Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-19-2004, 08:37 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 268
Car: 89 Formula T-Top
Engine: 388 MiniramII
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
tweaking accell enrich with MAF

I'm working on tweaking the accell enrich on my MAF 165 ecm and with the miniram and a 6 spd it is proving to be a bit of a pain. I need to take a little fuel out on very light accell, like in a parking lot, and need to take some out during very heavy accell(not quite WOT although that is rich also).

Now my question is this, I'm using TunerPro Rt and what is the difference between these two tables:

Accel. Enrich %BPW Factor vs. Async Pulse
Acceleration Enrichment factor vs. change in LV8

Any info on these tables would be great.
__________________
'89 Formula 388
Tremec T-56 6 spd
MiniRam II w/ 58mm TB
Greg is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2004, 11:31 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: tweaking accell enrich with MAF

Quote:
Originally posted by Greg
Acceleration Enrichment factor vs. change in LV8
LV8 is the MAF reading inclusive of the rpm. MAF inclusive of RPM, gives a *load* variable.

So AE as a function of LV8, is GM's way of doing AE as a function of increasing/changing, airflow.
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2004, 12:14 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 268
Car: 89 Formula T-Top
Engine: 388 MiniramII
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
OK that makes sense. So then there's this other table (Accel. Enrich %BPW Factor vs. Async Pulse) that looks like it does the same thing. But I figure they have to be different on some critical point. What triggers a "pulse" in accell enrich and what triggs how many pulses?
__________________
'89 Formula 388
Tremec T-56 6 spd
MiniRam II w/ 58mm TB
Greg is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 10:30 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 268
Car: 89 Formula T-Top
Engine: 388 MiniramII
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Anybody got any info on this?
__________________
'89 Formula 388
Tremec T-56 6 spd
MiniRam II w/ 58mm TB
Greg is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2004, 10:17 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Guilford, NY
Posts: 558
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 w/TransGo
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
There are several tables and constants that make AE work. They all are used togethor. The BPW of the AE event is based on the LV8 multiplier tables, as well as the asynch tables. Once you have AE triggered, via the constants mainly, then all these tables come in to multiply and affect the amount of extra fuel that gets added.

IE you may have 24 pulses set at 80degC, then the factor for the first 8 pulses gets multiplied by the coolant table, then you have LV8 tables....all this stuff just basically comes in to create the AE pules width. It doesnt last long, and it is fixed at 12.5mS intervals.

You just need to look at all the AE tables and constants on 1 sheet of paper, and it should all make sense.

HTH
__________________
Best ET 14.413 @95.57 w/2.77 stock rear(10/01/2000)
NEW! Best ET 14.0474 @95.31 with 3.73gears(06/05/2011) and 1.8823 60'
Still stock valve covers & stock block, cam, heads.
Vigilante TC, tranny rebuilt, Spohn torque arm. Finally into sub-2.00 sec 60' zone!

Many other basic mods. Continuous PROM tuning. Got traction, need reaction!
MikeT 88IROC350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2004, 11:57 AM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 466
Car: 1985 IROC-Z
Engine: 1989 350 4 bolt roller block
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4 Road Race with Edge 9.5" 2800 stall lockup converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Mr. Moderator: Would you please add this post to the 165 ECM tuning articles section. Thanks!!!!!!
Captain C is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2004, 11:57 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
accel, async, bpw, enrich, factor, pulse
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details