Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-29-2003, 10:41 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: STL area
Posts: 1,398

Classifieds Rating: (0)
idle problem(cough/cough)

Here is the deal.... My engine idles at 65-70kpa@750rpm after the new mods. My idle is extremely rich. This is partly due to the ve tables. But I think the main reason is that because my kpa is soo high the f/p regulator is not hitting the lower limit(39psi). Once I start to drive, the regulator works normal(varies from part throttle 39psi to wot 43psi). Everything is new.... So should I just lean out the idle in the ve tables or find a way to give the regulator enough vacuum? Or just disconnect the vacuum to the regulator and tune for that???
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
11sORbust is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 12-29-2003, 11:15 PM   #2
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ELIZABETH,PA,USA
Posts: 1,984

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Everybody has that problem with a cam that pulls low vacuum, which is one of the reasons you are always soo rich at idle and part throttle wich is where the most vacuum is. Aside from deceleration of course.
Just scale the VE as everybody else does, Also once you get your tune closer the vacuum should raise some as well help the problem even more.
It is nothing to scale lower VE by 20% and more after a large cam install.
One way I always thought would be good to get an awsome idle, and full use of VE, would be to use TPS sensor as map voltage supply, and lose the MAP all together being that throttle position and map are directly affected the same almost.
It would stop that pulsing of vacuum problem.
__________________
[/size][/color]
76 Vega 498 BBC, AFR 325 heads, and a few other goodies.9.02 @ 151
93 Firebird, 7730 ECM, most other 3rd gen running gear, 406 afr's, T56, 11.0 N/A, 10.41 W/150 Shot.
87_TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 11:36 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: idle problem(cough/cough)

Quote:
Originally posted by 11sORbust
Here is the deal.... My engine idles at 65-70kpa@750rpm after the new mods. My idle is extremely rich. This is partly due to the ve tables. But I think the main reason is that because my kpa is soo high the f/p regulator is not hitting the lower limit(39psi). Once I start to drive, the regulator works normal(varies from part throttle 39psi to wot 43psi). Everything is new.... So should I just lean out the idle in the ve tables or find a way to give the regulator enough vacuum? Or just disconnect the vacuum to the regulator and tune for that???
Closed Loop?.
Stock injectors?.
Doubling the HP of a stocker, running stock code with stock injectors is difficult to do. The small injectors, force large BL changes to get things close. And once you close it's still tempermental.

With a large injector, I'd say try the none referenced idea, but it'd be easy to go too lean up on top, IMO.

Tune the VE down in your idle region, and remember to leave the 80-100 K/Pa stuff alone, at the idle rpm regions.
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 11:39 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 87_TA

One way I always thought would be good to get an awsome idle, and full use of VE, would be to use TPS sensor as map voltage supply, and lose the MAP all together being that throttle position and map are directly affected the same almost.
It would stop that pulsing of vacuum problem.
TRY IT! !!!
The AE stuff probably would take some tweaking.

Running the same VE values in the whole idle region is an another way.
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2003, 12:01 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: STL area
Posts: 1,398

Classifieds Rating: (0)
so just "ignore" this condition and tune the ve @ idle, right.?

Btw, here is the specs

73' 400 ci block
bored .030
holley stealth ram
58mm bbk tb
71' 400ci heads (ported to hell)
cam:242/250*duration, .550/.570" lift ,114lda
matching valvesprings and "special" lifters
30lb accel injectors
1.6:1 ratio rockers
1 5/8 headers
no exhaust(cutout)

I'm sure there is more.. Today I reduced the idle ve by 25%. But I wanted to get some input on the fpr condition. So it's nice to know I can just tune around it.....

I did notice (today) that my idle is at 65-70kpa. The brakes work great though. So I guess everything is fine.!?
11sORbust is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2003, 04:14 PM   #6
TGO Supporter
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 3,631

Classifieds Rating: (0)
enlighten me guys! i have a speed density car, 7747, TBI of course. Is this thread regarding a MAF car? If so do they use a FPR that is vacuum referenced? low vacuum=higher fuel pressure? Is the fact that my SD car has stable FP(relatively) make it easier to tune? I know that some of us tried vafpr(me too) and chose to not use it opting instead to go larger injectors to satisfy fuel requirements. what is the threory of using a vac sensitive FPR vs static FP.
Ronny is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2003, 04:44 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,843
Car: Toys 'R Us Big Wheel
Engine: Two Size 10 Feet
Transmission: Direct Foot Pedal Drive

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 11sORbust
so just "ignore" this condition and tune the ve @ idle, right.?
Exactly.

Tim
__________________
2005 Subaru STi, Got RlCE?
My old 11 second 1990 IROC-Z (sold to TGO Member 92 Formula)
TRAXION is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2003, 10:31 PM   #8
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ELIZABETH,PA,USA
Posts: 1,984

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Ronny
enlighten me guys! i have a speed density car, 7747, TBI of course. Is this thread regarding a MAF car? If so do they use a FPR that is vacuum referenced? low vacuum=higher fuel pressure? Is the fact that my SD car has stable FP(relatively) make it easier to tune? I know that some of us tried vafpr(me too) and chose to not use it opting instead to go larger injectors to satisfy fuel requirements. what is the threory of using a vac sensitive FPR vs static FP.
Ronny, in a port injection car at low engine speeds, it seems if your pulse width is too short its not as smooth running as a longer PW. due to lack of port velocity and efficiency, therefor lower FP allows a longer pw which is a blessing with larger injectors.
It also allows broader range of VE as well.
__________________
[/size][/color]
76 Vega 498 BBC, AFR 325 heads, and a few other goodies.9.02 @ 151
93 Firebird, 7730 ECM, most other 3rd gen running gear, 406 afr's, T56, 11.0 N/A, 10.41 W/150 Shot.
87_TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2003, 10:34 PM   #9
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ELIZABETH,PA,USA
Posts: 1,984

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Grumpy
TRY IT! !!!
The AE stuff probably would take some tweaking.

Running the same VE values in the whole idle region is an another way.
I plan to Grumpy,
I will probably do so on my camaro when I get around to swapping it to EFI .
But also would like to have an ECM bench before doing so.
__________________
[/size][/color]
76 Vega 498 BBC, AFR 325 heads, and a few other goodies.9.02 @ 151
93 Firebird, 7730 ECM, most other 3rd gen running gear, 406 afr's, T56, 11.0 N/A, 10.41 W/150 Shot.
87_TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.