Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-07-2010, 09:40 PM   #1
Supreme Member
 
L695speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Andover, NJ
Posts: 1,002
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: L69 aka 305 HO
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Ditch the CCC carb for a pre CCC carb

I'm seriously considering the idea of ditching my ccc carb from the L69 for a pre ccc one. I'm looking at Q jets from Pontiacs and Chevys and etc. Question number 1. Will a Q jet from a Pontiac 400 fit on a 87 LG4 manifold? I know all Q jets used the same basic casting so I'd imagine it would.

2. My car stalls out after the warm up idle, after the warm up of around 2,000 RPMs it will drop to curb idle and stall out after a second or two. I'm thinking of chasing down the idle screw near the throttle cables or the vac leak but if neither one fixes the issue then I'm considering going old school. If I do go old school can I keep my electrical HEI distributor or will I have to to to a vac advance HEI distributor? If I do need to go to a vac advance, which one will work in the 87 LG4?

Finally, what I'm gonna do is check my manifold for leaks there, then replace a bunch of vac lines, and mess with the screw. But if all that doesn't work I'm just about out of things to try hence the idea of going pre ccc carb. If I do go pre CCC carb am I correctly assuming I can ditch all the emissions stuff? (charcoal canister, AIR, O2, blah blah blah). Thanks in advance guys. Sorry if some of this stuff seems repetitive. I'm jumping among a whole bunch of cars and some of the old symptoms got thrown out the window, so I'm not dealing with a high idle but rather a car that will not idle but runs strong at part throttle. The high idle was a warm up as Five7Kid and a few others told me earlier.
L695speed is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 11:32 PM   #2
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,557
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
This is not a good move. There is nothing a non-CC q-jet can do that a CC q-jet can't do when given the chance to operate as designed.

Fix what's wrong with what you have.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2010, 09:09 AM   #3
Supreme Member
 
L695speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Andover, NJ
Posts: 1,002
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: L69 aka 305 HO
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Ditch the CCC carb for a pre CCC carb

Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
This is not a good move. There is nothing a non-CC q-jet can do that a CC q-jet can't do when given the chance to operate as designed.

Fix what's wrong with what you have.
So you would go ahead and take apart the intake to check for leaks there, mess with the screw, and look for any more leaks? I know it might be overkill to do what I posted about but the thing is I don't know if the main screws have been messed with. If they have as I may have said I don't have the equipment to set it right. I doubt my timing is an issue because it runs ok in the warm up cycle, and as far as I can tell it runs strong and is very responsive to any throttle you give it.
L695speed is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2010, 01:56 PM   #4
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,557
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
If it's anything outside of the carb, you could replace the carb and still have the same problem.

If the problem is with the carb itself, it wouldn't be that expensive to find a professionally rebuild CC q-jet, compared to what it would take to go non-CC.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2010, 07:59 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Ditch the CCC carb for a pre CCC carb

Quote:
Originally Posted by L695speed View Post
I'm seriously considering the idea of ditching my ccc carb from the L69 for a pre ccc one. I'm looking at Q jets from Pontiacs and Chevys and etc. Question number 1. Will a Q jet from a Pontiac 400 fit on a 87 LG4 manifold? I know all Q jets used the same basic casting so I'd imagine it would.
Yes, but you'll need to get a bracket to relocate the TV cable
mount. Look for a q-jet from a Chevy engine, and take the pump to carb steel line too, the you won't be tempted to use a rubber line on the pressure side of the pump (not all Q jets have the fuel line inlet in the same location, so the stock line probably won't work).

Quote:
Originally Posted by L695speed View Post
2. My car stalls out after the warm up idle, after the warm up of around 2,000 RPMs it will drop to curb idle and stall out after a second or two. I'm thinking of chasing down the idle screw near the throttle cables or the vac leak but if neither one fixes the issue then I'm considering going old school. If I do go old school can I keep my electrical HEI distributor or will I have to to to a vac advance HEI distributor? If I do need to go to a vac advance, which one will work in the 87 LG4?
You'll need a vacuum advance HEI, and that is another reason to take a q-jet from a chevy engine, you can use the distributor from that engine too (BBC or SBC).

