vortec spark table
05-09-2006, 07:44 AM
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Shippensburg, PA
Posts: 680
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1981 Buick Century Wagon
Engine: 87 GN engine
Transmission: 2004R
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I used that SA table, and I needed WAY more spark for my combination. That was just for me. The slope seemed to be good, just wasn't enough spark. I added a bunch all over, and adjusted my PE SA and the engine really likes it, so it seems.
06-24-2008, 09:23 PM
#52
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: vortec spark table
If someone finds a Vortec engine bin please post or PM me with it.
The best I've been able to come up with is the iron headed LT1 SA. This one is from a '95 B body car:
The LT1 iron head and the Vortec head share many similarities. Should make a good start for a Vortec headed engine.
RBob.
The best I've been able to come up with is the iron headed LT1 SA. This one is from a '95 B body car:
Code:
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 25 KPA 18 22 26 29.0 31.0 33.0 35.0 36.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 30 KPA 21 25 29 30.5 33.0 35.0 38.0 39.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 43.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 35 KPA 22 26 30 30.5 32.5 34.0 37.0 38.5 39.5 40.0 40.0 41.0 43.0 45.0 45.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 40 KPA 21 24 26 28.0 30.0 31.0 34.0 35.5 36.5 38.0 38.5 39.0 41.0 42.0 43.5 45.0 45.0 45.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 45 KPA 20 22 23 27.0 28.0 29.0 32.0 33.5 34.5 36.5 37.0 38.0 39.5 40.5 41.5 42.5 42.5 42.5 39.0 39.0 39.0 50 KPA 19 21 22 25.5 26.0 27.5 30.0 32.0 33.5 35.0 36.0 37.0 38.5 39.5 40.0 40.5 40.5 40.5 38.0 38.0 38.0 55 KPA 17 19 21 24.0 25.0 26.0 28.5 30.0 32.0 34.0 35.5 36.5 37.5 38.5 39.0 39.5 39.5 39.5 37.0 37.0 37.0 60 KPA 15 17 21 22.0 23.5 24.5 27.0 28.5 31.0 33.5 34.5 35.5 36.5 37.5 38.0 38.5 38.5 38.5 36.0 36.0 36.0 65 KPA 12 15 19 19.5 21.0 23.0 25.0 27.0 30.0 32.5 33.5 34.5 35.5 36.5 37.0 37.5 37.5 37.5 35.0 35.0 35.0 70 KPA 9 12 16 16.5 18.0 21.0 23.0 25.5 29.0 31.5 32.5 33.5 34.5 35.5 37.0 36.5 36.5 36.5 34.0 34.0 34.0 75 KPA 6 9 13 13.5 15.5 19.0 21.0 24.0 27.5 30.0 32.0 33.0 34.0 34.5 36.0 35.5 35.5 35.5 33.0 33.0 33.0 80 KPA 3 6 9.5 10.5 13.0 17.0 19.0 22.0 25.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 33.5 34.0 35.0 34.0 35.0 35.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 85 KPA 2 2 6 7.0 11.0 14.5 17.0 20.0 22.5 25.0 27.0 29.5 31.5 31.5 33.0 32.0 34.0 34.0 31.0 30.0 30.0 90 KPA 2 -1 4 5.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 24.5 27.0 29.0 30.0 31.0 31.0 31.5 31.5 30.0 28.0 28.0 95 KPA 2 -2 2 4.0 8.0 11.0 13.5 15.5 18.5 20.5 22.5 25.5 28.0 29.0 30.0 30.0 30.5 30.5 29.0 28.0 28.0 100 KPA 2 -2 0 3.0 7.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 17.0 19.0 21.0 24.5 27.0 28.0 29.0 29.0 29.5 29.5 28.0 27.0 27.0
RBob.
