Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-14-2003, 09:47 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 337
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 H.O.
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
VSS calibration for 8746 ECM after T56 swap

OK T56 swap guys...really need some help here. I am attempting to avoid purchasing the Dakota Digital converter box after my T56 swap by adjusting the bit settings for the VSS in my 1992 RS with a 1228746 ECM. Take a look at the following web page that I believe was written by Dave Zug (thanks for the T56 shift pattern indicator plate, by the way):

http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~dzug/92z2...0-vss4T56.html

Dave was working on a 1227730 ECM, but I was guessing that the same logic applies to the 1228746 ECM. His VSS bits were numbered b7, b6, and b5 while my bits are number b6, b5, and b4 (see attached image). He was able to get his speed pretty closely corrected by setting bits b7 and b5, so I used the logic that I could get my speed close by setting bits b6 and b4...WRONG! I'm still pegging 110 mph (max speed on my speedo) when I'm going about 5 mph down the road. Of course, this is tripping my speed limiter and killing fuel to the motor, thus rendering the car useless.

Does anyone know which bits to turn on/off to get the speed pretty close? I'm running a 3.08 gear with 275/40R17 tires, by the way.

One other thing...my SES light is constantly flashing while the car is running. I have checked the trouble codes and it gives me the "12" code first (which indicates the ECM is working properly) followed by the "51" code which means there is either a PROM or ECM problem. This may be from when the legs on the EPROM chip were not properly lined up the first time I popped it in, though.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg vss.jpg (31.5 KB, 317 views)
__________________
1992 Camaro RS

Drivetrain: 330HP 350 HO, T56 6-speed, 3.73 posi (previously 305 TBI, T5 5-speed, 3.08)
Intake mods: Edelbrock 750 carb, Edelbrock Air Gap intake, open element air cleaner
Exhaust mods: SLP 1-5/8" headers, 3" Catco cat, Hooker cat-back exhaust
Ignition mods: Accel 300+ plug wires, Moroso wire looms, Jegs HEI distributor, March crank power pulley
Fuel mods: Mallory fuel pressure reg, Earl's braided fuel lines & fittings (still using in-tank TBI pump)
Suspension mods: ROH 17x9.5 ZS wheels, Kumho ECSTA 275/40s, TDS wonderbar
Appearance mods: Z28 bowtie grill, Macewen white-face gauges, 6-spd shift pattern plate
Bulldog92 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2003, 08:00 AM   #2
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 11,390
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: VSS calibration for 8746 ECM after T56 swap

Quote:
Originally posted by Bulldog92
OK T56 swap guys...really need some help here. I am attempting to avoid purchasing the Dakota Digital converter box after my T56 swap by adjusting the bit settings for the VSS in my 1992 RS with a 1228746 ECM.
You can't do what you are attempting. The '8746 doesn't have the same hardware as the '730.

First thing is to go to the 'patch method demo' sticky up top and apply the rev-limiter patch. That will protect your engine while allowing you to drive the car (also apply the code43 patch from same thread).

As for the speedo, a DRAC may work to correct the problem. Used ones can be found in "automotive recycle yards" (that was supposed to be a funny). If diy-efi ever wakes up there is a pdf file on incoming that details the calibration jumpers on the DRAC.

(Anyone here ever use a DRAC for the T56? Does it work?)

Else it will be the Dakota Digital . . .

RBob.
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2003, 08:01 AM   #3
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 11,390
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
As for the flashing SES, if a rapid flash, then you didn't checksum the bin after you modified it, or the chip isn't seated properly.

RBob.
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2003, 09:42 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 337
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 H.O.
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Thanks a ton, RBob...glad to know that it wasn't some crazy electrical problem causing the bit change to not work. Oh well...it was a good learning experience .

As for the DRAC (took me forever to figure out that meant Digital Ratio Adapter Controller), I did tons of searches on thirdgen and all over the internet but found very little. The only site of interest I found was http://www.birfield.com/archives/htm...msg02087.html, but I'm not sure if it is relevant. On first read of the thread, I thought it was indicating that the DRAC from a 93-95 TBI truck would work...but I think I'm wrong. Most of what appeared to be "good" information on my search engine was located on the diy-efi site, which is STILL down.

