Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2004, 04:09 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
A New Use for Closed Loop

Just in quick review.
I have a 91 GMC truck, 7.4L, Auto, TBI, and it uses the 7060 PCM.

Other then some exhaust work, and removing the intake choke point it's completely stock. And being a tow vehicle I keeping it that way, but just for the exercise have been tuning it to get the best possible drivibility and MPG.

In oem form the VE table was into the ninties, and in general not even close to what the engine wanted. So with the WB (with the PCM in Open Loop) I've been gradually going thru the table and getting things real darned close. One thing I had played with some was the BPC to drop the table vales into the 80s which seems to be alot closer to what the true VEs are. So the original 132 BPC has grown to 160.

And there was also some work done on the spark tables, but nothing radical there.

So as it turns out, we had things pretty sweet.

But, it was Open Loop. And like they say, an O2 sensor is a terrible thing to waste.

So I set the BL, and Int limits to 128, lowered the C/L temp thershold back to a resonable number, and disabled the code 44 and 45.

How what I'm working on is being able to set the coolant temp as low as possible, and then set the BL and Int limits with JUST enough range to allow the engine to transistion from cold to closed loop with as much accuracy as possible. It seems that you have to run on the rich side to keep the drivibility, as the engine warms up, maybe with a little correction by being in C/L just that much earlier it will get that extra .002 MPG increase.

Just a share in case anyone else is looking for a tuning idea to play with.
__________________
89 TTA, wrapped in a 2dr Box...
http://home.woh.rr.com/brucesgn/
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2004, 04:22 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I tried moving the BL and Int limits around some. With the large BPC, it no longer takes alot of BL change to get to stoich.. So I have the BL+Int., limits set at 122, and high of 132.

Also decayed out the choke a little faster.
At 23dF, and with a 30 sec warm-up the drivibility is just as good as at 190dF. And about the time the decay runs out the O2 is hot and we're in closed loop in what looks to be a little over a minute.

Oh and as not to get the ecm mad, disabled codes 44 and 45.
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2004, 11:38 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 13

Classifieds Rating: (0)
002 MPG increase

to get that much increase you could have added a 1/2 pound of air increase to your tires or took a healthy crap before you leave the house
carbgeek is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2004, 10:25 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by carbgeek
002 MPG increase
to get that much increase you could have added a 1/2 pound of air increase to your tires or took a healthy ---- before you leave the house
Look at the application again. And if you read up on the various threads about it, it went from 9 MPH to 13+. That's about 50%. It's attention to detail that does pays off.

Excuse me for ignoring the tolling.
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2004, 10:28 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
TechSmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,374
Car: '99 Trans Am, '06 GSX-R, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, 750, Scrap
Transmission: T56, 6-Spd Cassette, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, Stock, 3.42 Open

Classifieds Rating: (0)
So.. relatively no difference between closed loop and open loop operation? That's a nice tune you've got going there
__________________

'99 Trans Am LS1/T56, Ram Air (Daily Driver)
'06 Suzuki GSX-R 750
'86 Camaro Turbocharged/Intercooled 2.8l (TOAST) MPFI/T5, 2-bar/749/$58, 3.4 on stand in prep.
'00 Camaro 3800-II/T5, 195k mi (SOLD), '02 Yamaha YZF-R6 (SOLD), '99 Suzuki SV-650 (SOLD), '88 Camaro LO3/700R4, 320k mi (SOLD)
TechSmurf is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2004, 06:14 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by TechSmurf
So.. relatively no difference between closed loop and open loop operation? That's a nice tune you've got going there
Bingo.
30 secs or so of running, and things are just as nice as being at 190.
And with the large incremential changes with slight BL changes now, allows it to instantly zero in on being right.
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2004, 02:08 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Grumpy I have a question . I have a 1227747 ecm and I have been tuning it in open loop and have it pretty close . When I set it to go into closed loop it runs pretty rotten and the blms are high something like 140s to 150s. Is there a setting in tunercat that i could change to bring the blms in line or will it require retuning the ve tables. Also i would like to know if there is a setting that would shift the mixture in closed loop from 14.7 to say 13.5,I realize these are just calculated values but if I want it to run fatter is there a setting that would allow this.You mentioned narrowing the blm setting low and high what effect does that have ,does it hold it to a tighter setting or limit its range of control.
jimbelmar is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2004, 02:40 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by jimbelmar
Grumpy I have a question . I have a 1227747 ecm and I have been tuning it in open loop and have it pretty close . When I set it to go into closed loop it runs pretty rotten and the blms are high something like 140s to 150s. Is there a setting in tunercat that i could change to bring the blms in line or will it require retuning the ve tables. Also i would like to know if there is a setting that would shift the mixture in closed loop from 14.7 to say 13.5,I realize these are just calculated values but if I want it to run fatter is there a setting that would allow this.You mentioned narrowing the blm setting low and high what effect does that have ,does it hold it to a tighter setting or limit its range of control.
As you may recall, closed loop toggles the AFR to average 14.7. So some of the time is lean of 14.7 and some richer then 14.7.

You might look at the O2 limit voltages, and cut down how much the ecm actually toggles things.

I also went to a larger BPC, and then limited the ranges of the BL and Int..

Yes, you can move the commanded AFR around, but it's a combination of things to do that. Just about a must to have a WB when trying that stuff.
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2004, 04:45 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I managed to bring down the block learn values by going up on fuel table two. You mentioned the bpc ,if i understand it correctly then the larger the number for example 160 = less fuel
the smaller the number for example 120 = more fuel.

Thank you for your help.
jimbelmar is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2004, 11:22 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: west michigan
Posts: 666
Car: 89 RS
Engine: lo3
Transmission: 700R4 w/ B&M shift improver
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
sorry, total noob, but whats the difference between closed and open loop? open is when the engine has just started up and is getting up to operating temp? and closed is when its at 190*?

-chuck
__________________
Click pic for CarDomain site!


B&M shift improver kit. ACS Hooker 2055's w/ 3inch American Thunder. 3.27 9bolt w/ pbr's and willwood adj. prop valve.
Going in soon: spoon SFC's and rebuilt vortec 350
ssxmac is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2004, 11:22 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
3800, closed, cold, engine, loop
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details