Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-09-2009, 01:42 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 162
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Summit Intake Manifold vs. EdlebrocK

So I am planning on building a 383 stroker and I am just glancing at parts here and there...I see that Summit has a fairly new line of intake manifolds that are labeled stage 1-3 and you can get a stage 3 for under 200 bucks

I was originally planning on getting and Edlebrock Air Gap intake manifold

The summit is cheaper though money is not the biggest issue was just wondering if the edlebrock was worth the extra 50 bucks over the stage 3 summit?
__________________
1991 Camaro RS 3.1L V6...stock
Twitch RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 03:28 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 35

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit Intake Manifold vs. EdlebrocK

No you need to get vtec for your engine first.... Jk read the different specs on each manifold to look for possible ups and downs, i.e. weight, what rpm range each one is rated for, and what kind of headers you can use with each one, then make your decision. And you can always go for flashy show and get namebrand parts with logo's and different finishes, so its really all up to what you are looking to get out of your engine.

Last edited by five7kid; 04-09-2009 at 10:06 PM. Reason: Language
86rsproject is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 06:49 AM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 5,803

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit Intake Manifold vs. EdlebrocK

All Summit SBC intakes are Weiand intakes with Summit's logo stamped into them instead of Weiand's. The stage 2 and 3 are all the latest computer flow modeled generation II Stealth intakes. Weiand's direct competitor to the Edlebrock RPM/AirGap series, and probably every bit their equal. This is one place it's safe to save a few bucks without giving up performance.
Damon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 02:08 AM   #4
Member
 
Quasi-Traction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Vancouver, WA/Portland, Orey-gun
Posts: 117
Car: 1986 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 4 bolt 355ci
Transmission: Borg Warner T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi Disc Rear

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Summit Intake Manifold vs. EdlebrocK

I have the "professional" products" Air-gap equivilant on my 355.

I had a lot of trouble getting one of the coolent passages to seal completely with several different pipe plugs/teflon tape.

Just be aware that some of the places that are threaded or machined surfaces on the Edelbrock might not be up to the same QC standards a Weiand or Edelbrock on one of the "off" brand intakes. Might also be some casting flash on it too.

Other than that my intake is satisfactory.
__________________
Quasi-Traction is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 07:18 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 549
Car: 1991 Pontiac GTA
Engine: L98 TPI 350
Transmission: 700R4 built by Gregs in Albuquerque
Axle/Gears: Factory 3.23 10-Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Summit Intake Manifold vs. EdlebrocK

Chevy High Performance did a manifold flog which included the RPM Airgap and the Summit Stage 3 and what it came down to be is that, yes the RPM Airgap did make more power but it was a negligable 2 peak hp and 3 average. Now something to add in when your figuring this is that the Airgap was made with the vacuum port VERY close to the carb...because when they tested it they used thier own carbs and it works fine...but not so much on a 4150. Now Im not saying its impossible just that its a tight deal. The Summit manifold is not that way, it will not give you a fitment issue in any way.
F-Body Demon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 08:50 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
sgreen3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 57
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 355ci
Transmission: WC T-5 (untill it breaks)
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: Summit Intake Manifold vs. EdlebrocK

You might also look into Professional Products, intakes I have one of there Crosswind maifolds, witch is like an Air-Gap, And it works very well. And i got it for 149.99 brand new.
sgreen3 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 08:50 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors

Tags
air, brand, finishes, gap, intake, makes, manifold, manifolds, problem, sbc, stage, stage2, summit, summitintake, summits, weiand
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details