I'm kinda new to spark tuning. I have a GMPP HO 350 (Iron Vortec heads, 9.1:1 CR, 212 degree intake / 222 degree exhaust @ 0.50") with the Holley Commander TBI setup. I started using this LT1 table, and it was way better than what I had. I was wondering what you'd recommend to go further in my case. I have no access to a dyno or dragstrip. Car is a daily driver, 79 Malibu wagon, 200R4, 3.73 posi). I use a wideband for fuel tuning, and the car hesitates going WOT at idle speed before it takes off. AFR is good.
Thanks, John
07-03-2008, 07:59 AM
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Shippensburg, PA
Posts: 680
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1981 Buick Century Wagon
Engine: 87 GN engine
Transmission: 2004R
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: vortec spark table
John, similar to me. wagon, trans and gears. lol. I ended using quite a few different tables to get what I needed. I have a WB and been to the strip once with the set-up. Your hesitation may or may not be spark. You sure your AE is in line? If you have a WB make sure you aren't getting a lean spike, or a rich bog (a problem it took me forever to get rid of). Feel free to PM me.
Jim
Jim
07-03-2008, 09:18 AM
#54
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wotton,Que
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 93 W/T1500
Engine: 350 Vortec TPI
Transmission: 4L60e 2000 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: vortec spark table
I've the complete calibration report for a 1998 L31 vortec.
W/T1500
W/T1500
07-12-2008, 11:46 AM
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Re: vortec spark table
Hey guys - very helpful discussion
I'm kinda new to spark tuning. I have a GMPP HO 350 (Iron Vortec heads, 9.1:1 CR, 212 degree intake / 222 degree exhaust @ 0.50") with the Holley Commander TBI setup. I started using this LT1 table, and it was way better than what I had. I was wondering what you'd recommend to go further in my case. I have no access to a dyno or dragstrip. Car is a daily driver, 79 Malibu wagon, 200R4, 3.73 posi). I use a wideband for fuel tuning, and the car hesitates going WOT at idle speed before it takes off. AFR is good.
Thanks, John
I'm kinda new to spark tuning. I have a GMPP HO 350 (Iron Vortec heads, 9.1:1 CR, 212 degree intake / 222 degree exhaust @ 0.50") with the Holley Commander TBI setup. I started using this LT1 table, and it was way better than what I had. I was wondering what you'd recommend to go further in my case. I have no access to a dyno or dragstrip. Car is a daily driver, 79 Malibu wagon, 200R4, 3.73 posi). I use a wideband for fuel tuning, and the car hesitates going WOT at idle speed before it takes off. AFR is good.
Thanks, John
If it's a consistent hesitation then it's not likely the code but the calibration. With the wet intake design you can get away with more advance at high kpa and low rpm because those area's are usually only "hit" when you snap the throttle open. Other times it's because you're pulling a stump out of the ground with an ultra tight torque converter... anyways, use the vortec table for the high kpa/load low rpm's that you're getting the hesitation. Then if that doesn't help, it's likely a fuel delivery issue. Try richening up the AE vs MAP at the high kpa, go with steps of 25%. What is tricky is that the code considers the AE pulse width referenced. In other words, your Holley might have bigger injectors and even with changing the injector constant, the AE will be more fuel because larger injectors open for the same amount of time flow more fuel. duh. I don't want to confuse anybody so what I'm about to say might be best ignored... but... when you want to control a cars fuel mileage with your foot, have the AE on TPS and MAP tables about the same. If you want the smoothest running engine, have your MAP AE approx double that of the TPS. I could go into greater detail but I feel it's not really worth it. For 99% of you guys just get it close and you'll be happy.
07-12-2008, 11:16 PM
#56
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engine: RamJet 350 running EZ-EFI 2.0
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.1
Ramjet 350 spark tables...
These were extracted from the MEFI by another fellow. Remember that the Ramjet 350 initial timing is set at 10°.
----------
gotta attach them...
here's the thread where I previously posted them:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...rk-tables.html
----------
gotta attach them...
here's the thread where I previously posted them:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...rk-tables.html
Last edited by silvernblack; 07-13-2008 at 12:05 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86CamaroDan
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
09-29-2015 10:08 PM