While we're on the subject of VSS, there seems to be some confusion about the VSS output on a T56 and the expected VSS input for the ECM and speedometer. There are two ways of expressing thing signal: pulses per mile and pulses per driveshaft revolution. From what I've read, the T56 outputs 40,000 pulses per mile, the speedo needs an input of 4,000 pulses per mile, and the ECM needs and input of 2,000 pulses per mile. However, I have also read that the T56 outputs 40 pulses per driveshaft revolution, which makes more sense to me because pulses per mile will be dictated by the differential ratio and the height of the tires. Using a 26" tire, a 3.08 ratio, and the 40 pulses per driveshaft revolution, tell me if this math is correct for converting pulses per driveshaft revolution into pulses per mile:

Feet traveled per tire revolution = 26" / 12" = 2.167'
# tire revolutions per driveshaft rotation = 3.08
Feet traveled per driveshaft rotation = 3.08 * 2.167' = 6.673'
# driveshaft rotations per mile = 5,280 / 6.673 = 791.2
VSS pulses per mile = 791.2 rotations * 40 pulses per rotation = 31,650 pulses per mile (compared to 40,000)

I'm probably way off base here, but I was just curious.

As for the code patches you mentioned...man, that goes over my head FAST. I think the thread states that this code is located on the EPROM, but that's confusing to me because I thought that my 32K chip was only large enough to hold the binary file (unless you mean it is located within the binary file). I'm really eager to learn all about programming, but I'm just now cutting my teeth on burning updated binary files on my EPROM...I probably just need to pace myself.

SO, I guess I'll go ahead and fork over the $80 for the Dakota Digital SGI-5 box and be done with it. Has everyone else mounted their box inside the console? I was trying to think of somewhere else to mount it since I JUST got through spending a couple of hours putting my console back in the car after the T56 swap. Any other mounting location ideas are welcome.

One last thing...I'm almost positive that the GMECM software automatically recalculated the checksum for me after I made the bin edits. Also, I did have a couple of pins on the chip out of alignment the first time I installed the chip, but I have since corrected that problem. That's why I was thinking that the code 51 was still showing up from the first time. I have disconnected the battery since then though, which I thought would "clear" the trouble codes on the ECM.

Man, this reply could pass for a novel...sorry for the rambling...
Bulldog92 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2003, 02:56 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 155

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Feet traveled per tire revolution = 26" / 12" = 2.167'

Should be 26" * PI / 12" = 6.81'

# tire revolutions per driveshaft rotation = 3.08
Feet traveled per driveshaft rotation = 3.08 * 2.167' = 6.673'

Should be 6.81' / 3.08 = 2.21' (drive shaft if spinning faster than the wheel. )

# driveshaft rotations per mile = 5,280 / 6.673 = 791.2

Should be 5280/2.21 = 2389 (this should equal third gear(auto) 4th gear (manual) RPM at 60 MPH)

VSS pulses per mile = 791.2 rotations * 40 pulses per rotation = 31,650 pulses per mile (compared to 40,000)

In the back of my mind I seem to remember 11 and 13 pulses per rev. I dont know for sure but if you want to know for sure just count teeth on the wheel.

Also I looked for the DRAC document and could not find it. I will look again when I am at home.

HTH

John

Last edited by 32V_DOHC; 08-16-2003 at 02:59 PM.
32V_DOHC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2003, 09:28 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 337
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 H.O.
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Man...I should have my engineer title stripped from me...can't believe I forgot that C=2*pi*r...what an idiot

Thanks for the math lesson (ha)
Bulldog92 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2003, 12:41 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: GA.
Posts: 41

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to need4speedb4c
Now I have a few questions...How did you get that picture of the check list for B1, B2..etc...I assumed you use some sort of ecm scanner?

The reason I'm asking is I have a '91 Camaro and I just swapped some 3.23's for some 3.73's and now my speedo is off. It seems like I should be able to reprogram the VSS signal to tell the ECM that I am running 3.73's ? does that make any sense?


-Mace
need4speedb4c is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2003, 01:08 PM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 337
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 H.O.
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Well, here's where I get to look kinda stupid...I was using the wrong mask file. I downloaded it from diy-efi.org on the page for the 1228746 ECM, so I assumed it was correct. However, it was for a 165 ECM instead.

In other words, the "checklist" you referred to was actually for a different ECM. I was using the GMECM software to edit my bin but with the wrong ecu file, which resulted in some really strange constants...guess I should have figured that out earlier. I'm glad that my error was brought to my attention (on a different thirdgen thread) because I was going nuts trying to figure out why my SES light kept flashing after I burnt a new bin on my EPROM. I haven't tried it again with the correct mask yet, but I'm somewhat certain that was the reason.

ANYWAY, I think you have two options for getting your VSS signal corrected. You can either change the speedo gears or purchase an SGI-5 Dakota Digital converter module. You can learn more about the speedo gears in the tech article section at http://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/gears.shtml...however, I think you may have some trouble finding the right gears since I'm pretty sure a thirdgen Camaro never came with 3.73 gears. Your local dealer may be able to help you out, though.