Quote:
Originally Posted by L695speed View Post
Finally, what I'm gonna do is check my manifold for leaks there, then replace a bunch of vac lines, and mess with the screw. But if all that doesn't work I'm just about out of things to try hence the idea of going pre ccc carb. If I do go pre CCC carb am I correctly assuming I can ditch all the emissions stuff? (charcoal canister, AIR, O2, blah blah blah). Thanks in advance guys. Sorry if some of this stuff seems repetitive. I'm jumping among a whole bunch of cars and some of the old symptoms got thrown out the window, so I'm not dealing with a high idle but rather a car that will not idle but runs strong at part throttle. The high idle was a warm up as Five7Kid and a few others told me earlier.
Yeah you can ditch the emissions stuff, but you can do that and still keep the CC stuff anyways (not legally though...).
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2010, 08:33 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
L695speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Andover, NJ
Posts: 1,002
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: L69 aka 305 HO
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Ditch the CCC carb for a pre CCC carb

Bethany who is on here and on Earlythirdgen.com said she wasn't sure but it could be the TPS sensor going bad. Considering the fact that I've rebuilt or replaced just about everything ignition and starter wise that was actually not a bad idea. I mean if my distributor had bad corrosion on all its parts no doubt the carb could have the same problem with its electrical points. After all it did sit on a shelf in an ordinary garage (not climate controlled) for five years, as did all the other electrical parts. I'm not ruling out switching to a Non CC carb but 57kid did have a good point, if the problem is not in the carb then switching carbs is not going to fix it.

Does anyone know where I can find all the sensors for the carb? If I am going to change sensors I'm going to go ahead and rebuild it too.
L695speed is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2010, 08:38 PM   #7
Supreme Member
 
L695speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Andover, NJ
Posts: 1,002
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: L69 aka 305 HO
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Ditch the CCC carb for a pre CCC carb

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregsz-28 View Post
Yeah you can ditch the emissions stuff, but you can do that and still keep the CC stuff anyways (not legally though...).
I have it registered as a Historic here in NJ, with historic cars in theory they are not your daily driver (yes its not my daily driver so I'm not breaking the law there, I have a Subaru Outback for the daily grind). If they don't get driven everyday and are over 25 years old they are exempt from inspection. Doesn't mean that the police won't pull you over if you have a busted windshield. So technically because its registered as a historic I'm not breaking any state laws. However, because the emissions is federally mandated, yea its not legal. Also mileage is dependent on your insurance policy.
L695speed is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2010, 09:18 PM   #8
JT
Administrator|Webmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,788

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Ditch the CCC carb for a pre CCC carb

The TPS is fairly easy to troubleshoot if you have an analog multimeter. By probing the TPS with an analog multimeter and running the throttle through ranges from idle to WOT, you should see smooth movement on the analog multimeter. Any jumps or breaks shown on the analog multimeter, with a good connection to the TPS, would indicate the TPS is faulty.

Quote:
Originally Posted by L695speed View Post
Bethany who is on here and on Earlythirdgen.com said she wasn't sure but it could be the TPS sensor going bad. Considering the fact that I've rebuilt or replaced just about everything ignition and starter wise that was actually not a bad idea. I mean if my distributor had bad corrosion on all its parts no doubt the carb could have the same problem with its electrical points. After all it did sit on a shelf in an ordinary garage (not climate controlled) for five years, as did all the other electrical parts. I'm not ruling out switching to a Non CC carb but 57kid did have a good point, if the problem is not in the carb then switching carbs is not going to fix it.

Does anyone know where I can find all the sensors for the carb? If I am going to change sensors I'm going to go ahead and rebuild it too.
JT is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2010, 10:04 PM   #9
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Ditch the CCC carb for a pre CCC carb

Quote:
Originally Posted by L695speed View Post
I have it registered as a Historic here in NJ, with historic cars in theory they are not your daily driver (yes its not my daily driver so I'm not breaking the law there, I have a Subaru Outback for the daily grind). If they don't get driven everyday and are over 25 years old they are exempt from inspection. Doesn't mean that the police won't pull you over if you have a busted windshield. So technically because its registered as a historic I'm not breaking any state laws. However, because the emissions is federally mandated, yea its not legal. Also mileage is dependent on your insurance policy.
I understand, I don't have any emissions stuff either, since my Camaro isn't my DD, it turned 25 years old last week, and there are no inspections in my county. I assumed you'd know, I just don't want to accidentally give illegal advice to an unknowing person one day.
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2010, 10:45 AM   #10
Supreme Member
 
L695speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Andover, NJ
Posts: 1,002
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: L69 aka 305 HO
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Ditch the CCC carb for a pre CCC carb

Quote:
Originally Posted by JT View Post
The TPS is fairly easy to troubleshoot if you have an analog multimeter. By probing the TPS with an analog multimeter and running the throttle through ranges from idle to WOT, you should see smooth movement on the analog multimeter. Any jumps or breaks shown on the analog multimeter, with a good connection to the TPS, would indicate the TPS is faulty.
Which of the four points do you put the probes in? And I'm assuming that you need to have it disconnected from the wiring harness to do that.
L695speed is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 02:53 PM   #11
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,557
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
B and C (center and bottom).

You can either probe the wires (done with ignition on and checking for voltage), or disconnected (checking for resistance).
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 02:53 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors

Tags
carb, carburetor, carburetors, cc, ccc, change, chevys, choke, l69, leakage, mean, qjet, replace, tps, whats
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details