Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-22-2001, 09:30 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NC age: 24 occupation: body piercer
Posts: 99
Car: 87 Trans Am
Engine: 5 point slow LG4
Transmission: Auto

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to menace88SC
square bore vs. spread bore????

i have made the decision to ditch my computer in favor of a straight up carb setup. i currently have the LG4 motor in my trans am with a computer controlled carb. seeing as how this will have to be replaced with a non computer controlled carb, i need to know what the difference is between spread bore and square bore carbs is. i have been told that an eldebrock q-jet is a direct bolt on to my factory manifold, but i have seen them in both spread and square bore. what do i need for my application. i am trying to keep cost as low as possible b/c within the next year or so i will be swapping out to a blown 383 stroker. any help or suggestions are greatly appreciated.

peace,
menace
__________________
Lady Justice wears a blindfold & carries a sword. And when blind people take up fencing, the innocent are bound to get hurt!
menace88SC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2001, 03:37 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,462
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
A "square" carb has all 4 bores about the same size. A "spreadbore" one has much smaller primary bores and much larger secondaries. Generally, the spreadbore design compromises power in exchange for better gas mileage and driveablity, although if the carb is well-tuned, there isn't necessarily much sacrifice.

There is no such thing as a square-flange Quadra-Jet (a product and tradename of the Rochester Prod. Div. of GM), whether it has been worked over by Edelbrock or not. So if you intend to use a Q-Jet, you will need a manifold with the spread-bore pattern. Your factory intake is spreadbore. Any other Q-Jet is a direct bolt-up to that intake, as far as that goes; but then you have to deal with the issue of computer-controlled vs. non-CC. It's an all or nothing proposition: if you put a non-CC carb on there, you will also need a non-CC distributor, and if your car is an automatic, you'll need some method of locking up the torque converter since that's another thing the computer handles.
__________________
"So many Mustangs, so little time..."
RB83L69 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2001, 10:24 AM   #3
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,564
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
You are confusing the Edelbrock Performer series of carbs, which are square bore and won't bolt directly to a stock manifold, and the Edelbrock q-jet series, one of which happens to be called a Performer q-jet.

If you truly are wanting to keep costs down, your best bet is to stay with the CC q-jet you have now. There isn't anything out there (other than unknown-history used stuff) that won't cost you a few hundred dollars. The Edelbrock q-jets are about the most expensive thing out there, and like RB said, you need to replace the distributor and provide for TCC lockup as well no matter how you go about eliminating the CC carb. For operating effeciency, you can't beat the CC system.

Save the induction changes for the new engine. If you hadn't said "blown 383", I would even say keep the CC q-jet for the 383.
__________________
See detail on my cars in My vBGarage

I'm a racing fool. Not necessarily in that order.

Last edited by five7kid; 12-24-2001 at 10:28 AM.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2001, 10:24 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors

Tags
bore, carburetor, eldebrock, gas, intake, jet, manifold, mileage, performer, put, spread, spreadbore, square, squarebore, thirdgen
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details