If you go the SGI-5 route, you will basically just wire it up in-between the transmission and the ECM. I just ordered one myself, so I'll be able to tell you more about it after I install it this weekend. The nice thing about it is you can make adjustments every time you change gears or tire height. It will also allow you to run a T56 6-speed tranny if you get tired of that automatic (assuming you have an auto...I think they came with 3.23s). It costs $80 compared to about $25 for the speedo gears (if you can find them).

Hope that helps...let me know if you have any other questions.
Bulldog92 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2003, 06:02 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: GA.
Posts: 41

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to need4speedb4c
Yeah, that helped a lot, thanks

I have an auto, and I'm running 255's in the rear instead of 245. I plan on doing an LS1/T-56 swap as well as getting some 17's with at least 275's in the rear. So it sounds like the speedo swap for me would be putting a band aid on a shot gun wound

Let me know how the install goes and it does what we all hope it does.

-Mace
need4speedb4c is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2003, 06:19 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: GA.
Posts: 41

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to need4speedb4c
By the way, have you ever heard of Electronic Ratio Adapter (ERA)?

Here is their website,

http://www.transmissioncenter.net/sp...n_______va.htm

I didn't know if this was anything like the SGI-5?

-Mace
need4speedb4c is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2003, 11:52 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 584
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to kevm14
I think I have the DRAC PDF you are looking for.

http://kmoore.phzero.net/my%20pictures/drac2.pdf
kevm14 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2003, 01:34 PM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 337
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 H.O.
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Thanks for the DRAC info! That is one of the documents I was trying to find on the diy-efi site. Now for the questions:

1) It looks like this information was generated for 92-94 GM trucks...did my 1992 Camaro RS use the very same DRAC as a 1992 GM pickup?

2) Under "Method #1" the Input Ratio formula uses a 128,000 ppm output to the RWAL (whatever that is)...I just swapped in a T56 and I believe that I have read that it has a 40,000 ppm output (see my confusing post above...I still don't quite understand how it is calculated). Should I just plug in a value of 40,000 as opposed to 128,000 to calculate my input ratio?

3) Just to make sure I'm doing this right, let me run through my car's example. I haven't measured the "actual tire circumference", but let's just use a 26" tall tire for now.

RC = 3.14159 * 26" = 81.681
XR = 3.08
P = 40 pulses per revolution (is this correct for a T56?)

Input Ratio = (63360 * 3.08 * 40) / (81.681 * 40000) = 2.389

Considering that the tables only go up to a 1.977539 ratio, I guess that means that I can't use my factory DRAC to correctly convert the VSS signal from the T56...right? Or did I just make a mistake in the calculation?

4) If for some reason I CAN use my factory DRAC, where is it located? Is it sitting right next to the ECM underneath the passenger side of the dash?


One more thing...I may have been a little confused regarding the speedo gears I discussed above. I got to thinking about it and I don't even know which cars CAME with speedo gears...was it only in 700R4 auto trannys, only through 1989 Camaros, or what. I am not sure if the gears only apply for a mechanical speedo, or if they are actually used to "drive" the VSS electronic signal. Since you have a '91, I know you have an electronic speedo...I just don't know if you have any other option aside from purchasing an SGI-5 (www.dakotadigital.com) or possibly modifying your factory DRAC.
Bulldog92 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2003, 02:07 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 584
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to kevm14
T56 is 17 pulses per rev. So you'd need to modify your existing ratio by a factor of 17/40. That's less than 0.5 so I don't think you can modify your DRAC. I think something like an SGI-5 is required. I guess you could half-*** it and make up the rest by a change in tire diameter...

EDIT: I did some thinking and it occured to me that it all depends what your current setting is. By your calculations, what is your current setting?
kevm14 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2003, 02:12 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,562
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Dewey316 Send a message via AIM to Dewey316 Send a message via MSN to Dewey316 Send a message via Yahoo to Dewey316
can anyone verify that the 90-92 VSS equiped cars, do have a DRAC on them? i did a gear change, and have been to lazy to look for speedo gears, and too cheap to by a DD box. this would be an easy fix if the electronic speedo TBI cars can do this.
Dewey316 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2003, 02:26 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 584
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to kevm14
Well my 93 Caprice with a C3 ECM has a VSS with gears. In other words, I can't change the divider in the EPROM.
kevm14 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2003, 04:33 PM   #16
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 230

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to mhaskell
number of tire revolutions should be 1/rear end ratio, no the other way around correct? If you have 3.08's the driveshaft turns 3.08 times per wheel rev, so wheel rev is 1/3.08 per driveshaft revolution.

