Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DFI and ECM

DFI and ECM Discuss all aspects of DFI (Digital Fuel Injection), ECMs (Electronic Control Module), scanners, and diagnostic equipment. Fine tune your Third Gen computer system for top performance.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-05-2009, 09:03 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
MAF or speed density?

Hey guys,
I'm swapping a tpi onto my 68 chevelle.The motor is a destroked 400(377). I can't remember what cam I originally put in the motor,but it's a fairly lumpy. I put the motor together at least 10 years ago and the c ar has been sitting. The problem I'm faced with is running SD or MAF. I'm told that Maf is a little more forgiving with mods. SD will work, I just need a custom prom. Which system is better in the long run? How much cam can you run with either system. I have a SD computer already (7730) but am wondering if I should go MAF because the engine is far from stock. Opinions please! Thanks
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
xclrate is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 11-05-2009, 09:31 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Ward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 2,690
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt, 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Ward
Re: MAF or speed density?

You're going to need a custom PROM either way, the motor is already far enough from stock that a MAF PROM won't work. Well, it would probably run, but it wouldn't be optimal. One other thing to consider too is that the intake ductwork for SD is a little easier to fab, since you don't need a MAF sensor anywhere in it.

If it were me, I'd go with SD - after the various troubles and headaches I've had related to the MAF computer, I'm even considering upgrading my MAF car to SD. And at least in my area, SD ECM's are easier to find, since they came in many other cars.
__________________

North Texas Third Gen Association
1988 GTA 5.0/M5/3.45 LSD, T-Tops, Digital Dash, Leather - Current Ride
1983 Firebird S/E - Stripped
1995 Chevy 1500 5.7 Ext. Cab - Daily Driver
Ward is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:40 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: MAF or speed density?

Thanks for the quick response. Well,I have a SD comp already. And yes it would be easier to plumb in the engine bay, I just don't know anyone in Fl who can burn a custom prom for me. I was told that Maf would adjust to engine mods up to a point. I've also been told I can run a LS style pcm to run my tpi setup and just turn off everything I'm not going to use.Hmmmm,decisions!
xclrate is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DFI and ECM
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.