Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2009, 07:37 PM   #1
Member
 
cprepared125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: springfield OR
Posts: 123
Car: 85 Z28 scca C Prepared
Engine: 5.7 348 RWHP
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: dana 44 3.41

Classifieds Rating: (0)
4160 vs edelbrock

just contemplating which one to go with. i have a mild built 350 and have both a 600 cfm 4160 and a 600 cfm edelbrock on hand. previously ran the edelbrock but lookin to see if the holley would make any more power. Any ideas
cprepared125 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 07:47 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houson
Posts: 290
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 355 SBC
Transmission: 700 R4 TCI
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

Holley, easier to tune and modify and always made more power. The Edelbrock is mostly just a carter repop.
mmadden55 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 07:58 PM   #3
Member
 
cprepared125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: springfield OR
Posts: 123
Car: 85 Z28 scca C Prepared
Engine: 5.7 348 RWHP
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: dana 44 3.41

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

ya the edelbrock did seem like junk i only ask because i was so blown away by the performance of my demon i put on my racecar it kinda leaned me towards holleys. I just don't know much about the 4160's.
cprepared125 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 07:59 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
chrispy383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Newark Valley, NY 13811
Posts: 23
Car: 92 rs 25th ann.
Engine: 383
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 342

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

You can tune a Holley for more HP but prepare to tune alot and rebuild alot. With an Edelbrock you can upgrade for cheap and easy and no muss no fuss with the tuning.
chrispy383 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 08:03 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houson
Posts: 290
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 355 SBC
Transmission: 700 R4 TCI
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

The Demon is a good carb but it is basically a Holley Clone. The 4160 is a great street carb. I threw one on my 73 Satelite 400 mopar big block straight out of the box and it ran great till I sold the car 10 years later. Never touched it except to set the float level and the idle. I recomend them highly.
mmadden55 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 08:05 PM   #6
Member
 
cprepared125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: springfield OR
Posts: 123
Car: 85 Z28 scca C Prepared
Engine: 5.7 348 RWHP
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: dana 44 3.41

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

ya i can relate to that my demon needs to be tuned just about every two races but to me it's worth it but it also seems with the edelbrock i was never able to really get it tuned right either
cprepared125 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 08:08 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houson
Posts: 290
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 355 SBC
Transmission: 700 R4 TCI
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

Wow shouldn't need that much tuning. For the 4160 I would recommend getting the Holley manual. Once you get it set up, right jets power valve etc float level, which is easy to do, you shouldn't need to touch it again.
mmadden55 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 08:58 PM   #8
Member
 
cprepared125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: springfield OR
Posts: 123
Car: 85 Z28 scca C Prepared
Engine: 5.7 348 RWHP
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: dana 44 3.41

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

well i'm exaggerating a little bit we we race at a lot of different elevations so some tuning is inevitable. Does anyone have an idea for a good starting point
cprepared125 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 03:40 AM   #9
Junior Member
 
Cg-OneSic89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 58
Car: 1984 Z28 L69
Engine: Cammed 350
Transmission: Tremec Tr-3550
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

What intake and what cam is in the motor? My 670 Truck avenger on top of my 350 (standard bore, world s/r heads, torker 2 intake, crane 228 cam) Likes 72/78 jets with a 35 squirter. Yours probably has a 28 on it which may work as well.
Cg-OneSic89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 06:39 AM   #10
Member
 
cprepared125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: springfield OR
Posts: 123
Car: 85 Z28 scca C Prepared
Engine: 5.7 348 RWHP
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: dana 44 3.41

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

350 (.488 lift int/exh 292/292 adv duration) cam. as of now has a performer eps intake but i may change it
cprepared125 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 09:25 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Cg-OneSic89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 58
Car: 1984 Z28 L69
Engine: Cammed 350
Transmission: Tremec Tr-3550
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

That cam is pretty close to mine (480/480 286/286, but im running 1.6 rockers so its now 515/515). Modest dual planes like your eps wont need much fuel, but im personally not sure about the need for more jet with a 600 vs a 670. Does your 600 have an adjustable vac secondary? If not i would reccomend one, my truck avengers stock spring isnt cutting it when i slam it down, so i got more springs on the way. As Far as a starting point, 70/72 primaries is a good starting point. Jet up 4-6 sizes on the secondaries, then tune via the sticky.

Best of luck
Cg-OneSic89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 03:01 PM   #12
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,540
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
What will you be using this car for? Need more details, such as transmission, stall if auto, gears, etc.

That's a lot of cam for a street car, and too much for the intake. Assuming you spin the motor to 6500 RPMs, not only is the intake going to hold you back, both of those carbs are also too small.

So, my first response to your original question is "neither". But, if you insist on using one of them, I'd say go with the Holley. Then, the first thing you do is convert it to 4150 so you can rejet the secondaries. The second thing is to get the Quick Fuel adjustable secondary housing - don't waste your time with springs, the method the adjustable housing uses is the only right way to tune a vacuum secondary Holley.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 03:52 PM   #13
Member
 
cprepared125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: springfield OR
Posts: 123
Car: 85 Z28 scca C Prepared
Engine: 5.7 348 RWHP
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: dana 44 3.41

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

I just want a fun street car i can take to the track if i want.... but probably never will cause thats what my third gen is for. i'm runnin a 5 speed 3.73 gears. I planned on using a little better intake but right now i'm just workin with what i got. I'm probably only planning on turnin 5000 rpm anyway after all it is just a gm crate 350 with stock heads even.
I did see the 4150 secondary metering block kit in summit and was planning on going that route
cprepared125 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 12:13 AM   #14
Junior Member
 
Cg-OneSic89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 58
Car: 1984 Z28 L69
Engine: Cammed 350
Transmission: Tremec Tr-3550
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 4160 vs edelbrock

Learn new things everyday, my truck avenger has jets in the secondaries. Thanks five7kid for pointing out a better option, im working with what i already have (quick change secondary spring housing). By the time you do all the work to the carb though, you can get a 4150 thats been rebuilt by holley for just a little more. Hell, we have a guy that runs a summit mechanical secondary carb here in town with excellent feedback on it. The one thing i like is no gaskets below the fuel level. Just some food for thought.

Last edited by Cg-OneSic89; 10-20-2009 at 12:43 AM.
Cg-OneSic89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 12:13 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors

Tags
292292, 3550, adjustable, cam, carbs, convert, edelbrock, holley, mechanical, mopar, secondary, secondarys, summit, tr, tremec
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details