Feet traveled per driveshaft rotation =.3246*2.167=.70357
mhaskell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2003, 02:06 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
some "pulses per driveshavt rev" info for varying trannies is here:

http://www.jagsthatrun.com/Pages/Spe...eedometer.html

The bit flags that you change on the '7730 account for the SPEEDO READING AT THE SPEEDO, there is another setting that changes the speed that the COMPUTER sees... the 2 are INDEPENDANT. the speed that the ECM sees can be more precisely set. Without doing this, if you've made the chip mod for MAX RPM shutoff, you will trip it.

I realize the '7730 chip mods are NOT what you need, but I figured I'd put this info here anyway.

I do NOT have that extra info on my site, and I just noticed that the link is dead on my new site, dzy.org, so I'll fix them and make the mods to the speedo doc a little more complete... sorry bout that.

Oh, and thanks for the kind words about my shift plate! I see in CHP, in the LS-1 swap article that my plate is mentioned, although no one else but me whould have even known :/

I still sell about 1 per month average... with no advertising, lol...


-Dave Z
Lumberg is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003, 06:07 AM   #18
Z69
Senior Member
 
Z69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,391

Classifieds Rating: (0)
It's very easy to tell if you car has speedo gears or not. If wire is going to the tail shaft housing, you don't. No 93' cars will have gears. I've seen jap cars with gears to drive a sensor. WTF
Trucks came with 3.42, 3.73, and 4.11. But 28" tires. Bins for trucks may have the settings you need. A 3.42 with a 28" is very close to a 3.08 with 26's. A 4.1 is about a 3.8 though.
This won't help your speedo problem unless they use a DRAC too. Which I assume they do.
This site is fun, I learn something new everytime I'm here. Now I have something else to go find in my bin.

Last edited by Z69; 09-23-2003 at 06:09 AM.
Z69 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003, 09:56 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 584
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to kevm14
Quote:
Originally posted by Scott_Lopez
No 93' cars will have gears.
Did you mean F-body or all GM MY1993 vehicles? And are you talking about a gear-driven speedo or simply a VSS that is gear driven off the tailshaft, instead of a magnetic pickup?
kevm14 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 05:10 AM   #20
Z69
Senior Member
 
Z69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,391

Classifieds Rating: (0)
93' 4L60/4L60E cars and trucks. I try not to work on front drivers.

I have seen gear driven VSS w/ a cable
drv speedo on jap cars.

Anyway, if you have a cable, you will have gears. Wires, probably not.

Stock anyway. There's an aftermarket VSS driven cable adapter too.

I haven't checked to see if a cable drv fits a VSS case yet. Looks closes at a glance.
Z69 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 10:29 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 584
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to kevm14
I guess what I was getting at is that my 93 Caprice VSS is gear driven off the tranny's output shaft. I think it performs a mechanical-electrical conversion in unit and sends that to the DRAC under the dash...So I would have wires coming out of mine. Yet there is actual contact with the output shaft with gears.
kevm14 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 01:35 PM   #22
Supreme Member
 
1bad91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 4,515
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I use the Dakota Digtal SGI-5. It will not only correct the signal, but also comes with a calculations table to fine trim your correct speed via the switches on the box itself. When you get it accurate, a speedo correction required for a gear change is just a switch away! It works great for me!
__________________
1991 Z-28 (Black - Hardtop) 355ci TPI/SLP, Ported Vortec heads, Comp XR276HR-12, Hooker 2210 Longtubes / custom 3" Y-pipe with 3 1/2" mufflex cat-back, Borg Warner T-56, PROM tuned by me!, 3.73's, Hotchkis suspension, custom high-flow lid and ram-air, ALL the bolt-ons, custom Boyd Coddington "1bad91Z" Billet Wheels.
1bad91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 03:33 PM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 1bad91Z
I use the Dakota Digtal SGI-5. It will not only correct the signal, but also comes with a calculations table to fine trim your correct speed via the switches on the box itself. When you get it accurate, a speedo correction required for a gear change is just a switch away! It works great for me!
I've heard they don't go bad too often, but can be "hurt" during an improper installation, and that the company isn't too willing to work with you on warranty replacement. Again, "hearsay", so if anyone wants to offer any first-hand warranty experiences please do.
Lumberg is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 03:33 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
1228746, 4l60e, 8746, 9c1, calibration, caprice, dakota, digital, ecm, files, fix, patch, programming, t56, tbi, tuning, vss
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details