i can do this it would save me some money.
D3ATH)(TR00P3R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 12:42 PM   #15
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,550
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Actually, I believe I already recommended that (keeping what you've got).

The TBI forum has a lot of information about getting LO3 TBI to work on a 350.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 08:35 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 343
Car: 83 Trans Am
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: 5 Speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt till it breaks

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
Actually, I believe I already recommended that (keeping what you've got).

The TBI forum has a lot of information about getting LO3 TBI to work on a 350.
I've always heard the only big difference between 305 and 350 tbi is the injectors are bigger with the 350's, and even tho the computer programming is a bit different, the 350 can run fine with the 305 computer as long as its basically stock.

I have used 305 tbi on a 350 before and never had a problem, and that was before I even knew there was a difference.
hgffrank is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:04 AM   #17
Junior Member
 
D3ATH)(TR00P3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 51
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
Actually, I believe I already recommended that (keeping what you've got).

The TBI forum has a lot of information about getting LO3 TBI to work on a 350.
Duh.. sorry. I think that might be a decent idea for now, but would i make more power with the carb or my stock tbi unit, Im guessing the carb because my tbi is meant for a smaller displacement engine.( maybe, thats just my uneducated guess). If i could put a tpi unit on there that would be cool, but my fuel pressure isnt high enough( I think tbi has 9-12psi maybe, where as TPI has somewhere like 40+psi) plus i think i might have to change my comp.
Its funny how something that starts so simple turns into a dang novel lol.
D3ATH)(TR00P3R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 12:32 PM   #18
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,550
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Carb will probably make slightly more power. Properly tuned, TBI will offer better fuel economy and driveability for the power. If you stick with TBI, the first thing you should do is get a 350 throttle body. Plentiful in junkyards. The second thing is to reprogram the PROM.

Switching to TPI would require changing the computer and all of the harnessing from the computer to the engine. It's best done getting all the parts from a complete TPI car. The in-tank electric fuel pump most likely will also need to be changed. It's the regulator that determines pressure, but the TBI pump from the factory isn't adequate to feed TPI (however, a TPI pump works fine for TBI).

TBI is the red-headed step child of the performance world. Not because it's a bad thing, but because the factory never optimized it on performance applications (we won't count crossfire), and the aftermarket didn't pick up the ball. However, Holley and others have stand-alone EFI systems that are basically 4-bbl TBI, so the concept itself isn't the issue.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2007, 11:45 AM   #19
Junior Member
 
D3ATH)(TR00P3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 51
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Carb Vs TPI

Looks like carb is my best bet. Thanks for all the input! Learned a ton just from this.
D3ATH)(TR00P3R is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2007, 11:45 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details