ConvertiblesDiscussed here are problems and solutions to convertible specific questions, including difficult to find part numbers and other convertible tech help.
Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!
I think I remember reading somewhere, it's because the verts are heavier. I have also read some people regret the sportlines because they drop the car too low. Which makes sense if a vert is heavier then the springs may bottom out easier. I could be wrong here so don't take my word as the only reason.
I had a pro kit on my last vert and the sportlines on my gta. The prokit is the way to go. Excellent stance and no sacrifice to ride quality!
__________________ Scott
89 Formula LB9/M5 T-top (Black on Black)
92 Camaro Z28 Convertible (Purple on Tan)
87 Monte Carlo SS Turbo6 (Black on Black)
86 Regal T-Type (White on Tan)
Look in your rear fender wells. The space is reduced due to creating the area where the convertible top folds down into. All manufactures "exclude" the convertible model, but I have had no problems running lowering springs.
To be honest, the sportlines did not drop it enough for my taste, so I went with Intrax springs.
I have the sportlines on my vert, I have had no problems what so ever. And, I actually enjoy the ride charachteristics myselfs. Plus my wasted *** chassis flexes so much that it just absorbs the roughness.
