Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-10-2005, 05:23 PM   #1
Supreme Member
 
Craig Moates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,576
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Using MSD Pro-Billet Mech Advance Dist with 730

Anyone have experience in this regard? Looking at a 85561 MSD for some dyno.

My thinking is to segregate the spark advance duties off of the ECM for the moment and just control fueling via EFI. Of course, I need RPM input and what-not for everything. So how would that be done?

I'll compare the results of those tests on the dyno to results using an MSD 8366 and some ECM-controlled advance patterns.
__________________
http://www.moates.net
Craig Moates is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2005, 05:54 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Using MSD Pro-Billet Mech Advance Dist with 730

Quote:
Originally posted by Craig Moates
Anyone have experience in this regard? Looking at a 85561 MSD for some dyno.

My thinking is to segregate the spark advance duties off of the ECM for the moment and just control fueling via EFI. Of course, I need RPM input and what-not for everything. So how would that be done?

I'll compare the results of those tests on the dyno to results using an MSD 8366 and some ECM-controlled advance patterns.
Why?.

Does the 85561 still use a reluctor type trigger?.
If so the only difference is going to be the effects of the differences in air gap.

A remote mount coil HEI will do everything as well as an MSD, IMO.

If your distributor has shot bushings, then the MSD might be a lil, better, but so would just a fresh stock distributor.

IMO, CDI, DIS, or CNP are much better answers.

Better yet, DIS, with 4 CDIs so that you have multi-spark all the way to redline.
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2005, 06:05 PM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Craig Moates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,576
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Well, I've got both units on hand (both MSD units). The MSD folks also concur that there's no difference. I was just wanting to do a little comparo of mech -vs- ECM controlled advance. This goes back to the carb -vs- EFI thing ya know.
Craig Moates is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2005, 06:40 PM   #4
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 11,389
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
To keep the ECM happy enough to fire the injectors need to provide a DRP. This would be a square ware, 0-5v. It can be either the controlled timing or the reference timing, wouldn't matter. Although the injector timing would shift to be relative to the DRP. Look at REF+ and REF- into the ECM, that is the minimum expected signal.

The ECM will instantly throw a code 42 and lock out it's timing control. But that wouldn't matter. The distributor is controlling timing.

RBob.
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2005, 08:06 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Craig Moates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,576
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Crap. This means I'd need some auxiliary circuitry to run the non EFI distributor. Ah well, so be it. Will just use the 8366 then. Was worth consideration at least.
Craig Moates is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2005, 09:56 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787

Classifieds Rating: (0)
craig ive been using a probillet msd distributor for sevral reasons in the sister buildup of the 427 were doing here. which by the way dynoed out very impressively. once we make some tb mods ill get the new tune right and get it going here. as for the pro billet your stuck like i was becuase of the polymer gear only existing in the .500 shatf diameter. so youve got to run a msd pro billet becuase its the only shaft out there that can hold the gear. unless you were to make a bushing to intall on the distributor shaft to bush the .487 shaft to .50
funstick is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2005, 05:54 PM   #7
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Evansville, IN USA
Posts: 404
Car: '89 GMC Pickup
Engine: 383 SBC Stealth Ram
Transmission: 700R4/VIG 3200

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Craig Moates
Crap. This means I'd need some auxiliary circuitry to run the non EFI distributor. Ah well, so be it. Will just use the 8366 then. Was worth consideration at least.
Craig, I took the magnetic output from a MSD 8570, (same as the other MSD's) and hooked it to the ESC module mounted on a heatsink to the firewall and it worked perfect for over two years.

Couldn't you do the same and just zero out the timing tables and let the mechanical advance work like you want it to?

Just an idea...
__________________
_________
SMasterson
SMasterson is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2005, 06:29 PM   #8
Supreme Member
 
Craig Moates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,576
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I'd like to give it a whirl, yes...
Craig Moates is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2005, 12:00 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
RednGold86Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: All over China, Iowa, and San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,692
Car: 1989 GTA, 1986 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to RednGold86Z
If running another type of Reluctor into a GM module

Just make sure you connect the two wires properly to P and N of the module (positive and negative, duh). If you scope the reluctor signal, you'll see it start from 0, rise, drop quick to below 0 and rise up to 0. That is the correct way. The incorrect way will dip, jump, and decay to 0 (exact opposite or correct). The GM Module begins the REF hi pulse to the ECU when the voltage rises just a tad above 0, and stops the pulse just as it crosses 0 in the sharp fall. The ECU looks for the falling edge of the REF signal. Remember to ground the ignition module body, also.

BTW, there will be spark if it's corrected incorrectly, but the timing will change with RPM (in addition to mechanical advance), and in general just suck.
RednGold86Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2005, 10:16 PM   #10
Supreme Member
 
Craig Moates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,576
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Ah well, this was a wash. Just put the mech advance unit aside, and ran the EFI controlled unit. Ran great, and MUCH more flexibility. Actually was able to gain a bit by changing how fast the timing came in from like 3500-5500. Really helped the characteristics. I think with several iterations on fueling and timing, along with WB and EGT data, all bets are off in terms of how good you can get the tune dialed in. Pretty incredible.
Craig Moates is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2005, 10:16 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
8366, air, airgap, billet, cross, distributer, distributor, ecm, gap, mnd, msd, pro, reference, reluctor
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details